Cargando…

Ten‐year outcomes of whole‐pelvic intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer with regional lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND: Management of pelvic node‐positive prostate cancer has been challenging and controversial. We conducted a study to evaluate the outcomes of whole‐pelvic (WP) simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Kiyonao, Norihisa, Yoshiki, Ikeda, Itaru, Inokuchi, Haruo, Aizawa, Rihito, Kamoto, Toshiyuki, Kamba, Tomomi, Inoue, Takahiro, Yamasaki, Toshinari, Akamatsu, Shusuke, Kobayashi, Takashi, Ogawa, Osamu, Mizowaki, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5554
_version_ 1785031738647379968
author Nakamura, Kiyonao
Norihisa, Yoshiki
Ikeda, Itaru
Inokuchi, Haruo
Aizawa, Rihito
Kamoto, Toshiyuki
Kamba, Tomomi
Inoue, Takahiro
Yamasaki, Toshinari
Akamatsu, Shusuke
Kobayashi, Takashi
Ogawa, Osamu
Mizowaki, Takashi
author_facet Nakamura, Kiyonao
Norihisa, Yoshiki
Ikeda, Itaru
Inokuchi, Haruo
Aizawa, Rihito
Kamoto, Toshiyuki
Kamba, Tomomi
Inoue, Takahiro
Yamasaki, Toshinari
Akamatsu, Shusuke
Kobayashi, Takashi
Ogawa, Osamu
Mizowaki, Takashi
author_sort Nakamura, Kiyonao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Management of pelvic node‐positive prostate cancer has been challenging and controversial. We conducted a study to evaluate the outcomes of whole‐pelvic (WP) simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS: A total of 67 consecutive patients with cT1c‐4N1M0 prostate cancer were definitively treated by WP SIB‐IMRT. Neoadjuvant ADT (median: 8.3 months) was administered in all cases. WP SIB‐IMRT was designed to simultaneously deliver 78, 66.3, and 58.5 Gy in 39 fractions to the prostate plus seminal vesicles, metastatic lymph nodes (LNs), and the pelvic LN region, respectively. Adjuvant ADT (median: 24.7 months) was administered in 66 patients. RESULTS: The median follow‐up period was 81.6 months (range: 30.5–160.7). Biochemical relapse‐free, overall, and prostate cancer‐specific survival rates at 10 years were 59.8%, 79.6%, and 86.3%, respectively. Loco‐regional recurrence was not observed. Being in International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 5 and having a posttreatment detectable nadir prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level (≥0.010 ng/ml) were significantly associated with worse prostate cancer‐specific survival and progression of castration resistance. The 10‐year cumulative incidence rates of grade 2 and 3 late toxicities were, respectively, 1.5% and 0% for genitourinary, 0% and 1.5% for gastrointestinal events. No grade 4 acute or late toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: WP SIB‐IMRT can be safely administered to patients with pelvic node‐positive prostate cancer. Since grade group 5 and detectable nadir PSA levels are risks for castration resistance, we may need to increase the intensity of treatment for such cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101343262023-04-28 Ten‐year outcomes of whole‐pelvic intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer with regional lymph node metastasis Nakamura, Kiyonao Norihisa, Yoshiki Ikeda, Itaru Inokuchi, Haruo Aizawa, Rihito Kamoto, Toshiyuki Kamba, Tomomi Inoue, Takahiro Yamasaki, Toshinari Akamatsu, Shusuke Kobayashi, Takashi Ogawa, Osamu Mizowaki, Takashi Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Management of pelvic node‐positive prostate cancer has been challenging and controversial. We conducted a study to evaluate the outcomes of whole‐pelvic (WP) simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS: A total of 67 consecutive patients with cT1c‐4N1M0 prostate cancer were definitively treated by WP SIB‐IMRT. Neoadjuvant ADT (median: 8.3 months) was administered in all cases. WP SIB‐IMRT was designed to simultaneously deliver 78, 66.3, and 58.5 Gy in 39 fractions to the prostate plus seminal vesicles, metastatic lymph nodes (LNs), and the pelvic LN region, respectively. Adjuvant ADT (median: 24.7 months) was administered in 66 patients. RESULTS: The median follow‐up period was 81.6 months (range: 30.5–160.7). Biochemical relapse‐free, overall, and prostate cancer‐specific survival rates at 10 years were 59.8%, 79.6%, and 86.3%, respectively. Loco‐regional recurrence was not observed. Being in International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 5 and having a posttreatment detectable nadir prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level (≥0.010 ng/ml) were significantly associated with worse prostate cancer‐specific survival and progression of castration resistance. The 10‐year cumulative incidence rates of grade 2 and 3 late toxicities were, respectively, 1.5% and 0% for genitourinary, 0% and 1.5% for gastrointestinal events. No grade 4 acute or late toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: WP SIB‐IMRT can be safely administered to patients with pelvic node‐positive prostate cancer. Since grade group 5 and detectable nadir PSA levels are risks for castration resistance, we may need to increase the intensity of treatment for such cases. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10134326/ /pubmed/36536528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5554 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Nakamura, Kiyonao
Norihisa, Yoshiki
Ikeda, Itaru
Inokuchi, Haruo
Aizawa, Rihito
Kamoto, Toshiyuki
Kamba, Tomomi
Inoue, Takahiro
Yamasaki, Toshinari
Akamatsu, Shusuke
Kobayashi, Takashi
Ogawa, Osamu
Mizowaki, Takashi
Ten‐year outcomes of whole‐pelvic intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer with regional lymph node metastasis
title Ten‐year outcomes of whole‐pelvic intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer with regional lymph node metastasis
title_full Ten‐year outcomes of whole‐pelvic intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer with regional lymph node metastasis
title_fullStr Ten‐year outcomes of whole‐pelvic intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer with regional lymph node metastasis
title_full_unstemmed Ten‐year outcomes of whole‐pelvic intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer with regional lymph node metastasis
title_short Ten‐year outcomes of whole‐pelvic intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer with regional lymph node metastasis
title_sort ten‐year outcomes of whole‐pelvic intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer with regional lymph node metastasis
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5554
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamurakiyonao tenyearoutcomesofwholepelvicintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancerwithregionallymphnodemetastasis
AT norihisayoshiki tenyearoutcomesofwholepelvicintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancerwithregionallymphnodemetastasis
AT ikedaitaru tenyearoutcomesofwholepelvicintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancerwithregionallymphnodemetastasis
AT inokuchiharuo tenyearoutcomesofwholepelvicintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancerwithregionallymphnodemetastasis
AT aizawarihito tenyearoutcomesofwholepelvicintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancerwithregionallymphnodemetastasis
AT kamototoshiyuki tenyearoutcomesofwholepelvicintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancerwithregionallymphnodemetastasis
AT kambatomomi tenyearoutcomesofwholepelvicintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancerwithregionallymphnodemetastasis
AT inouetakahiro tenyearoutcomesofwholepelvicintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancerwithregionallymphnodemetastasis
AT yamasakitoshinari tenyearoutcomesofwholepelvicintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancerwithregionallymphnodemetastasis
AT akamatsushusuke tenyearoutcomesofwholepelvicintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancerwithregionallymphnodemetastasis
AT kobayashitakashi tenyearoutcomesofwholepelvicintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancerwithregionallymphnodemetastasis
AT ogawaosamu tenyearoutcomesofwholepelvicintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancerwithregionallymphnodemetastasis
AT mizowakitakashi tenyearoutcomesofwholepelvicintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancerwithregionallymphnodemetastasis