Cargando…

The Prophylactic Effect of Single vs. Dual Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement against Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of the German Arthroplasty Registry

Background: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement in arthroplasties is currently experiencing increased usage. Therefore, single and double antibiotic-loaded bone cements are commercially available and used in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this investigation was to compare the clinical use of single compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szymski, Dominik, Walter, Nike, Krull, Paula, Melsheimer, Oliver, Lang, Siegmund, Grimberg, Alexander, Alt, Volker, Steinbrück, Arnd, Rupp, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10135143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37107094
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12040732
_version_ 1785031906508668928
author Szymski, Dominik
Walter, Nike
Krull, Paula
Melsheimer, Oliver
Lang, Siegmund
Grimberg, Alexander
Alt, Volker
Steinbrück, Arnd
Rupp, Markus
author_facet Szymski, Dominik
Walter, Nike
Krull, Paula
Melsheimer, Oliver
Lang, Siegmund
Grimberg, Alexander
Alt, Volker
Steinbrück, Arnd
Rupp, Markus
author_sort Szymski, Dominik
collection PubMed
description Background: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement in arthroplasties is currently experiencing increased usage. Therefore, single and double antibiotic-loaded bone cements are commercially available and used in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this investigation was to compare the clinical use of single compared to dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement for implant fixation after femoral neck fracture. Further infection rates were to be compared in (partial) arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fracture for both treatment options. Methods: On the basis of the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD), all cases of femoral neck fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty (HA), or total hip arthroplasty (THA) with single and dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement, were included into the data analysis. The infection risk was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: In total, 26,845 cases (HA 76.3%–THA: 23.7%) with femoral neck fracture were included. Within recent years, an increasing usage of dual antibiotic-loaded cement in Germany, with a current proportion of 7.30% in arthroplasty procedures for femoral neck fracture treatment, has been observed. In patients treated with HA, the proportion of dual antibiotic-loaded cement was 7.86%, while in those treated with THA, 5.46% of all prostheses were fixated with a two antibiotic component cement. For all arthroplasty procedures using single antibiotic-loaded bone cement after six months 1.8%, after one year 1.9%, and after five years 2.3%, of the cases failed due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), while in the same time period, in cases with dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement 1.5%, 1.5% and 1.5% suffered from infection (p = 0.34). A infection rate of 1.1% after HA with dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement was reported, compared to a 2.1% infection rate whilst using single antibiotic-loaded bone cement after five years (p = 0.098). The number required for treatment when using HA was 91. Conclusions: The use of dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement is increasingly used in arthroplasty procedures after femoral neck fractures. It demonstrates a reduction of PJI after HA and seems, therefore, to be a useful method for the prevention of infection, especially in patients with increased risk factors for PJI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10135143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101351432023-04-28 The Prophylactic Effect of Single vs. Dual Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement against Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of the German Arthroplasty Registry Szymski, Dominik Walter, Nike Krull, Paula Melsheimer, Oliver Lang, Siegmund Grimberg, Alexander Alt, Volker Steinbrück, Arnd Rupp, Markus Antibiotics (Basel) Article Background: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement in arthroplasties is currently experiencing increased usage. Therefore, single and double antibiotic-loaded bone cements are commercially available and used in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this investigation was to compare the clinical use of single compared to dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement for implant fixation after femoral neck fracture. Further infection rates were to be compared in (partial) arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fracture for both treatment options. Methods: On the basis of the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD), all cases of femoral neck fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty (HA), or total hip arthroplasty (THA) with single and dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement, were included into the data analysis. The infection risk was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: In total, 26,845 cases (HA 76.3%–THA: 23.7%) with femoral neck fracture were included. Within recent years, an increasing usage of dual antibiotic-loaded cement in Germany, with a current proportion of 7.30% in arthroplasty procedures for femoral neck fracture treatment, has been observed. In patients treated with HA, the proportion of dual antibiotic-loaded cement was 7.86%, while in those treated with THA, 5.46% of all prostheses were fixated with a two antibiotic component cement. For all arthroplasty procedures using single antibiotic-loaded bone cement after six months 1.8%, after one year 1.9%, and after five years 2.3%, of the cases failed due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), while in the same time period, in cases with dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement 1.5%, 1.5% and 1.5% suffered from infection (p = 0.34). A infection rate of 1.1% after HA with dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement was reported, compared to a 2.1% infection rate whilst using single antibiotic-loaded bone cement after five years (p = 0.098). The number required for treatment when using HA was 91. Conclusions: The use of dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement is increasingly used in arthroplasty procedures after femoral neck fractures. It demonstrates a reduction of PJI after HA and seems, therefore, to be a useful method for the prevention of infection, especially in patients with increased risk factors for PJI. MDPI 2023-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10135143/ /pubmed/37107094 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12040732 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Szymski, Dominik
Walter, Nike
Krull, Paula
Melsheimer, Oliver
Lang, Siegmund
Grimberg, Alexander
Alt, Volker
Steinbrück, Arnd
Rupp, Markus
The Prophylactic Effect of Single vs. Dual Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement against Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of the German Arthroplasty Registry
title The Prophylactic Effect of Single vs. Dual Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement against Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of the German Arthroplasty Registry
title_full The Prophylactic Effect of Single vs. Dual Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement against Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of the German Arthroplasty Registry
title_fullStr The Prophylactic Effect of Single vs. Dual Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement against Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of the German Arthroplasty Registry
title_full_unstemmed The Prophylactic Effect of Single vs. Dual Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement against Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of the German Arthroplasty Registry
title_short The Prophylactic Effect of Single vs. Dual Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement against Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of the German Arthroplasty Registry
title_sort prophylactic effect of single vs. dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement against periprosthetic joint infection following hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: an analysis of the german arthroplasty registry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10135143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37107094
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12040732
work_keys_str_mv AT szymskidominik theprophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT walternike theprophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT krullpaula theprophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT melsheimeroliver theprophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT langsiegmund theprophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT grimbergalexander theprophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT altvolker theprophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT steinbruckarnd theprophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT ruppmarkus theprophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT szymskidominik prophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT walternike prophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT krullpaula prophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT melsheimeroliver prophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT langsiegmund prophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT grimbergalexander prophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT altvolker prophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT steinbruckarnd prophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry
AT ruppmarkus prophylacticeffectofsinglevsdualantibioticloadedbonecementagainstperiprostheticjointinfectionfollowinghiparthroplastyforfemoralneckfractureananalysisofthegermanarthroplastyregistry