Cargando…

The impact of growth at elevated [CO(2)] on stomatal anatomy and behavior differs between wheat species and cultivars

The ability of plants to respond to changes in the environment is crucial to their survival and reproductive success. The impact of increasing the atmospheric CO(2) concentration (a[CO(2)]), mediated by behavioral and developmental responses of stomata, on crop performance remains a concern under al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wall, Shellie, Cockram, James, Vialet-Chabrand, Silvere, Van Rie, Jeroen, Gallé, Alexander, Lawson, Tracy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36633860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erad011
_version_ 1785031847892221952
author Wall, Shellie
Cockram, James
Vialet-Chabrand, Silvere
Van Rie, Jeroen
Gallé, Alexander
Lawson, Tracy
author_facet Wall, Shellie
Cockram, James
Vialet-Chabrand, Silvere
Van Rie, Jeroen
Gallé, Alexander
Lawson, Tracy
author_sort Wall, Shellie
collection PubMed
description The ability of plants to respond to changes in the environment is crucial to their survival and reproductive success. The impact of increasing the atmospheric CO(2) concentration (a[CO(2)]), mediated by behavioral and developmental responses of stomata, on crop performance remains a concern under all climate change scenarios, with potential impacts on future food security. To identify possible beneficial traits that could be exploited for future breeding, phenotypic variation in morphological traits including stomatal size and density, as well as physiological responses and, critically, the effect of growth [CO(2)] on these traits, was assessed in six wheat relative accessions (including Aegilops tauschii, Triticum turgidum ssp. Dicoccoides, and T. turgidum ssp. dicoccon) and five elite bread wheat T. aestivum cultivars. Exploiting a range of different species and ploidy, we identified key differences in photosynthetic capacity between elite hexaploid wheat and wheat relatives. We also report differences in the speed of stomatal responses which were found to be faster in wheat relatives than in elite cultivars, a trait that could be useful for enhanced photosynthetic carbon gain and water use efficiency. Furthermore, these traits do not all appear to be influenced by elevated [CO(2)], and determining the underlying genetics will be critical for future breeding programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101348982023-04-28 The impact of growth at elevated [CO(2)] on stomatal anatomy and behavior differs between wheat species and cultivars Wall, Shellie Cockram, James Vialet-Chabrand, Silvere Van Rie, Jeroen Gallé, Alexander Lawson, Tracy J Exp Bot Research Papers The ability of plants to respond to changes in the environment is crucial to their survival and reproductive success. The impact of increasing the atmospheric CO(2) concentration (a[CO(2)]), mediated by behavioral and developmental responses of stomata, on crop performance remains a concern under all climate change scenarios, with potential impacts on future food security. To identify possible beneficial traits that could be exploited for future breeding, phenotypic variation in morphological traits including stomatal size and density, as well as physiological responses and, critically, the effect of growth [CO(2)] on these traits, was assessed in six wheat relative accessions (including Aegilops tauschii, Triticum turgidum ssp. Dicoccoides, and T. turgidum ssp. dicoccon) and five elite bread wheat T. aestivum cultivars. Exploiting a range of different species and ploidy, we identified key differences in photosynthetic capacity between elite hexaploid wheat and wheat relatives. We also report differences in the speed of stomatal responses which were found to be faster in wheat relatives than in elite cultivars, a trait that could be useful for enhanced photosynthetic carbon gain and water use efficiency. Furthermore, these traits do not all appear to be influenced by elevated [CO(2)], and determining the underlying genetics will be critical for future breeding programmes. Oxford University Press 2023-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10134898/ /pubmed/36633860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erad011 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Wall, Shellie
Cockram, James
Vialet-Chabrand, Silvere
Van Rie, Jeroen
Gallé, Alexander
Lawson, Tracy
The impact of growth at elevated [CO(2)] on stomatal anatomy and behavior differs between wheat species and cultivars
title The impact of growth at elevated [CO(2)] on stomatal anatomy and behavior differs between wheat species and cultivars
title_full The impact of growth at elevated [CO(2)] on stomatal anatomy and behavior differs between wheat species and cultivars
title_fullStr The impact of growth at elevated [CO(2)] on stomatal anatomy and behavior differs between wheat species and cultivars
title_full_unstemmed The impact of growth at elevated [CO(2)] on stomatal anatomy and behavior differs between wheat species and cultivars
title_short The impact of growth at elevated [CO(2)] on stomatal anatomy and behavior differs between wheat species and cultivars
title_sort impact of growth at elevated [co(2)] on stomatal anatomy and behavior differs between wheat species and cultivars
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36633860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erad011
work_keys_str_mv AT wallshellie theimpactofgrowthatelevatedco2onstomatalanatomyandbehaviordiffersbetweenwheatspeciesandcultivars
AT cockramjames theimpactofgrowthatelevatedco2onstomatalanatomyandbehaviordiffersbetweenwheatspeciesandcultivars
AT vialetchabrandsilvere theimpactofgrowthatelevatedco2onstomatalanatomyandbehaviordiffersbetweenwheatspeciesandcultivars
AT vanriejeroen theimpactofgrowthatelevatedco2onstomatalanatomyandbehaviordiffersbetweenwheatspeciesandcultivars
AT gallealexander theimpactofgrowthatelevatedco2onstomatalanatomyandbehaviordiffersbetweenwheatspeciesandcultivars
AT lawsontracy theimpactofgrowthatelevatedco2onstomatalanatomyandbehaviordiffersbetweenwheatspeciesandcultivars
AT wallshellie impactofgrowthatelevatedco2onstomatalanatomyandbehaviordiffersbetweenwheatspeciesandcultivars
AT cockramjames impactofgrowthatelevatedco2onstomatalanatomyandbehaviordiffersbetweenwheatspeciesandcultivars
AT vialetchabrandsilvere impactofgrowthatelevatedco2onstomatalanatomyandbehaviordiffersbetweenwheatspeciesandcultivars
AT vanriejeroen impactofgrowthatelevatedco2onstomatalanatomyandbehaviordiffersbetweenwheatspeciesandcultivars
AT gallealexander impactofgrowthatelevatedco2onstomatalanatomyandbehaviordiffersbetweenwheatspeciesandcultivars
AT lawsontracy impactofgrowthatelevatedco2onstomatalanatomyandbehaviordiffersbetweenwheatspeciesandcultivars