Cargando…

Cost‐effectiveness of first‐line immunotherapies for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Researchers have not simultaneously compared the cost‐effectiveness of six immunotherapies with chemotherapy for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. This study evaluated the cost‐effectiveness across different programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) levels. METHODS: A Markov model with lifeti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Szu‐Chun, Ou, Huang‐Tz, Su, Wu‐Chou, Wang, Shi‐Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36653947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5632
_version_ 1785031722248699904
author Yang, Szu‐Chun
Ou, Huang‐Tz
Su, Wu‐Chou
Wang, Shi‐Yi
author_facet Yang, Szu‐Chun
Ou, Huang‐Tz
Su, Wu‐Chou
Wang, Shi‐Yi
author_sort Yang, Szu‐Chun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Researchers have not simultaneously compared the cost‐effectiveness of six immunotherapies with chemotherapy for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. This study evaluated the cost‐effectiveness across different programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) levels. METHODS: A Markov model with lifetime horizon was created for seven regimens: pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (pembro‐chemo), nivolumab plus ipilimumab (nivo‐ipi), nivolumab, ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (nivo‐ipi‐chemo), atezolizumab plus chemotherapy (atezo‐chemo), atezolizumab, bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (atezo‐beva‐chemo), single‐agent pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy alone. Input parameters were derived from trial data, a network meta‐analysis, and other literature. We conducted the analysis from the perspective of US health care sector. RESULTS: For all patients without considering PD‐L1 expression, the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) of pembro‐chemo versus chemotherapy was $183,299 per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY). The preferred regimens based on ICERs differed by PD‐L1 levels. For patients with PD‐L1 ≥50%, pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy and pembro‐chemo versus pembrolizumab resulted in ICERs of $96,189 and $198,913 per QALY, respectively. The other strategies were dominated. For patients with PD‐L1 of 1%–49%, the ICER of pembro‐chemo comparing to chemotherapy was $218,159 per QALY. The other regimens were dominated by pembro‐chemo. For patients with PD‐L1 <1%, nivo‐ipi versus chemotherapy and nivo‐ipi‐chemo versus nivo‐ipi resulted in ICERs of $161,277 and $881,975 per QALY, and the other regimens were dominated strategies. At the willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY, pembrolizumab had 87% and pembro‐chemo had 1% probabilities being cost‐effective in patients with PD‐L1 ≥50% and 1%–49%, respectively. Nivo‐ipi had a 34% probability being cost‐effective in patients with PD‐L1 <1%. CONCLUSIONS: The PD‐L1 level should be incorporated into treatment decision‐making. Our findings suggest that first‐line pembrolizumab, pembro‐chemo, and nivo‐ipi are the preferred strategies for patients with PD‐L1 ≥50%, 1%–49%, and <1%, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101342572023-04-28 Cost‐effectiveness of first‐line immunotherapies for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer Yang, Szu‐Chun Ou, Huang‐Tz Su, Wu‐Chou Wang, Shi‐Yi Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Researchers have not simultaneously compared the cost‐effectiveness of six immunotherapies with chemotherapy for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. This study evaluated the cost‐effectiveness across different programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) levels. METHODS: A Markov model with lifetime horizon was created for seven regimens: pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (pembro‐chemo), nivolumab plus ipilimumab (nivo‐ipi), nivolumab, ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (nivo‐ipi‐chemo), atezolizumab plus chemotherapy (atezo‐chemo), atezolizumab, bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (atezo‐beva‐chemo), single‐agent pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy alone. Input parameters were derived from trial data, a network meta‐analysis, and other literature. We conducted the analysis from the perspective of US health care sector. RESULTS: For all patients without considering PD‐L1 expression, the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) of pembro‐chemo versus chemotherapy was $183,299 per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY). The preferred regimens based on ICERs differed by PD‐L1 levels. For patients with PD‐L1 ≥50%, pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy and pembro‐chemo versus pembrolizumab resulted in ICERs of $96,189 and $198,913 per QALY, respectively. The other strategies were dominated. For patients with PD‐L1 of 1%–49%, the ICER of pembro‐chemo comparing to chemotherapy was $218,159 per QALY. The other regimens were dominated by pembro‐chemo. For patients with PD‐L1 <1%, nivo‐ipi versus chemotherapy and nivo‐ipi‐chemo versus nivo‐ipi resulted in ICERs of $161,277 and $881,975 per QALY, and the other regimens were dominated strategies. At the willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY, pembrolizumab had 87% and pembro‐chemo had 1% probabilities being cost‐effective in patients with PD‐L1 ≥50% and 1%–49%, respectively. Nivo‐ipi had a 34% probability being cost‐effective in patients with PD‐L1 <1%. CONCLUSIONS: The PD‐L1 level should be incorporated into treatment decision‐making. Our findings suggest that first‐line pembrolizumab, pembro‐chemo, and nivo‐ipi are the preferred strategies for patients with PD‐L1 ≥50%, 1%–49%, and <1%, respectively. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10134257/ /pubmed/36653947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5632 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Yang, Szu‐Chun
Ou, Huang‐Tz
Su, Wu‐Chou
Wang, Shi‐Yi
Cost‐effectiveness of first‐line immunotherapies for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
title Cost‐effectiveness of first‐line immunotherapies for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
title_full Cost‐effectiveness of first‐line immunotherapies for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr Cost‐effectiveness of first‐line immunotherapies for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Cost‐effectiveness of first‐line immunotherapies for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
title_short Cost‐effectiveness of first‐line immunotherapies for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
title_sort cost‐effectiveness of first‐line immunotherapies for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36653947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5632
work_keys_str_mv AT yangszuchun costeffectivenessoffirstlineimmunotherapiesforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT ouhuangtz costeffectivenessoffirstlineimmunotherapiesforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT suwuchou costeffectivenessoffirstlineimmunotherapiesforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT wangshiyi costeffectivenessoffirstlineimmunotherapiesforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer