Cargando…
Predicting patient-reported outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: development and external validation of multivariable prediction models
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop and externally validate prediction models of spinal surgery outcomes based on a retrospective review of a prospective clinical database, uniquely comparing multivariate regression and random forest (machine learning) approaches, and identifying the most import...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06446-2 |
_version_ | 1785031809790115840 |
---|---|
author | Halicka, Monika Wilby, Martin Duarte, Rui Brown, Christopher |
author_facet | Halicka, Monika Wilby, Martin Duarte, Rui Brown, Christopher |
author_sort | Halicka, Monika |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop and externally validate prediction models of spinal surgery outcomes based on a retrospective review of a prospective clinical database, uniquely comparing multivariate regression and random forest (machine learning) approaches, and identifying the most important predictors. METHODS: Outcomes were change in back and leg pain intensity and Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) from baseline to the last available postoperative follow-up (3–24 months), defined as minimal clinically important change (MCID) and continuous change score. Eligible patients underwent lumbar spine surgery for degenerative pathology between 2011 and 2021. Data were split by surgery date into development (N = 2691) and validation (N = 1616) sets for temporal external validation. Multivariate logistic and linear regression, and random forest classification and regression models, were fit to the development data and validated on the external data. RESULTS: All models demonstrated good calibration in the validation data. Discrimination ability (area under the curve) for MCID ranged from 0.63 (COMI) to 0.72 (back pain) in regression, and from 0.62 (COMI) to 0.68 (back pain) in random forests. The explained variation in continuous change scores spanned 16%-28% in linear, and 15%-25% in random forests regression. The most important predictors included age, baseline scores on the respective outcome measures, type of degenerative pathology, previous spinal surgeries, smoking status, morbidity, and duration of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The developed models appear robust and generalisable across different outcomes and modelling approaches but produced only borderline acceptable discrimination ability, suggesting the need to assess further prognostic factors. External validation showed no advantage of the random forest approach. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06446-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10134672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101346722023-04-28 Predicting patient-reported outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: development and external validation of multivariable prediction models Halicka, Monika Wilby, Martin Duarte, Rui Brown, Christopher BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop and externally validate prediction models of spinal surgery outcomes based on a retrospective review of a prospective clinical database, uniquely comparing multivariate regression and random forest (machine learning) approaches, and identifying the most important predictors. METHODS: Outcomes were change in back and leg pain intensity and Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) from baseline to the last available postoperative follow-up (3–24 months), defined as minimal clinically important change (MCID) and continuous change score. Eligible patients underwent lumbar spine surgery for degenerative pathology between 2011 and 2021. Data were split by surgery date into development (N = 2691) and validation (N = 1616) sets for temporal external validation. Multivariate logistic and linear regression, and random forest classification and regression models, were fit to the development data and validated on the external data. RESULTS: All models demonstrated good calibration in the validation data. Discrimination ability (area under the curve) for MCID ranged from 0.63 (COMI) to 0.72 (back pain) in regression, and from 0.62 (COMI) to 0.68 (back pain) in random forests. The explained variation in continuous change scores spanned 16%-28% in linear, and 15%-25% in random forests regression. The most important predictors included age, baseline scores on the respective outcome measures, type of degenerative pathology, previous spinal surgeries, smoking status, morbidity, and duration of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The developed models appear robust and generalisable across different outcomes and modelling approaches but produced only borderline acceptable discrimination ability, suggesting the need to assess further prognostic factors. External validation showed no advantage of the random forest approach. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06446-2. BioMed Central 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10134672/ /pubmed/37106435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06446-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Halicka, Monika Wilby, Martin Duarte, Rui Brown, Christopher Predicting patient-reported outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: development and external validation of multivariable prediction models |
title | Predicting patient-reported outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: development and external validation of multivariable prediction models |
title_full | Predicting patient-reported outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: development and external validation of multivariable prediction models |
title_fullStr | Predicting patient-reported outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: development and external validation of multivariable prediction models |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting patient-reported outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: development and external validation of multivariable prediction models |
title_short | Predicting patient-reported outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: development and external validation of multivariable prediction models |
title_sort | predicting patient-reported outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: development and external validation of multivariable prediction models |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06446-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halickamonika predictingpatientreportedoutcomesfollowinglumbarspinesurgerydevelopmentandexternalvalidationofmultivariablepredictionmodels AT wilbymartin predictingpatientreportedoutcomesfollowinglumbarspinesurgerydevelopmentandexternalvalidationofmultivariablepredictionmodels AT duarterui predictingpatientreportedoutcomesfollowinglumbarspinesurgerydevelopmentandexternalvalidationofmultivariablepredictionmodels AT brownchristopher predictingpatientreportedoutcomesfollowinglumbarspinesurgerydevelopmentandexternalvalidationofmultivariablepredictionmodels |