Cargando…
Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review
BACKGROUND: Screening for asymptomatic health conditions is perceived as mostly beneficial, with possible harms receiving little attention. AIMS: To quantify proximal and longer-term consequences for individuals receiving a diagnostic label following screening for an asymptomatic, non-cancer health...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37073644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.49 |
_version_ | 1785031712086949888 |
---|---|
author | Sims, Rebecca Michaleff, Zoe A. Glasziou, Paul Jones, Mark Thomas, Rae |
author_facet | Sims, Rebecca Michaleff, Zoe A. Glasziou, Paul Jones, Mark Thomas, Rae |
author_sort | Sims, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Screening for asymptomatic health conditions is perceived as mostly beneficial, with possible harms receiving little attention. AIMS: To quantify proximal and longer-term consequences for individuals receiving a diagnostic label following screening for an asymptomatic, non-cancer health condition. METHOD: Five electronic databases were searched (inception to November 2022) for studies that recruited asymptomatic screened individuals who received or did not receive a diagnostic label. Eligible studies reported psychological, psychosocial and/or behavioural outcomes before and after screening results. Independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, extracted data from included studies, and assessed risk of bias (Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions). Results were meta-analysed or descriptively reported. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included. Twelve studies addressed psychological outcomes, four studies examined behavioural outcomes and none reported psychosocial outcomes. Risk of bias was judged as low (n = 8), moderate (n = 5) or serious (n = 3). Immediately after receiving results, anxiety was significantly higher for individuals receiving versus not receiving a diagnostic label (mean difference −7.28, 95% CI −12.85 to −1.71). On average, anxiety increased from the non-clinical to clinical range, but returned to the non-clinical range in the longer term. No significant immediate or longer-term differences were found for depression or general mental health. Absenteeism did not significantly differ from the year before to the year after screening. CONCLUSIONS: The impacts of screening asymptomatic, non-cancer health conditions are not universally positive. Limited research exists regarding longer-term impacts. Well-designed, high-quality studies further investigating these impacts are required to assist development of protocols that minimise psychological distress following diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10134215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101342152023-04-28 Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review Sims, Rebecca Michaleff, Zoe A. Glasziou, Paul Jones, Mark Thomas, Rae BJPsych Open Review BACKGROUND: Screening for asymptomatic health conditions is perceived as mostly beneficial, with possible harms receiving little attention. AIMS: To quantify proximal and longer-term consequences for individuals receiving a diagnostic label following screening for an asymptomatic, non-cancer health condition. METHOD: Five electronic databases were searched (inception to November 2022) for studies that recruited asymptomatic screened individuals who received or did not receive a diagnostic label. Eligible studies reported psychological, psychosocial and/or behavioural outcomes before and after screening results. Independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, extracted data from included studies, and assessed risk of bias (Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions). Results were meta-analysed or descriptively reported. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included. Twelve studies addressed psychological outcomes, four studies examined behavioural outcomes and none reported psychosocial outcomes. Risk of bias was judged as low (n = 8), moderate (n = 5) or serious (n = 3). Immediately after receiving results, anxiety was significantly higher for individuals receiving versus not receiving a diagnostic label (mean difference −7.28, 95% CI −12.85 to −1.71). On average, anxiety increased from the non-clinical to clinical range, but returned to the non-clinical range in the longer term. No significant immediate or longer-term differences were found for depression or general mental health. Absenteeism did not significantly differ from the year before to the year after screening. CONCLUSIONS: The impacts of screening asymptomatic, non-cancer health conditions are not universally positive. Limited research exists regarding longer-term impacts. Well-designed, high-quality studies further investigating these impacts are required to assist development of protocols that minimise psychological distress following diagnosis. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10134215/ /pubmed/37073644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.49 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Sims, Rebecca Michaleff, Zoe A. Glasziou, Paul Jones, Mark Thomas, Rae Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review |
title | Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review |
title_full | Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review |
title_fullStr | Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review |
title_short | Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review |
title_sort | quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37073644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.49 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simsrebecca quantifyingthepsychologicalandbehaviouralconsequencesofadiagnosticlabelfornoncancerconditionssystematicreview AT michaleffzoea quantifyingthepsychologicalandbehaviouralconsequencesofadiagnosticlabelfornoncancerconditionssystematicreview AT glaszioupaul quantifyingthepsychologicalandbehaviouralconsequencesofadiagnosticlabelfornoncancerconditionssystematicreview AT jonesmark quantifyingthepsychologicalandbehaviouralconsequencesofadiagnosticlabelfornoncancerconditionssystematicreview AT thomasrae quantifyingthepsychologicalandbehaviouralconsequencesofadiagnosticlabelfornoncancerconditionssystematicreview |