Cargando…

The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND: Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is an important cause of heart failure in patients with a right ventricular pacing burden. Recent evidence suggests that an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may confer benefit in PICM. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent and identify pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kerley, Robert N., O’Dowling, Claire, Campos, Filipa, Murphy, Robbie D., Walsh, Katie A., Fahy, Gerard J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.01.004
_version_ 1785031753745825792
author Kerley, Robert N.
O’Dowling, Claire
Campos, Filipa
Murphy, Robbie D.
Walsh, Katie A.
Fahy, Gerard J.
author_facet Kerley, Robert N.
O’Dowling, Claire
Campos, Filipa
Murphy, Robbie D.
Walsh, Katie A.
Fahy, Gerard J.
author_sort Kerley, Robert N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is an important cause of heart failure in patients with a right ventricular pacing burden. Recent evidence suggests that an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may confer benefit in PICM. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent and identify predictors of improvement following upgrade to CRT in patients with PICM. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients undergoing CRT upgrade for PICM over the 10-year period of 2011 to 2021 at our center. All patients with PICM who underwent device upgrade from a dual- or single-chamber ventricular pacemaker to CRT were included. PICM was defined as a decrease of ≥10% in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), resulting in an LVEF <50% among patients with ≥20% Right ventricular pacing burden without an alternative cause for cardiomyopathy. RESULTS: LVEF significantly improved from 28.7% preupgrade to 44.3% post–CRT upgrade (P < .01). Of 37 patients with severe LV dysfunction, 34 (91.9%) improved to an LVEF >35% and 13 (35.1%) improved to an LVEF >50%. The LV end-diastolic diameter decreased from 5.9 cm preupgrade to 5.4 cm postupgrade (P < .01). Using linear regression, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use was associated with significant LVEF improvement (+7.21%, P = .05). We observed a low rate of complications, and 1 in 4 CRT upgrades required venoplasty (n = 10 of 43, 23.3%). CONCLUSION: We provide further evidence for the benefit of CRT upgrade in the management of patients with PICM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101343892023-04-28 The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy Kerley, Robert N. O’Dowling, Claire Campos, Filipa Murphy, Robbie D. Walsh, Katie A. Fahy, Gerard J. Heart Rhythm O2 Clinical BACKGROUND: Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is an important cause of heart failure in patients with a right ventricular pacing burden. Recent evidence suggests that an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may confer benefit in PICM. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent and identify predictors of improvement following upgrade to CRT in patients with PICM. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients undergoing CRT upgrade for PICM over the 10-year period of 2011 to 2021 at our center. All patients with PICM who underwent device upgrade from a dual- or single-chamber ventricular pacemaker to CRT were included. PICM was defined as a decrease of ≥10% in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), resulting in an LVEF <50% among patients with ≥20% Right ventricular pacing burden without an alternative cause for cardiomyopathy. RESULTS: LVEF significantly improved from 28.7% preupgrade to 44.3% post–CRT upgrade (P < .01). Of 37 patients with severe LV dysfunction, 34 (91.9%) improved to an LVEF >35% and 13 (35.1%) improved to an LVEF >50%. The LV end-diastolic diameter decreased from 5.9 cm preupgrade to 5.4 cm postupgrade (P < .01). Using linear regression, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use was associated with significant LVEF improvement (+7.21%, P = .05). We observed a low rate of complications, and 1 in 4 CRT upgrades required venoplasty (n = 10 of 43, 23.3%). CONCLUSION: We provide further evidence for the benefit of CRT upgrade in the management of patients with PICM. Elsevier 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10134389/ /pubmed/37124556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.01.004 Text en © 2023 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical
Kerley, Robert N.
O’Dowling, Claire
Campos, Filipa
Murphy, Robbie D.
Walsh, Katie A.
Fahy, Gerard J.
The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
title The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
title_full The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
title_fullStr The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
title_full_unstemmed The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
title_short The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
title_sort therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.01.004
work_keys_str_mv AT kerleyrobertn thetherapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy
AT odowlingclaire thetherapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy
AT camposfilipa thetherapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy
AT murphyrobbied thetherapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy
AT walshkatiea thetherapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy
AT fahygerardj thetherapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy
AT kerleyrobertn therapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy
AT odowlingclaire therapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy
AT camposfilipa therapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy
AT murphyrobbied therapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy
AT walshkatiea therapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy
AT fahygerardj therapeuticbenefitofupgradetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathy