Cargando…

Comparison of wrist actimetry variables of paretic upper limb use in post stroke patients for ecological monitoring

BACKGROUND: To date, many wrist actimetric variables dedicated to measuring the upper limbs (UL) in post-stroke patients have been developed but very few comparisons have been made between them. The objective of this study was to compare different actimetric variables of the ULs between a stroke and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dusfour, Gilles, Mottet, Denis, Muthalib, Makii, Laffont, Isabelle, Bakhti, Karima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01167-y
_version_ 1785031800711544832
author Dusfour, Gilles
Mottet, Denis
Muthalib, Makii
Laffont, Isabelle
Bakhti, Karima
author_facet Dusfour, Gilles
Mottet, Denis
Muthalib, Makii
Laffont, Isabelle
Bakhti, Karima
author_sort Dusfour, Gilles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, many wrist actimetric variables dedicated to measuring the upper limbs (UL) in post-stroke patients have been developed but very few comparisons have been made between them. The objective of this study was to compare different actimetric variables of the ULs between a stroke and healthy population. METHODS: Accelerometers were worn continuously for a period of 7 days on both wrists of 19 post-stroke hemiparetic patients as well as 11 healthy subjects. Various wrist actimetry variables were calculated, including the Jerk ratio 50 (JR50, cumulative probability that the Jerk Ratio is between 1 and 2), absolute (FuncUse30) and relative (FuncUseRatio30) amounts of functional use of movements of the ULs with angular amplitude greater than 30°, and absolute (UH) and relative (UseHoursRatio) use hours. RESULTS: FuncUse30, FuncUseRatio30, UH, UseHoursRatio and JR50 of the paretic UL of stroke patients were significantly lower than in the non-dominant UL of healthy subjects. Comparing the ratio variables in stroke patients, FuncUseRatio30 was significantly lower than UseHoursRatio and JR50, suggesting a more clinically sensitive variable to monitor. In an exploratory analysis, FuncUseRatio tends to decrease with angular range of motion for stroke patients while it remains stable and close to 1 for healthy subjects. UseHoursRatio, FuncUseRatio30 and JR50 show linear correlation with Fugl-Meyer score (FM), with r(2) equal to 0.53, 0.35 and 0.21, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study determined that the FuncUseRatio30 variable provides the most sensitive clinical biomarker of paretic UL use in post-stroke patients, and that FuncUseHours—angular range of motion relationship allows the identification of the UL behaviour of each patient. This ecological information on the level of functional use of the paretic UL can be used to improve follow-up and develop patient-specific therapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-023-01167-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101346272023-04-28 Comparison of wrist actimetry variables of paretic upper limb use in post stroke patients for ecological monitoring Dusfour, Gilles Mottet, Denis Muthalib, Makii Laffont, Isabelle Bakhti, Karima J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: To date, many wrist actimetric variables dedicated to measuring the upper limbs (UL) in post-stroke patients have been developed but very few comparisons have been made between them. The objective of this study was to compare different actimetric variables of the ULs between a stroke and healthy population. METHODS: Accelerometers were worn continuously for a period of 7 days on both wrists of 19 post-stroke hemiparetic patients as well as 11 healthy subjects. Various wrist actimetry variables were calculated, including the Jerk ratio 50 (JR50, cumulative probability that the Jerk Ratio is between 1 and 2), absolute (FuncUse30) and relative (FuncUseRatio30) amounts of functional use of movements of the ULs with angular amplitude greater than 30°, and absolute (UH) and relative (UseHoursRatio) use hours. RESULTS: FuncUse30, FuncUseRatio30, UH, UseHoursRatio and JR50 of the paretic UL of stroke patients were significantly lower than in the non-dominant UL of healthy subjects. Comparing the ratio variables in stroke patients, FuncUseRatio30 was significantly lower than UseHoursRatio and JR50, suggesting a more clinically sensitive variable to monitor. In an exploratory analysis, FuncUseRatio tends to decrease with angular range of motion for stroke patients while it remains stable and close to 1 for healthy subjects. UseHoursRatio, FuncUseRatio30 and JR50 show linear correlation with Fugl-Meyer score (FM), with r(2) equal to 0.53, 0.35 and 0.21, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study determined that the FuncUseRatio30 variable provides the most sensitive clinical biomarker of paretic UL use in post-stroke patients, and that FuncUseHours—angular range of motion relationship allows the identification of the UL behaviour of each patient. This ecological information on the level of functional use of the paretic UL can be used to improve follow-up and develop patient-specific therapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-023-01167-y. BioMed Central 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10134627/ /pubmed/37106460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01167-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Dusfour, Gilles
Mottet, Denis
Muthalib, Makii
Laffont, Isabelle
Bakhti, Karima
Comparison of wrist actimetry variables of paretic upper limb use in post stroke patients for ecological monitoring
title Comparison of wrist actimetry variables of paretic upper limb use in post stroke patients for ecological monitoring
title_full Comparison of wrist actimetry variables of paretic upper limb use in post stroke patients for ecological monitoring
title_fullStr Comparison of wrist actimetry variables of paretic upper limb use in post stroke patients for ecological monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of wrist actimetry variables of paretic upper limb use in post stroke patients for ecological monitoring
title_short Comparison of wrist actimetry variables of paretic upper limb use in post stroke patients for ecological monitoring
title_sort comparison of wrist actimetry variables of paretic upper limb use in post stroke patients for ecological monitoring
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01167-y
work_keys_str_mv AT dusfourgilles comparisonofwristactimetryvariablesofpareticupperlimbuseinpoststrokepatientsforecologicalmonitoring
AT mottetdenis comparisonofwristactimetryvariablesofpareticupperlimbuseinpoststrokepatientsforecologicalmonitoring
AT muthalibmakii comparisonofwristactimetryvariablesofpareticupperlimbuseinpoststrokepatientsforecologicalmonitoring
AT laffontisabelle comparisonofwristactimetryvariablesofpareticupperlimbuseinpoststrokepatientsforecologicalmonitoring
AT bakhtikarima comparisonofwristactimetryvariablesofpareticupperlimbuseinpoststrokepatientsforecologicalmonitoring