Cargando…

Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three-dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to: (i) review and provide a narrative synthesis of three-dimensional (3D) foot surface scanning methodological and statistical analysis protocols, and (ii) develop a set of recommendations for standardising the reporting of 3D foot scanning approaches. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allan, Jamie J., Munteanu, Shannon E., Bonanno, Daniel R., Buldt, Andrew K., Choppin, Simon, Bullas, Alice, Pearce, Natalie, Menz, Hylton B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00617-z
_version_ 1785031794336202752
author Allan, Jamie J.
Munteanu, Shannon E.
Bonanno, Daniel R.
Buldt, Andrew K.
Choppin, Simon
Bullas, Alice
Pearce, Natalie
Menz, Hylton B.
author_facet Allan, Jamie J.
Munteanu, Shannon E.
Bonanno, Daniel R.
Buldt, Andrew K.
Choppin, Simon
Bullas, Alice
Pearce, Natalie
Menz, Hylton B.
author_sort Allan, Jamie J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to: (i) review and provide a narrative synthesis of three-dimensional (3D) foot surface scanning methodological and statistical analysis protocols, and (ii) develop a set of recommendations for standardising the reporting of 3D foot scanning approaches. METHODS: A systematic search of the SCOPUS, ProQuest, and Web of Science databases were conducted to identify papers reporting 3D foot scanning protocols and analysis techniques. To be included, studies were required to be published in English, have more than ten participants, and involve the use of static 3D surface scans of the foot. Papers were excluded if they reported two-dimensional footprints only, 3D scans that did not include the medial arch, dynamic scans, or derived foot data from a full body scan. RESULTS: The search yielded 78 relevant studies from 17 different countries. The available evidence showed a large variation in scanning protocols. The subcategories displaying the most variation included scanner specifications (model, type, accuracy, resolution, capture duration), scanning conditions (markers, weightbearing, number of scans), foot measurements and definitions used, and statistical analysis approaches. A 16-item checklist was developed to improve the consistency of reporting of future 3D scanning studies. CONCLUSION: 3D foot scanning methodological and statistical analysis protocol consistency and reporting has been lacking in the literature to date. Improved reporting of the included subcategories could assist in data pooling and facilitate collaboration between researchers. As a result, larger sample sizes and diversification of population groups could be obtained to vastly improve the quantification of foot shape and inform the development of orthotic and footwear interventions and products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101345892023-04-28 Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three-dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review Allan, Jamie J. Munteanu, Shannon E. Bonanno, Daniel R. Buldt, Andrew K. Choppin, Simon Bullas, Alice Pearce, Natalie Menz, Hylton B. J Foot Ankle Res Review OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to: (i) review and provide a narrative synthesis of three-dimensional (3D) foot surface scanning methodological and statistical analysis protocols, and (ii) develop a set of recommendations for standardising the reporting of 3D foot scanning approaches. METHODS: A systematic search of the SCOPUS, ProQuest, and Web of Science databases were conducted to identify papers reporting 3D foot scanning protocols and analysis techniques. To be included, studies were required to be published in English, have more than ten participants, and involve the use of static 3D surface scans of the foot. Papers were excluded if they reported two-dimensional footprints only, 3D scans that did not include the medial arch, dynamic scans, or derived foot data from a full body scan. RESULTS: The search yielded 78 relevant studies from 17 different countries. The available evidence showed a large variation in scanning protocols. The subcategories displaying the most variation included scanner specifications (model, type, accuracy, resolution, capture duration), scanning conditions (markers, weightbearing, number of scans), foot measurements and definitions used, and statistical analysis approaches. A 16-item checklist was developed to improve the consistency of reporting of future 3D scanning studies. CONCLUSION: 3D foot scanning methodological and statistical analysis protocol consistency and reporting has been lacking in the literature to date. Improved reporting of the included subcategories could assist in data pooling and facilitate collaboration between researchers. As a result, larger sample sizes and diversification of population groups could be obtained to vastly improve the quantification of foot shape and inform the development of orthotic and footwear interventions and products. BioMed Central 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10134589/ /pubmed/37106385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00617-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Allan, Jamie J.
Munteanu, Shannon E.
Bonanno, Daniel R.
Buldt, Andrew K.
Choppin, Simon
Bullas, Alice
Pearce, Natalie
Menz, Hylton B.
Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three-dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review
title Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three-dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review
title_full Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three-dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review
title_fullStr Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three-dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three-dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review
title_short Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three-dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review
title_sort methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three-dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00617-z
work_keys_str_mv AT allanjamiej methodologicalandstatisticalapproachesfortheassessmentoffootshapeusingthreedimensionalfootscanningascopingreview
AT munteanushannone methodologicalandstatisticalapproachesfortheassessmentoffootshapeusingthreedimensionalfootscanningascopingreview
AT bonannodanielr methodologicalandstatisticalapproachesfortheassessmentoffootshapeusingthreedimensionalfootscanningascopingreview
AT buldtandrewk methodologicalandstatisticalapproachesfortheassessmentoffootshapeusingthreedimensionalfootscanningascopingreview
AT choppinsimon methodologicalandstatisticalapproachesfortheassessmentoffootshapeusingthreedimensionalfootscanningascopingreview
AT bullasalice methodologicalandstatisticalapproachesfortheassessmentoffootshapeusingthreedimensionalfootscanningascopingreview
AT pearcenatalie methodologicalandstatisticalapproachesfortheassessmentoffootshapeusingthreedimensionalfootscanningascopingreview
AT menzhyltonb methodologicalandstatisticalapproachesfortheassessmentoffootshapeusingthreedimensionalfootscanningascopingreview