Cargando…
Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section
BACKGROUND: Neonatal health at delivery as measured by apgar scores is an important outcome. This study was done to assess the impact of anesthesia on Apgar 1-minute and 5-minute scores of infants delivered through elective cesarean section in Zimbabwe. METHODS: We carried out a secondary analysis o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02098-w |
_version_ | 1785031798581886976 |
---|---|
author | Gwanzura, Chipo Gavi, Samuel Mangiza, Marcia Moyo, Faith Vhenekai Lohman, Matthew C. Nhemachena, Taazadza Chipato, Tsungai |
author_facet | Gwanzura, Chipo Gavi, Samuel Mangiza, Marcia Moyo, Faith Vhenekai Lohman, Matthew C. Nhemachena, Taazadza Chipato, Tsungai |
author_sort | Gwanzura, Chipo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neonatal health at delivery as measured by apgar scores is an important outcome. This study was done to assess the impact of anesthesia on Apgar 1-minute and 5-minute scores of infants delivered through elective cesarean section in Zimbabwe. METHODS: We carried out a secondary analysis of data from the Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage (ETAPPH) clinical trial in Zimbabwe. Outcomes measured were infant Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, exposure was the administration of either a general (intravenous propofol/ketamine/sodium thiopental) or spinal (hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%) anesthesia for anesthesia during the elective cesarean section procedure. Marginal Structural Logistic Modelling (MSM) using an unstabilized Inverse Probability Treatment Weight (IPTW) estimator was used to assess the relationship between anesthetic administration method and infant Apgar scores. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-one (421) women who had an elective caesarean section in the ETAPPH study had their infants assessed for Apgar scores. Comparing general anesthesia to spinal anesthesia, spinal anesthesia was related to good Apgar scores at 1-minute (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.0, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.5–10.7, sensitivity analysis E-value = 3.41). Spinal anesthetic administration was also related to good Apgar scores at 5 min (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.2, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.6–23.1, sensitivity analysis E-value = 4.42). CONCLUSIONS: When providing anesthesia for patients undergoing elective cesarean section, care should be taken on the method of administration of anesthetic agents. General anesthesia tends to depress Apgar scores at 1 min, although most neonates recover and have better scores at 5 min. Spinal anesthesia should be the first choice whenever possible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The clinical trial from which data of this study was abstracted was registered under clinical trials registration number NCT04733157. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10134612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101346122023-04-28 Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section Gwanzura, Chipo Gavi, Samuel Mangiza, Marcia Moyo, Faith Vhenekai Lohman, Matthew C. Nhemachena, Taazadza Chipato, Tsungai BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Neonatal health at delivery as measured by apgar scores is an important outcome. This study was done to assess the impact of anesthesia on Apgar 1-minute and 5-minute scores of infants delivered through elective cesarean section in Zimbabwe. METHODS: We carried out a secondary analysis of data from the Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage (ETAPPH) clinical trial in Zimbabwe. Outcomes measured were infant Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, exposure was the administration of either a general (intravenous propofol/ketamine/sodium thiopental) or spinal (hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%) anesthesia for anesthesia during the elective cesarean section procedure. Marginal Structural Logistic Modelling (MSM) using an unstabilized Inverse Probability Treatment Weight (IPTW) estimator was used to assess the relationship between anesthetic administration method and infant Apgar scores. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-one (421) women who had an elective caesarean section in the ETAPPH study had their infants assessed for Apgar scores. Comparing general anesthesia to spinal anesthesia, spinal anesthesia was related to good Apgar scores at 1-minute (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.0, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.5–10.7, sensitivity analysis E-value = 3.41). Spinal anesthetic administration was also related to good Apgar scores at 5 min (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.2, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.6–23.1, sensitivity analysis E-value = 4.42). CONCLUSIONS: When providing anesthesia for patients undergoing elective cesarean section, care should be taken on the method of administration of anesthetic agents. General anesthesia tends to depress Apgar scores at 1 min, although most neonates recover and have better scores at 5 min. Spinal anesthesia should be the first choice whenever possible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The clinical trial from which data of this study was abstracted was registered under clinical trials registration number NCT04733157. BioMed Central 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10134612/ /pubmed/37106343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02098-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Gwanzura, Chipo Gavi, Samuel Mangiza, Marcia Moyo, Faith Vhenekai Lohman, Matthew C. Nhemachena, Taazadza Chipato, Tsungai Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section |
title | Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section |
title_full | Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section |
title_fullStr | Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section |
title_short | Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section |
title_sort | effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02098-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gwanzurachipo effectofanesthesiaadministrationmethodonapgarscoresofinfantsborntowomenundergoingelectivecesareansection AT gavisamuel effectofanesthesiaadministrationmethodonapgarscoresofinfantsborntowomenundergoingelectivecesareansection AT mangizamarcia effectofanesthesiaadministrationmethodonapgarscoresofinfantsborntowomenundergoingelectivecesareansection AT moyofaithvhenekai effectofanesthesiaadministrationmethodonapgarscoresofinfantsborntowomenundergoingelectivecesareansection AT lohmanmatthewc effectofanesthesiaadministrationmethodonapgarscoresofinfantsborntowomenundergoingelectivecesareansection AT nhemachenataazadza effectofanesthesiaadministrationmethodonapgarscoresofinfantsborntowomenundergoingelectivecesareansection AT chipatotsungai effectofanesthesiaadministrationmethodonapgarscoresofinfantsborntowomenundergoingelectivecesareansection |