Cargando…

Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Reducing portion sizes of commercially available foods could be an effective public health strategy to reduce population energy intake, but recent research suggests that the effect portion size has on energy intake may differ based on socioeconomic position (SEP). OBJECTIVE: We tested wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langfield, Tess, Clarke, Katie, Marty, Lucile, Jones, Andrew, Robinson, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01453-x
_version_ 1785031801681477632
author Langfield, Tess
Clarke, Katie
Marty, Lucile
Jones, Andrew
Robinson, Eric
author_facet Langfield, Tess
Clarke, Katie
Marty, Lucile
Jones, Andrew
Robinson, Eric
author_sort Langfield, Tess
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reducing portion sizes of commercially available foods could be an effective public health strategy to reduce population energy intake, but recent research suggests that the effect portion size has on energy intake may differ based on socioeconomic position (SEP). OBJECTIVE: We tested whether the effect of reducing food portion sizes on daily energy intake differed based on SEP. METHODS: Participants were served either smaller or larger portions of food at lunch and evening meals (N = 50; Study 1) and breakfast, lunch and evening meals (N = 46; Study 2) in the laboratory on two separate days, in repeated-measures designs. The primary outcome was total daily energy intake (kcal). Participant recruitment was stratified by primary indicators of SEP; highest educational qualification (Study 1) and subjective social status (Study 2), and randomisation to the order portion sizes were served was stratified by SEP. Secondary indicators of SEP in both studies included household income, self-reported childhood financial hardship and a measure accounting for total years in education. RESULTS: In both studies, smaller (vs larger) meal portions led to a reduction in daily energy intake (ps < .02). Smaller portions resulted in a reduction of 235 kcal per day (95% CI: 134, 336) in Study 1 and 143 kcal per day (95% CI: 24, 263) in Study 2. There was no evidence in either study that effects of portion size on energy intake differed by SEP. Results were consistent when examining effects on portion-manipulated meal (as opposed to daily) energy intake. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing meal portion sizes could be an effective way to reduce overall daily energy intake and contrary to other suggestions it may be a socioeconomically equitable approach to improving diet. TRIAL REGISTRATION: These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05173376 and NCT05399836. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-023-01453-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101346332023-04-28 Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials Langfield, Tess Clarke, Katie Marty, Lucile Jones, Andrew Robinson, Eric Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Reducing portion sizes of commercially available foods could be an effective public health strategy to reduce population energy intake, but recent research suggests that the effect portion size has on energy intake may differ based on socioeconomic position (SEP). OBJECTIVE: We tested whether the effect of reducing food portion sizes on daily energy intake differed based on SEP. METHODS: Participants were served either smaller or larger portions of food at lunch and evening meals (N = 50; Study 1) and breakfast, lunch and evening meals (N = 46; Study 2) in the laboratory on two separate days, in repeated-measures designs. The primary outcome was total daily energy intake (kcal). Participant recruitment was stratified by primary indicators of SEP; highest educational qualification (Study 1) and subjective social status (Study 2), and randomisation to the order portion sizes were served was stratified by SEP. Secondary indicators of SEP in both studies included household income, self-reported childhood financial hardship and a measure accounting for total years in education. RESULTS: In both studies, smaller (vs larger) meal portions led to a reduction in daily energy intake (ps < .02). Smaller portions resulted in a reduction of 235 kcal per day (95% CI: 134, 336) in Study 1 and 143 kcal per day (95% CI: 24, 263) in Study 2. There was no evidence in either study that effects of portion size on energy intake differed by SEP. Results were consistent when examining effects on portion-manipulated meal (as opposed to daily) energy intake. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing meal portion sizes could be an effective way to reduce overall daily energy intake and contrary to other suggestions it may be a socioeconomically equitable approach to improving diet. TRIAL REGISTRATION: These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05173376 and NCT05399836. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-023-01453-x. BioMed Central 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10134633/ /pubmed/37101143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01453-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Langfield, Tess
Clarke, Katie
Marty, Lucile
Jones, Andrew
Robinson, Eric
Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials
title Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials
title_full Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials
title_short Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials
title_sort socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01453-x
work_keys_str_mv AT langfieldtess socioeconomicpositionandtheinfluenceoffoodportionsizeondailyenergyintakeinadultfemalestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT clarkekatie socioeconomicpositionandtheinfluenceoffoodportionsizeondailyenergyintakeinadultfemalestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT martylucile socioeconomicpositionandtheinfluenceoffoodportionsizeondailyenergyintakeinadultfemalestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jonesandrew socioeconomicpositionandtheinfluenceoffoodportionsizeondailyenergyintakeinadultfemalestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT robinsoneric socioeconomicpositionandtheinfluenceoffoodportionsizeondailyenergyintakeinadultfemalestworandomizedcontrolledtrials