Cargando…

The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND: Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is an important cause of heart failure in patients with a right ventricular pacing burden. Recent evidence suggests that an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may confer benefit in PICM. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent and identify pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kerley, Robert N., O’Dowling, Claire, Campos, Filipa, Murphy, Robbie D., Walsh, Katie A., Fahy, Gerard J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.01.004
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is an important cause of heart failure in patients with a right ventricular pacing burden. Recent evidence suggests that an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may confer benefit in PICM. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent and identify predictors of improvement following upgrade to CRT in patients with PICM. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients undergoing CRT upgrade for PICM over the 10-year period of 2011 to 2021 at our center. All patients with PICM who underwent device upgrade from a dual- or single-chamber ventricular pacemaker to CRT were included. PICM was defined as a decrease of ≥10% in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), resulting in an LVEF <50% among patients with ≥20% Right ventricular pacing burden without an alternative cause for cardiomyopathy. RESULTS: LVEF significantly improved from 28.7% preupgrade to 44.3% post–CRT upgrade (P < .01). Of 37 patients with severe LV dysfunction, 34 (91.9%) improved to an LVEF >35% and 13 (35.1%) improved to an LVEF >50%. The LV end-diastolic diameter decreased from 5.9 cm preupgrade to 5.4 cm postupgrade (P < .01). Using linear regression, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use was associated with significant LVEF improvement (+7.21%, P = .05). We observed a low rate of complications, and 1 in 4 CRT upgrades required venoplasty (n = 10 of 43, 23.3%). CONCLUSION: We provide further evidence for the benefit of CRT upgrade in the management of patients with PICM.