Cargando…

Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study

BACKGROUND: It is not well understood the overall changes that multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have had to make in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, nor the impact that such changes, in addition to the other challenges faced by MDTs, have had on decision‐making, communication, or participation in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soukup, Tayana, Winters, David, Chua, Kia‐Chong, Rowland, Philip, Moneke, Jacqueline, Skolarus, Ted A., Bharathan, Rasiah, Harling, Leanne, Bali, Anish, Asher, Viren, Gandamihardja, Tasha, Sevdalis, Nick, Green, James S. A., Lamb, Benjamin W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5608
_version_ 1785031748213538816
author Soukup, Tayana
Winters, David
Chua, Kia‐Chong
Rowland, Philip
Moneke, Jacqueline
Skolarus, Ted A.
Bharathan, Rasiah
Harling, Leanne
Bali, Anish
Asher, Viren
Gandamihardja, Tasha
Sevdalis, Nick
Green, James S. A.
Lamb, Benjamin W.
author_facet Soukup, Tayana
Winters, David
Chua, Kia‐Chong
Rowland, Philip
Moneke, Jacqueline
Skolarus, Ted A.
Bharathan, Rasiah
Harling, Leanne
Bali, Anish
Asher, Viren
Gandamihardja, Tasha
Sevdalis, Nick
Green, James S. A.
Lamb, Benjamin W.
author_sort Soukup, Tayana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is not well understood the overall changes that multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have had to make in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, nor the impact that such changes, in addition to the other challenges faced by MDTs, have had on decision‐making, communication, or participation in the context of MDT meetings specifically. METHODS: This was a mixed method, prospective cross‐sectional survey study taking place in the United Kingdom between September 2020 and August 2021. RESULTS: The participants were 423 MDT members. Qualitative findings revealed hybrid working and possibility of virtual attendance as the change introduced because of COVID‐19 that MDTs would like to maintain. However, IT‐related issues, slower meetings, longer lists and delays were identified as common with improving of the IT infrastructure necessary going forward. In contrast, virtual meetings and increased attendance/availability of clinicians were highlighted as the positive outcomes resulting from the change. Quantitative findings showed significant improvement from before COVID‐19 for MDT meeting organisation and logistics (M = 45, SD = 20) compared to the access (M = 50, SD = 12, t(390) = 5.028, p = 0.001), case discussions (M = 50, SD = 14, t(373) = −5.104, p = 0.001), and patient representation (M = 50, SD = 12, t(382) = −4.537, p = 0.001) at MDT meetings. DISCUSSION: Our study explored the perception of change since COVID‐19 among cancer MDTs using mixed methods. While hybrid working was preferred, challenges exist. Significant improvements in the meeting organisation and logistics were reported. Although we found no significant perceived worsening across the four domains investigated, there was an indication in this direction for the case discussions warranting further ‘live’ assessments of MDT meetings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101343652023-04-28 Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study Soukup, Tayana Winters, David Chua, Kia‐Chong Rowland, Philip Moneke, Jacqueline Skolarus, Ted A. Bharathan, Rasiah Harling, Leanne Bali, Anish Asher, Viren Gandamihardja, Tasha Sevdalis, Nick Green, James S. A. Lamb, Benjamin W. Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: It is not well understood the overall changes that multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have had to make in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, nor the impact that such changes, in addition to the other challenges faced by MDTs, have had on decision‐making, communication, or participation in the context of MDT meetings specifically. METHODS: This was a mixed method, prospective cross‐sectional survey study taking place in the United Kingdom between September 2020 and August 2021. RESULTS: The participants were 423 MDT members. Qualitative findings revealed hybrid working and possibility of virtual attendance as the change introduced because of COVID‐19 that MDTs would like to maintain. However, IT‐related issues, slower meetings, longer lists and delays were identified as common with improving of the IT infrastructure necessary going forward. In contrast, virtual meetings and increased attendance/availability of clinicians were highlighted as the positive outcomes resulting from the change. Quantitative findings showed significant improvement from before COVID‐19 for MDT meeting organisation and logistics (M = 45, SD = 20) compared to the access (M = 50, SD = 12, t(390) = 5.028, p = 0.001), case discussions (M = 50, SD = 14, t(373) = −5.104, p = 0.001), and patient representation (M = 50, SD = 12, t(382) = −4.537, p = 0.001) at MDT meetings. DISCUSSION: Our study explored the perception of change since COVID‐19 among cancer MDTs using mixed methods. While hybrid working was preferred, challenges exist. Significant improvements in the meeting organisation and logistics were reported. Although we found no significant perceived worsening across the four domains investigated, there was an indication in this direction for the case discussions warranting further ‘live’ assessments of MDT meetings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10134365/ /pubmed/36647755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5608 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Soukup, Tayana
Winters, David
Chua, Kia‐Chong
Rowland, Philip
Moneke, Jacqueline
Skolarus, Ted A.
Bharathan, Rasiah
Harling, Leanne
Bali, Anish
Asher, Viren
Gandamihardja, Tasha
Sevdalis, Nick
Green, James S. A.
Lamb, Benjamin W.
Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study
title Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study
title_full Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study
title_fullStr Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study
title_short Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study
title_sort evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the covid‐19 pandemic: a national mixed‐method survey study
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5608
work_keys_str_mv AT soukuptayana evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy
AT wintersdavid evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy
AT chuakiachong evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy
AT rowlandphilip evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy
AT monekejacqueline evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy
AT skolarusteda evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy
AT bharathanrasiah evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy
AT harlingleanne evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy
AT balianish evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy
AT asherviren evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy
AT gandamihardjatasha evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy
AT sevdalisnick evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy
AT greenjamessa evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy
AT lambbenjaminw evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy