Cargando…

Intravenous misuse of slow-release oral morphine capsules: how much morphine is injected?

BACKGROUND: The injection of morphine from morphine sulfate capsules containing sustained-release microbeads (Skenan®) is a practice frequently described by French intravenous opioid users. They seek an injectable form of substitution for heroin. Depending on how the syringe is prepared, the morphin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertin, Célian, Montigne, Edouard, Teixeira, Sarah, Ferrer, Florent, Lauwerie, Louis, Richard, Damien, Authier, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-023-00781-2
_version_ 1785031807338545152
author Bertin, Célian
Montigne, Edouard
Teixeira, Sarah
Ferrer, Florent
Lauwerie, Louis
Richard, Damien
Authier, Nicolas
author_facet Bertin, Célian
Montigne, Edouard
Teixeira, Sarah
Ferrer, Florent
Lauwerie, Louis
Richard, Damien
Authier, Nicolas
author_sort Bertin, Célian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The injection of morphine from morphine sulfate capsules containing sustained-release microbeads (Skenan®) is a practice frequently described by French intravenous opioid users. They seek an injectable form of substitution for heroin. Depending on how the syringe is prepared, the morphine rates may vary. The dosage of the capsule, the temperature of the dissolving water and the type of filter used have been identified as the parameters most likely to influence the final quantity of morphine in solution before intravenous injection. The aim of our study was to determine the amounts of morphine actually injected, according to the different preparation modalities described by people who inject morphine and the harm reduction equipment made available to them. METHODS: Different morphine syringes were prepared by varying the dosage of the capsule (100 or 200 mg), the temperature of the dissolving water before adding morphine, ambient (≈ 22 °C) or heat (≈ 80 °C) and four filtration devices: risk reduction Steribox® cotton, risk reduction filter “Sterifilt®”, “Wheel” filter and cigarette filter. The quantification of the morphine in the syringe body was carried out by liquid phase chromatography coupled with a mass spectrometry detector. RESULTS: The best extraction yields were obtained with heated water, independently of dosages (p < 0.01). Yields of 100 mg capsules varied according to the filter (p < 0.01) and the water temperature (p < 0.01), with maximum yields obtained for solutions dissolved in heated water, then filtered with the “Wheel” filter (83 mg). The yields of the 200 mg capsules varied according to the temperature of the water (p < 0.01), without difference according to the filter used (p > 0.01), and maximum yields obtained for solutions dissolved in heated water (95 mg). CONCLUSIONS: No procedure for dissolving Skenan® led to the complete dissolution of the morphine it contains. Whatever the variations in preparation conditions, the extraction rates of the 200 mg morphine capsules were lower than those of 100 mg, without the risk reduction filters adversely impacting morphine extraction. Offering an injectable substitution to persons who inject morphine would make it possible to reduce the risks and damage, particularly overdoses, associated with variations in dosage due to preparation methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-023-00781-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101346602023-04-28 Intravenous misuse of slow-release oral morphine capsules: how much morphine is injected? Bertin, Célian Montigne, Edouard Teixeira, Sarah Ferrer, Florent Lauwerie, Louis Richard, Damien Authier, Nicolas Harm Reduct J Research BACKGROUND: The injection of morphine from morphine sulfate capsules containing sustained-release microbeads (Skenan®) is a practice frequently described by French intravenous opioid users. They seek an injectable form of substitution for heroin. Depending on how the syringe is prepared, the morphine rates may vary. The dosage of the capsule, the temperature of the dissolving water and the type of filter used have been identified as the parameters most likely to influence the final quantity of morphine in solution before intravenous injection. The aim of our study was to determine the amounts of morphine actually injected, according to the different preparation modalities described by people who inject morphine and the harm reduction equipment made available to them. METHODS: Different morphine syringes were prepared by varying the dosage of the capsule (100 or 200 mg), the temperature of the dissolving water before adding morphine, ambient (≈ 22 °C) or heat (≈ 80 °C) and four filtration devices: risk reduction Steribox® cotton, risk reduction filter “Sterifilt®”, “Wheel” filter and cigarette filter. The quantification of the morphine in the syringe body was carried out by liquid phase chromatography coupled with a mass spectrometry detector. RESULTS: The best extraction yields were obtained with heated water, independently of dosages (p < 0.01). Yields of 100 mg capsules varied according to the filter (p < 0.01) and the water temperature (p < 0.01), with maximum yields obtained for solutions dissolved in heated water, then filtered with the “Wheel” filter (83 mg). The yields of the 200 mg capsules varied according to the temperature of the water (p < 0.01), without difference according to the filter used (p > 0.01), and maximum yields obtained for solutions dissolved in heated water (95 mg). CONCLUSIONS: No procedure for dissolving Skenan® led to the complete dissolution of the morphine it contains. Whatever the variations in preparation conditions, the extraction rates of the 200 mg morphine capsules were lower than those of 100 mg, without the risk reduction filters adversely impacting morphine extraction. Offering an injectable substitution to persons who inject morphine would make it possible to reduce the risks and damage, particularly overdoses, associated with variations in dosage due to preparation methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-023-00781-2. BioMed Central 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10134660/ /pubmed/37106464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-023-00781-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bertin, Célian
Montigne, Edouard
Teixeira, Sarah
Ferrer, Florent
Lauwerie, Louis
Richard, Damien
Authier, Nicolas
Intravenous misuse of slow-release oral morphine capsules: how much morphine is injected?
title Intravenous misuse of slow-release oral morphine capsules: how much morphine is injected?
title_full Intravenous misuse of slow-release oral morphine capsules: how much morphine is injected?
title_fullStr Intravenous misuse of slow-release oral morphine capsules: how much morphine is injected?
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous misuse of slow-release oral morphine capsules: how much morphine is injected?
title_short Intravenous misuse of slow-release oral morphine capsules: how much morphine is injected?
title_sort intravenous misuse of slow-release oral morphine capsules: how much morphine is injected?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-023-00781-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bertincelian intravenousmisuseofslowreleaseoralmorphinecapsuleshowmuchmorphineisinjected
AT montigneedouard intravenousmisuseofslowreleaseoralmorphinecapsuleshowmuchmorphineisinjected
AT teixeirasarah intravenousmisuseofslowreleaseoralmorphinecapsuleshowmuchmorphineisinjected
AT ferrerflorent intravenousmisuseofslowreleaseoralmorphinecapsuleshowmuchmorphineisinjected
AT lauwerielouis intravenousmisuseofslowreleaseoralmorphinecapsuleshowmuchmorphineisinjected
AT richarddamien intravenousmisuseofslowreleaseoralmorphinecapsuleshowmuchmorphineisinjected
AT authiernicolas intravenousmisuseofslowreleaseoralmorphinecapsuleshowmuchmorphineisinjected