Cargando…

Multifocal/multicentric breast cancer: Does each focus matter?

BACKGROUND: Multifocal (MF) and multicentric (MC) breast cancer cases have been increasingly diagnosed owing to the extensive use of improved preoperative breast imaging. The current tumor‐node‐metastasis staging system uses the dimension of the largest tumor and recommends reporting the pathologica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tong, Ying, Sun, Feixiang, Zhang, Chuanpeng, Yang, Susu, Yu, Ziyi, Zhao, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36734288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5626
_version_ 1785031752283062272
author Tong, Ying
Sun, Feixiang
Zhang, Chuanpeng
Yang, Susu
Yu, Ziyi
Zhao, Yi
author_facet Tong, Ying
Sun, Feixiang
Zhang, Chuanpeng
Yang, Susu
Yu, Ziyi
Zhao, Yi
author_sort Tong, Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multifocal (MF) and multicentric (MC) breast cancer cases have been increasingly diagnosed owing to the extensive use of improved preoperative breast imaging. The current tumor‐node‐metastasis staging system uses the dimension of the largest tumor and recommends reporting the pathological features of the largest tumor in MF/MC breast cancers. AIM: This study aimed to explore whether the largest or aggregate dimensions of MF and MC breast cancers can better predict tumor behavior. We also attempted to study the histological and biological heterogeneities of separate foci in MF and MC breast cancers to determine whether it was necessary to examine each lesion. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 121 patients with MF/MC (103 with MF and 18 with MC) breast cancers and 484 patients with unifocal breast cancer who were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Two methods were used to record the T stage (using the dimensions of the largest lesion and aggregate dimensions of all lesions). The histological grade, immunohistochemical parameters, and molecular subtypes of the largest lesion and other lesions in MF/MC breast cancers were studied to assess intertumoral heterogeneity. RESULTS: The use of aggregate dimensions upstaged 63 patients with MF/MC breast cancers to a more advanced stage and removed the independent effect of cancer multiplicity on lymph node positivity compared with the use of the largest dimension. Mismatches were found in the pathological type (9.9%), histological grade (4.1%), and molecular subtype (8.3%) among different foci. CONCLUSION: The tendency of MF/MC breast tumors to metastasize may be related to tumor load, which can be better predicted by the aggregate dimensions of all foci. The use of the current staging systems may require further evaluation and modification. Intertumoral heterogeneity indicates the necessity for pathological and immunohistochemical assessments of each lesion in patients with MF/MC breast cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101343822023-04-28 Multifocal/multicentric breast cancer: Does each focus matter? Tong, Ying Sun, Feixiang Zhang, Chuanpeng Yang, Susu Yu, Ziyi Zhao, Yi Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Multifocal (MF) and multicentric (MC) breast cancer cases have been increasingly diagnosed owing to the extensive use of improved preoperative breast imaging. The current tumor‐node‐metastasis staging system uses the dimension of the largest tumor and recommends reporting the pathological features of the largest tumor in MF/MC breast cancers. AIM: This study aimed to explore whether the largest or aggregate dimensions of MF and MC breast cancers can better predict tumor behavior. We also attempted to study the histological and biological heterogeneities of separate foci in MF and MC breast cancers to determine whether it was necessary to examine each lesion. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 121 patients with MF/MC (103 with MF and 18 with MC) breast cancers and 484 patients with unifocal breast cancer who were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Two methods were used to record the T stage (using the dimensions of the largest lesion and aggregate dimensions of all lesions). The histological grade, immunohistochemical parameters, and molecular subtypes of the largest lesion and other lesions in MF/MC breast cancers were studied to assess intertumoral heterogeneity. RESULTS: The use of aggregate dimensions upstaged 63 patients with MF/MC breast cancers to a more advanced stage and removed the independent effect of cancer multiplicity on lymph node positivity compared with the use of the largest dimension. Mismatches were found in the pathological type (9.9%), histological grade (4.1%), and molecular subtype (8.3%) among different foci. CONCLUSION: The tendency of MF/MC breast tumors to metastasize may be related to tumor load, which can be better predicted by the aggregate dimensions of all foci. The use of the current staging systems may require further evaluation and modification. Intertumoral heterogeneity indicates the necessity for pathological and immunohistochemical assessments of each lesion in patients with MF/MC breast cancers. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10134382/ /pubmed/36734288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5626 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Tong, Ying
Sun, Feixiang
Zhang, Chuanpeng
Yang, Susu
Yu, Ziyi
Zhao, Yi
Multifocal/multicentric breast cancer: Does each focus matter?
title Multifocal/multicentric breast cancer: Does each focus matter?
title_full Multifocal/multicentric breast cancer: Does each focus matter?
title_fullStr Multifocal/multicentric breast cancer: Does each focus matter?
title_full_unstemmed Multifocal/multicentric breast cancer: Does each focus matter?
title_short Multifocal/multicentric breast cancer: Does each focus matter?
title_sort multifocal/multicentric breast cancer: does each focus matter?
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36734288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5626
work_keys_str_mv AT tongying multifocalmulticentricbreastcancerdoeseachfocusmatter
AT sunfeixiang multifocalmulticentricbreastcancerdoeseachfocusmatter
AT zhangchuanpeng multifocalmulticentricbreastcancerdoeseachfocusmatter
AT yangsusu multifocalmulticentricbreastcancerdoeseachfocusmatter
AT yuziyi multifocalmulticentricbreastcancerdoeseachfocusmatter
AT zhaoyi multifocalmulticentricbreastcancerdoeseachfocusmatter