Cargando…
Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study
BACKGROUND: It is not well understood the overall changes that multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have had to make in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, nor the impact that such changes, in addition to the other challenges faced by MDTs, have had on decision‐making, communication, or participation in th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5608 |
_version_ | 1785031748213538816 |
---|---|
author | Soukup, Tayana Winters, David Chua, Kia‐Chong Rowland, Philip Moneke, Jacqueline Skolarus, Ted A. Bharathan, Rasiah Harling, Leanne Bali, Anish Asher, Viren Gandamihardja, Tasha Sevdalis, Nick Green, James S. A. Lamb, Benjamin W. |
author_facet | Soukup, Tayana Winters, David Chua, Kia‐Chong Rowland, Philip Moneke, Jacqueline Skolarus, Ted A. Bharathan, Rasiah Harling, Leanne Bali, Anish Asher, Viren Gandamihardja, Tasha Sevdalis, Nick Green, James S. A. Lamb, Benjamin W. |
author_sort | Soukup, Tayana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is not well understood the overall changes that multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have had to make in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, nor the impact that such changes, in addition to the other challenges faced by MDTs, have had on decision‐making, communication, or participation in the context of MDT meetings specifically. METHODS: This was a mixed method, prospective cross‐sectional survey study taking place in the United Kingdom between September 2020 and August 2021. RESULTS: The participants were 423 MDT members. Qualitative findings revealed hybrid working and possibility of virtual attendance as the change introduced because of COVID‐19 that MDTs would like to maintain. However, IT‐related issues, slower meetings, longer lists and delays were identified as common with improving of the IT infrastructure necessary going forward. In contrast, virtual meetings and increased attendance/availability of clinicians were highlighted as the positive outcomes resulting from the change. Quantitative findings showed significant improvement from before COVID‐19 for MDT meeting organisation and logistics (M = 45, SD = 20) compared to the access (M = 50, SD = 12, t(390) = 5.028, p = 0.001), case discussions (M = 50, SD = 14, t(373) = −5.104, p = 0.001), and patient representation (M = 50, SD = 12, t(382) = −4.537, p = 0.001) at MDT meetings. DISCUSSION: Our study explored the perception of change since COVID‐19 among cancer MDTs using mixed methods. While hybrid working was preferred, challenges exist. Significant improvements in the meeting organisation and logistics were reported. Although we found no significant perceived worsening across the four domains investigated, there was an indication in this direction for the case discussions warranting further ‘live’ assessments of MDT meetings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10134365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101343652023-04-28 Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study Soukup, Tayana Winters, David Chua, Kia‐Chong Rowland, Philip Moneke, Jacqueline Skolarus, Ted A. Bharathan, Rasiah Harling, Leanne Bali, Anish Asher, Viren Gandamihardja, Tasha Sevdalis, Nick Green, James S. A. Lamb, Benjamin W. Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: It is not well understood the overall changes that multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have had to make in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, nor the impact that such changes, in addition to the other challenges faced by MDTs, have had on decision‐making, communication, or participation in the context of MDT meetings specifically. METHODS: This was a mixed method, prospective cross‐sectional survey study taking place in the United Kingdom between September 2020 and August 2021. RESULTS: The participants were 423 MDT members. Qualitative findings revealed hybrid working and possibility of virtual attendance as the change introduced because of COVID‐19 that MDTs would like to maintain. However, IT‐related issues, slower meetings, longer lists and delays were identified as common with improving of the IT infrastructure necessary going forward. In contrast, virtual meetings and increased attendance/availability of clinicians were highlighted as the positive outcomes resulting from the change. Quantitative findings showed significant improvement from before COVID‐19 for MDT meeting organisation and logistics (M = 45, SD = 20) compared to the access (M = 50, SD = 12, t(390) = 5.028, p = 0.001), case discussions (M = 50, SD = 14, t(373) = −5.104, p = 0.001), and patient representation (M = 50, SD = 12, t(382) = −4.537, p = 0.001) at MDT meetings. DISCUSSION: Our study explored the perception of change since COVID‐19 among cancer MDTs using mixed methods. While hybrid working was preferred, challenges exist. Significant improvements in the meeting organisation and logistics were reported. Although we found no significant perceived worsening across the four domains investigated, there was an indication in this direction for the case discussions warranting further ‘live’ assessments of MDT meetings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10134365/ /pubmed/36647755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5608 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Soukup, Tayana Winters, David Chua, Kia‐Chong Rowland, Philip Moneke, Jacqueline Skolarus, Ted A. Bharathan, Rasiah Harling, Leanne Bali, Anish Asher, Viren Gandamihardja, Tasha Sevdalis, Nick Green, James S. A. Lamb, Benjamin W. Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study |
title | Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study |
title_full | Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study |
title_short | Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study |
title_sort | evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the covid‐19 pandemic: a national mixed‐method survey study |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5608 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soukuptayana evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy AT wintersdavid evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy AT chuakiachong evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy AT rowlandphilip evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy AT monekejacqueline evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy AT skolarusteda evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy AT bharathanrasiah evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy AT harlingleanne evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy AT balianish evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy AT asherviren evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy AT gandamihardjatasha evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy AT sevdalisnick evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy AT greenjamessa evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy AT lambbenjaminw evaluationofchangestoworkpatternsinmultidisciplinarycancerteammeetingsduetothecovid19pandemicanationalmixedmethodsurveystudy |