Cargando…

Prognostic value of modified criteria for hydroxyurea resistance or intolerance in patients with high‐risk essential thrombocythemia

BACKGROUND: Recognizing intolerance or resistance to hydroxyurea (HU), which is related to the high risk of a disease transformation and reduced survival in essential thrombocythemia (ET), is crucial to making a reasonable decision about second‐line therapy. We assessed the prognostic impact of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Young Hoon, Lee, Sewon, Mun, Yeung‐Chul, Park, Dong Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36622093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5602
_version_ 1785031736949735424
author Park, Young Hoon
Lee, Sewon
Mun, Yeung‐Chul
Park, Dong Jin
author_facet Park, Young Hoon
Lee, Sewon
Mun, Yeung‐Chul
Park, Dong Jin
author_sort Park, Young Hoon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recognizing intolerance or resistance to hydroxyurea (HU), which is related to the high risk of a disease transformation and reduced survival in essential thrombocythemia (ET), is crucial to making a reasonable decision about second‐line therapy. We assessed the prognostic impact of the modified European LeukemiaNet (mELN) criteria used in a recent MAJIC‐ET trial by analyzing the incidence of resistance or intolerance to HU and the survival outcome compared with those of the ELN criteria. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the development of HU resistance or intolerance according to the ELN and mELN criteria for 148 high‐risk ET patients receiving HU between 2014 and 2018. The maximum tolerated dose for defining HU resistance was used in the mELN criteria. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 65 years (range, 36–87), with a median follow‐up of 3.6 years (range, 1.1–6.4). Two thromboembolic events were observed during HU treatment. When applying the ELN criteria, 10 patients (6.9%) were resistant (n = 5 [3.4%]) or intolerant (n = 5 [3.4%]) to HU in comparison with 22 patients (15%, 14 [9.8%]) resistant and 8 [5.5%] intolerant when applying the mELN criteria. Transformation to myelofibrosis and acute myeloid leukemia occurred in 2 (1.4%) patients and 1 (0.7%) patient, respectively, as defined by the ELN criteria compared with 3 (2.1%) and 2 (1.4%) patients as defined by the mELN criteria. In multivariate analysis of transformation‐free survival, HU resistance defined by the mELN criteria but not the ELN criteria was an independent prognostic factor. In addition, HU resistance as defined by both sets of criteria was an independent risk factor for inferior overall survival. Intolerance of HU did not have any prognostic impact on survival. CONCLUSIONS: The mELN criteria are useful for identifying high‐risk ET patients who might be eligible for second‐line therapy in practice, which should be validated in a prospective setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101343192023-04-28 Prognostic value of modified criteria for hydroxyurea resistance or intolerance in patients with high‐risk essential thrombocythemia Park, Young Hoon Lee, Sewon Mun, Yeung‐Chul Park, Dong Jin Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Recognizing intolerance or resistance to hydroxyurea (HU), which is related to the high risk of a disease transformation and reduced survival in essential thrombocythemia (ET), is crucial to making a reasonable decision about second‐line therapy. We assessed the prognostic impact of the modified European LeukemiaNet (mELN) criteria used in a recent MAJIC‐ET trial by analyzing the incidence of resistance or intolerance to HU and the survival outcome compared with those of the ELN criteria. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the development of HU resistance or intolerance according to the ELN and mELN criteria for 148 high‐risk ET patients receiving HU between 2014 and 2018. The maximum tolerated dose for defining HU resistance was used in the mELN criteria. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 65 years (range, 36–87), with a median follow‐up of 3.6 years (range, 1.1–6.4). Two thromboembolic events were observed during HU treatment. When applying the ELN criteria, 10 patients (6.9%) were resistant (n = 5 [3.4%]) or intolerant (n = 5 [3.4%]) to HU in comparison with 22 patients (15%, 14 [9.8%]) resistant and 8 [5.5%] intolerant when applying the mELN criteria. Transformation to myelofibrosis and acute myeloid leukemia occurred in 2 (1.4%) patients and 1 (0.7%) patient, respectively, as defined by the ELN criteria compared with 3 (2.1%) and 2 (1.4%) patients as defined by the mELN criteria. In multivariate analysis of transformation‐free survival, HU resistance defined by the mELN criteria but not the ELN criteria was an independent prognostic factor. In addition, HU resistance as defined by both sets of criteria was an independent risk factor for inferior overall survival. Intolerance of HU did not have any prognostic impact on survival. CONCLUSIONS: The mELN criteria are useful for identifying high‐risk ET patients who might be eligible for second‐line therapy in practice, which should be validated in a prospective setting. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10134319/ /pubmed/36622093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5602 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Park, Young Hoon
Lee, Sewon
Mun, Yeung‐Chul
Park, Dong Jin
Prognostic value of modified criteria for hydroxyurea resistance or intolerance in patients with high‐risk essential thrombocythemia
title Prognostic value of modified criteria for hydroxyurea resistance or intolerance in patients with high‐risk essential thrombocythemia
title_full Prognostic value of modified criteria for hydroxyurea resistance or intolerance in patients with high‐risk essential thrombocythemia
title_fullStr Prognostic value of modified criteria for hydroxyurea resistance or intolerance in patients with high‐risk essential thrombocythemia
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of modified criteria for hydroxyurea resistance or intolerance in patients with high‐risk essential thrombocythemia
title_short Prognostic value of modified criteria for hydroxyurea resistance or intolerance in patients with high‐risk essential thrombocythemia
title_sort prognostic value of modified criteria for hydroxyurea resistance or intolerance in patients with high‐risk essential thrombocythemia
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36622093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5602
work_keys_str_mv AT parkyounghoon prognosticvalueofmodifiedcriteriaforhydroxyurearesistanceorintoleranceinpatientswithhighriskessentialthrombocythemia
AT leesewon prognosticvalueofmodifiedcriteriaforhydroxyurearesistanceorintoleranceinpatientswithhighriskessentialthrombocythemia
AT munyeungchul prognosticvalueofmodifiedcriteriaforhydroxyurearesistanceorintoleranceinpatientswithhighriskessentialthrombocythemia
AT parkdongjin prognosticvalueofmodifiedcriteriaforhydroxyurearesistanceorintoleranceinpatientswithhighriskessentialthrombocythemia