Cargando…
Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Reducing portion sizes of commercially available foods could be an effective public health strategy to reduce population energy intake, but recent research suggests that the effect portion size has on energy intake may differ based on socioeconomic position (SEP). OBJECTIVE: We tested wh...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01453-x |
_version_ | 1785031801681477632 |
---|---|
author | Langfield, Tess Clarke, Katie Marty, Lucile Jones, Andrew Robinson, Eric |
author_facet | Langfield, Tess Clarke, Katie Marty, Lucile Jones, Andrew Robinson, Eric |
author_sort | Langfield, Tess |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reducing portion sizes of commercially available foods could be an effective public health strategy to reduce population energy intake, but recent research suggests that the effect portion size has on energy intake may differ based on socioeconomic position (SEP). OBJECTIVE: We tested whether the effect of reducing food portion sizes on daily energy intake differed based on SEP. METHODS: Participants were served either smaller or larger portions of food at lunch and evening meals (N = 50; Study 1) and breakfast, lunch and evening meals (N = 46; Study 2) in the laboratory on two separate days, in repeated-measures designs. The primary outcome was total daily energy intake (kcal). Participant recruitment was stratified by primary indicators of SEP; highest educational qualification (Study 1) and subjective social status (Study 2), and randomisation to the order portion sizes were served was stratified by SEP. Secondary indicators of SEP in both studies included household income, self-reported childhood financial hardship and a measure accounting for total years in education. RESULTS: In both studies, smaller (vs larger) meal portions led to a reduction in daily energy intake (ps < .02). Smaller portions resulted in a reduction of 235 kcal per day (95% CI: 134, 336) in Study 1 and 143 kcal per day (95% CI: 24, 263) in Study 2. There was no evidence in either study that effects of portion size on energy intake differed by SEP. Results were consistent when examining effects on portion-manipulated meal (as opposed to daily) energy intake. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing meal portion sizes could be an effective way to reduce overall daily energy intake and contrary to other suggestions it may be a socioeconomically equitable approach to improving diet. TRIAL REGISTRATION: These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05173376 and NCT05399836. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-023-01453-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10134633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101346332023-04-28 Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials Langfield, Tess Clarke, Katie Marty, Lucile Jones, Andrew Robinson, Eric Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Reducing portion sizes of commercially available foods could be an effective public health strategy to reduce population energy intake, but recent research suggests that the effect portion size has on energy intake may differ based on socioeconomic position (SEP). OBJECTIVE: We tested whether the effect of reducing food portion sizes on daily energy intake differed based on SEP. METHODS: Participants were served either smaller or larger portions of food at lunch and evening meals (N = 50; Study 1) and breakfast, lunch and evening meals (N = 46; Study 2) in the laboratory on two separate days, in repeated-measures designs. The primary outcome was total daily energy intake (kcal). Participant recruitment was stratified by primary indicators of SEP; highest educational qualification (Study 1) and subjective social status (Study 2), and randomisation to the order portion sizes were served was stratified by SEP. Secondary indicators of SEP in both studies included household income, self-reported childhood financial hardship and a measure accounting for total years in education. RESULTS: In both studies, smaller (vs larger) meal portions led to a reduction in daily energy intake (ps < .02). Smaller portions resulted in a reduction of 235 kcal per day (95% CI: 134, 336) in Study 1 and 143 kcal per day (95% CI: 24, 263) in Study 2. There was no evidence in either study that effects of portion size on energy intake differed by SEP. Results were consistent when examining effects on portion-manipulated meal (as opposed to daily) energy intake. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing meal portion sizes could be an effective way to reduce overall daily energy intake and contrary to other suggestions it may be a socioeconomically equitable approach to improving diet. TRIAL REGISTRATION: These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05173376 and NCT05399836. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-023-01453-x. BioMed Central 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10134633/ /pubmed/37101143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01453-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Langfield, Tess Clarke, Katie Marty, Lucile Jones, Andrew Robinson, Eric Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials |
title | Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01453-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langfieldtess socioeconomicpositionandtheinfluenceoffoodportionsizeondailyenergyintakeinadultfemalestworandomizedcontrolledtrials AT clarkekatie socioeconomicpositionandtheinfluenceoffoodportionsizeondailyenergyintakeinadultfemalestworandomizedcontrolledtrials AT martylucile socioeconomicpositionandtheinfluenceoffoodportionsizeondailyenergyintakeinadultfemalestworandomizedcontrolledtrials AT jonesandrew socioeconomicpositionandtheinfluenceoffoodportionsizeondailyenergyintakeinadultfemalestworandomizedcontrolledtrials AT robinsoneric socioeconomicpositionandtheinfluenceoffoodportionsizeondailyenergyintakeinadultfemalestworandomizedcontrolledtrials |