Cargando…

Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review

BACKGROUND: Screening for asymptomatic health conditions is perceived as mostly beneficial, with possible harms receiving little attention. AIMS: To quantify proximal and longer-term consequences for individuals receiving a diagnostic label following screening for an asymptomatic, non-cancer health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sims, Rebecca, Michaleff, Zoe A., Glasziou, Paul, Jones, Mark, Thomas, Rae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37073644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.49
_version_ 1785031712086949888
author Sims, Rebecca
Michaleff, Zoe A.
Glasziou, Paul
Jones, Mark
Thomas, Rae
author_facet Sims, Rebecca
Michaleff, Zoe A.
Glasziou, Paul
Jones, Mark
Thomas, Rae
author_sort Sims, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening for asymptomatic health conditions is perceived as mostly beneficial, with possible harms receiving little attention. AIMS: To quantify proximal and longer-term consequences for individuals receiving a diagnostic label following screening for an asymptomatic, non-cancer health condition. METHOD: Five electronic databases were searched (inception to November 2022) for studies that recruited asymptomatic screened individuals who received or did not receive a diagnostic label. Eligible studies reported psychological, psychosocial and/or behavioural outcomes before and after screening results. Independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, extracted data from included studies, and assessed risk of bias (Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions). Results were meta-analysed or descriptively reported. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included. Twelve studies addressed psychological outcomes, four studies examined behavioural outcomes and none reported psychosocial outcomes. Risk of bias was judged as low (n = 8), moderate (n = 5) or serious (n = 3). Immediately after receiving results, anxiety was significantly higher for individuals receiving versus not receiving a diagnostic label (mean difference −7.28, 95% CI −12.85 to −1.71). On average, anxiety increased from the non-clinical to clinical range, but returned to the non-clinical range in the longer term. No significant immediate or longer-term differences were found for depression or general mental health. Absenteeism did not significantly differ from the year before to the year after screening. CONCLUSIONS: The impacts of screening asymptomatic, non-cancer health conditions are not universally positive. Limited research exists regarding longer-term impacts. Well-designed, high-quality studies further investigating these impacts are required to assist development of protocols that minimise psychological distress following diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101342152023-04-28 Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review Sims, Rebecca Michaleff, Zoe A. Glasziou, Paul Jones, Mark Thomas, Rae BJPsych Open Review BACKGROUND: Screening for asymptomatic health conditions is perceived as mostly beneficial, with possible harms receiving little attention. AIMS: To quantify proximal and longer-term consequences for individuals receiving a diagnostic label following screening for an asymptomatic, non-cancer health condition. METHOD: Five electronic databases were searched (inception to November 2022) for studies that recruited asymptomatic screened individuals who received or did not receive a diagnostic label. Eligible studies reported psychological, psychosocial and/or behavioural outcomes before and after screening results. Independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, extracted data from included studies, and assessed risk of bias (Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions). Results were meta-analysed or descriptively reported. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included. Twelve studies addressed psychological outcomes, four studies examined behavioural outcomes and none reported psychosocial outcomes. Risk of bias was judged as low (n = 8), moderate (n = 5) or serious (n = 3). Immediately after receiving results, anxiety was significantly higher for individuals receiving versus not receiving a diagnostic label (mean difference −7.28, 95% CI −12.85 to −1.71). On average, anxiety increased from the non-clinical to clinical range, but returned to the non-clinical range in the longer term. No significant immediate or longer-term differences were found for depression or general mental health. Absenteeism did not significantly differ from the year before to the year after screening. CONCLUSIONS: The impacts of screening asymptomatic, non-cancer health conditions are not universally positive. Limited research exists regarding longer-term impacts. Well-designed, high-quality studies further investigating these impacts are required to assist development of protocols that minimise psychological distress following diagnosis. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10134215/ /pubmed/37073644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.49 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Sims, Rebecca
Michaleff, Zoe A.
Glasziou, Paul
Jones, Mark
Thomas, Rae
Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review
title Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review
title_full Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review
title_fullStr Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review
title_short Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review
title_sort quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37073644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.49
work_keys_str_mv AT simsrebecca quantifyingthepsychologicalandbehaviouralconsequencesofadiagnosticlabelfornoncancerconditionssystematicreview
AT michaleffzoea quantifyingthepsychologicalandbehaviouralconsequencesofadiagnosticlabelfornoncancerconditionssystematicreview
AT glaszioupaul quantifyingthepsychologicalandbehaviouralconsequencesofadiagnosticlabelfornoncancerconditionssystematicreview
AT jonesmark quantifyingthepsychologicalandbehaviouralconsequencesofadiagnosticlabelfornoncancerconditionssystematicreview
AT thomasrae quantifyingthepsychologicalandbehaviouralconsequencesofadiagnosticlabelfornoncancerconditionssystematicreview