Cargando…

Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section

BACKGROUND: Neonatal health at delivery as measured by apgar scores is an important outcome. This study was done to assess the impact of anesthesia on Apgar 1-minute and 5-minute scores of infants delivered through elective cesarean section in Zimbabwe. METHODS: We carried out a secondary analysis o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gwanzura, Chipo, Gavi, Samuel, Mangiza, Marcia, Moyo, Faith Vhenekai, Lohman, Matthew C., Nhemachena, Taazadza, Chipato, Tsungai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02098-w
_version_ 1785031798581886976
author Gwanzura, Chipo
Gavi, Samuel
Mangiza, Marcia
Moyo, Faith Vhenekai
Lohman, Matthew C.
Nhemachena, Taazadza
Chipato, Tsungai
author_facet Gwanzura, Chipo
Gavi, Samuel
Mangiza, Marcia
Moyo, Faith Vhenekai
Lohman, Matthew C.
Nhemachena, Taazadza
Chipato, Tsungai
author_sort Gwanzura, Chipo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neonatal health at delivery as measured by apgar scores is an important outcome. This study was done to assess the impact of anesthesia on Apgar 1-minute and 5-minute scores of infants delivered through elective cesarean section in Zimbabwe. METHODS: We carried out a secondary analysis of data from the Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage (ETAPPH) clinical trial in Zimbabwe. Outcomes measured were infant Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, exposure was the administration of either a general (intravenous propofol/ketamine/sodium thiopental) or spinal (hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%) anesthesia for anesthesia during the elective cesarean section procedure. Marginal Structural Logistic Modelling (MSM) using an unstabilized Inverse Probability Treatment Weight (IPTW) estimator was used to assess the relationship between anesthetic administration method and infant Apgar scores. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-one (421) women who had an elective caesarean section in the ETAPPH study had their infants assessed for Apgar scores. Comparing general anesthesia to spinal anesthesia, spinal anesthesia was related to good Apgar scores at 1-minute (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.0, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.5–10.7, sensitivity analysis E-value = 3.41). Spinal anesthetic administration was also related to good Apgar scores at 5 min (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.2, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.6–23.1, sensitivity analysis E-value = 4.42). CONCLUSIONS: When providing anesthesia for patients undergoing elective cesarean section, care should be taken on the method of administration of anesthetic agents. General anesthesia tends to depress Apgar scores at 1 min, although most neonates recover and have better scores at 5 min. Spinal anesthesia should be the first choice whenever possible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The clinical trial from which data of this study was abstracted was registered under clinical trials registration number NCT04733157.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101346122023-04-28 Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section Gwanzura, Chipo Gavi, Samuel Mangiza, Marcia Moyo, Faith Vhenekai Lohman, Matthew C. Nhemachena, Taazadza Chipato, Tsungai BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Neonatal health at delivery as measured by apgar scores is an important outcome. This study was done to assess the impact of anesthesia on Apgar 1-minute and 5-minute scores of infants delivered through elective cesarean section in Zimbabwe. METHODS: We carried out a secondary analysis of data from the Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage (ETAPPH) clinical trial in Zimbabwe. Outcomes measured were infant Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, exposure was the administration of either a general (intravenous propofol/ketamine/sodium thiopental) or spinal (hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%) anesthesia for anesthesia during the elective cesarean section procedure. Marginal Structural Logistic Modelling (MSM) using an unstabilized Inverse Probability Treatment Weight (IPTW) estimator was used to assess the relationship between anesthetic administration method and infant Apgar scores. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-one (421) women who had an elective caesarean section in the ETAPPH study had their infants assessed for Apgar scores. Comparing general anesthesia to spinal anesthesia, spinal anesthesia was related to good Apgar scores at 1-minute (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.0, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.5–10.7, sensitivity analysis E-value = 3.41). Spinal anesthetic administration was also related to good Apgar scores at 5 min (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.2, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.6–23.1, sensitivity analysis E-value = 4.42). CONCLUSIONS: When providing anesthesia for patients undergoing elective cesarean section, care should be taken on the method of administration of anesthetic agents. General anesthesia tends to depress Apgar scores at 1 min, although most neonates recover and have better scores at 5 min. Spinal anesthesia should be the first choice whenever possible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The clinical trial from which data of this study was abstracted was registered under clinical trials registration number NCT04733157. BioMed Central 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10134612/ /pubmed/37106343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02098-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gwanzura, Chipo
Gavi, Samuel
Mangiza, Marcia
Moyo, Faith Vhenekai
Lohman, Matthew C.
Nhemachena, Taazadza
Chipato, Tsungai
Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section
title Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section
title_full Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section
title_fullStr Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section
title_full_unstemmed Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section
title_short Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section
title_sort effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02098-w
work_keys_str_mv AT gwanzurachipo effectofanesthesiaadministrationmethodonapgarscoresofinfantsborntowomenundergoingelectivecesareansection
AT gavisamuel effectofanesthesiaadministrationmethodonapgarscoresofinfantsborntowomenundergoingelectivecesareansection
AT mangizamarcia effectofanesthesiaadministrationmethodonapgarscoresofinfantsborntowomenundergoingelectivecesareansection
AT moyofaithvhenekai effectofanesthesiaadministrationmethodonapgarscoresofinfantsborntowomenundergoingelectivecesareansection
AT lohmanmatthewc effectofanesthesiaadministrationmethodonapgarscoresofinfantsborntowomenundergoingelectivecesareansection
AT nhemachenataazadza effectofanesthesiaadministrationmethodonapgarscoresofinfantsborntowomenundergoingelectivecesareansection
AT chipatotsungai effectofanesthesiaadministrationmethodonapgarscoresofinfantsborntowomenundergoingelectivecesareansection