Cargando…
The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
BACKGROUND: Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is an important cause of heart failure in patients with a right ventricular pacing burden. Recent evidence suggests that an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may confer benefit in PICM. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent and identify pre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.01.004 |
_version_ | 1785031753745825792 |
---|---|
author | Kerley, Robert N. O’Dowling, Claire Campos, Filipa Murphy, Robbie D. Walsh, Katie A. Fahy, Gerard J. |
author_facet | Kerley, Robert N. O’Dowling, Claire Campos, Filipa Murphy, Robbie D. Walsh, Katie A. Fahy, Gerard J. |
author_sort | Kerley, Robert N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is an important cause of heart failure in patients with a right ventricular pacing burden. Recent evidence suggests that an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may confer benefit in PICM. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent and identify predictors of improvement following upgrade to CRT in patients with PICM. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients undergoing CRT upgrade for PICM over the 10-year period of 2011 to 2021 at our center. All patients with PICM who underwent device upgrade from a dual- or single-chamber ventricular pacemaker to CRT were included. PICM was defined as a decrease of ≥10% in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), resulting in an LVEF <50% among patients with ≥20% Right ventricular pacing burden without an alternative cause for cardiomyopathy. RESULTS: LVEF significantly improved from 28.7% preupgrade to 44.3% post–CRT upgrade (P < .01). Of 37 patients with severe LV dysfunction, 34 (91.9%) improved to an LVEF >35% and 13 (35.1%) improved to an LVEF >50%. The LV end-diastolic diameter decreased from 5.9 cm preupgrade to 5.4 cm postupgrade (P < .01). Using linear regression, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use was associated with significant LVEF improvement (+7.21%, P = .05). We observed a low rate of complications, and 1 in 4 CRT upgrades required venoplasty (n = 10 of 43, 23.3%). CONCLUSION: We provide further evidence for the benefit of CRT upgrade in the management of patients with PICM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10134389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101343892023-04-28 The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy Kerley, Robert N. O’Dowling, Claire Campos, Filipa Murphy, Robbie D. Walsh, Katie A. Fahy, Gerard J. Heart Rhythm O2 Clinical BACKGROUND: Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is an important cause of heart failure in patients with a right ventricular pacing burden. Recent evidence suggests that an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may confer benefit in PICM. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent and identify predictors of improvement following upgrade to CRT in patients with PICM. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients undergoing CRT upgrade for PICM over the 10-year period of 2011 to 2021 at our center. All patients with PICM who underwent device upgrade from a dual- or single-chamber ventricular pacemaker to CRT were included. PICM was defined as a decrease of ≥10% in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), resulting in an LVEF <50% among patients with ≥20% Right ventricular pacing burden without an alternative cause for cardiomyopathy. RESULTS: LVEF significantly improved from 28.7% preupgrade to 44.3% post–CRT upgrade (P < .01). Of 37 patients with severe LV dysfunction, 34 (91.9%) improved to an LVEF >35% and 13 (35.1%) improved to an LVEF >50%. The LV end-diastolic diameter decreased from 5.9 cm preupgrade to 5.4 cm postupgrade (P < .01). Using linear regression, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use was associated with significant LVEF improvement (+7.21%, P = .05). We observed a low rate of complications, and 1 in 4 CRT upgrades required venoplasty (n = 10 of 43, 23.3%). CONCLUSION: We provide further evidence for the benefit of CRT upgrade in the management of patients with PICM. Elsevier 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10134389/ /pubmed/37124556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.01.004 Text en © 2023 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Kerley, Robert N. O’Dowling, Claire Campos, Filipa Murphy, Robbie D. Walsh, Katie A. Fahy, Gerard J. The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy |
title | The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy |
title_full | The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy |
title_fullStr | The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy |
title_full_unstemmed | The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy |
title_short | The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy |
title_sort | therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy |
topic | Clinical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.01.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kerleyrobertn thetherapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy AT odowlingclaire thetherapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy AT camposfilipa thetherapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy AT murphyrobbied thetherapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy AT walshkatiea thetherapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy AT fahygerardj thetherapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy AT kerleyrobertn therapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy AT odowlingclaire therapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy AT camposfilipa therapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy AT murphyrobbied therapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy AT walshkatiea therapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy AT fahygerardj therapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy |