Cargando…
Comparison of Five Different Selective Agar for the Detection of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium
Five commercially available selective agar were evaluated regarding sensitivity and specificity to detect vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (E.) faecium. Altogether 187 E. faecium strains were included, comprising 119 van-carrying strains (phenotypically vancomycin-resistant n = 105; phenotypically...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10135216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37107028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12040666 |
_version_ | 1785031924197097472 |
---|---|
author | Boschert, Alessa L. Arndt, Franca Hamprecht, Axel Wolke, Martina Walker, Sarah V. |
author_facet | Boschert, Alessa L. Arndt, Franca Hamprecht, Axel Wolke, Martina Walker, Sarah V. |
author_sort | Boschert, Alessa L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Five commercially available selective agar were evaluated regarding sensitivity and specificity to detect vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (E.) faecium. Altogether 187 E. faecium strains were included, comprising 119 van-carrying strains (phenotypically vancomycin-resistant n = 105; phenotypically vancomycin-susceptible VVE-B n = 14) and 68 vancomycin-susceptible isolates. Limit of detection was calculated for each selective agar for pure cultures, stool suspensions and artificial rectal swabs. After 24-h incubation sensitivity ranged between 91.6% and 95.0%. It increased in 2 out of 5 agar after 48-h incubation. Specificity ranged between 94.1% and 100% and was highest after 24 h in 4 out of the 5 agar. Sensitivity of van-carrying phenotypically vancomycin-resistant strains was higher after 24 h (97.1–100%) and 48 h (99.1–100%) when compared to van-carrying strains that tested vancomycin-susceptible (50.0–57.1% after both incubation periods). Overall, chromID VRE, CHROMagar VRE and Brilliance VRE demonstrated the highest detection rates after 24 h. Detection rates of Chromatic VRE and VRESelect improved after 48 h. Adjustment of incubation time depending on the applied media may be advised. As detection of VVE-B was impeded with all selective agar, screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococci relying solely on selective media would not be recommended for critical clinical samples, but rather in combination with molecular methods to improve detection of these strains. Furthermore, stool samples were demonstrated to be superior to rectal swabs and should be favoured, if possible, in screening strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10135216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101352162023-04-28 Comparison of Five Different Selective Agar for the Detection of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Boschert, Alessa L. Arndt, Franca Hamprecht, Axel Wolke, Martina Walker, Sarah V. Antibiotics (Basel) Article Five commercially available selective agar were evaluated regarding sensitivity and specificity to detect vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (E.) faecium. Altogether 187 E. faecium strains were included, comprising 119 van-carrying strains (phenotypically vancomycin-resistant n = 105; phenotypically vancomycin-susceptible VVE-B n = 14) and 68 vancomycin-susceptible isolates. Limit of detection was calculated for each selective agar for pure cultures, stool suspensions and artificial rectal swabs. After 24-h incubation sensitivity ranged between 91.6% and 95.0%. It increased in 2 out of 5 agar after 48-h incubation. Specificity ranged between 94.1% and 100% and was highest after 24 h in 4 out of the 5 agar. Sensitivity of van-carrying phenotypically vancomycin-resistant strains was higher after 24 h (97.1–100%) and 48 h (99.1–100%) when compared to van-carrying strains that tested vancomycin-susceptible (50.0–57.1% after both incubation periods). Overall, chromID VRE, CHROMagar VRE and Brilliance VRE demonstrated the highest detection rates after 24 h. Detection rates of Chromatic VRE and VRESelect improved after 48 h. Adjustment of incubation time depending on the applied media may be advised. As detection of VVE-B was impeded with all selective agar, screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococci relying solely on selective media would not be recommended for critical clinical samples, but rather in combination with molecular methods to improve detection of these strains. Furthermore, stool samples were demonstrated to be superior to rectal swabs and should be favoured, if possible, in screening strategies. MDPI 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10135216/ /pubmed/37107028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12040666 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Boschert, Alessa L. Arndt, Franca Hamprecht, Axel Wolke, Martina Walker, Sarah V. Comparison of Five Different Selective Agar for the Detection of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium |
title | Comparison of Five Different Selective Agar for the Detection of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium |
title_full | Comparison of Five Different Selective Agar for the Detection of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Five Different Selective Agar for the Detection of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Five Different Selective Agar for the Detection of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium |
title_short | Comparison of Five Different Selective Agar for the Detection of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium |
title_sort | comparison of five different selective agar for the detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus faecium |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10135216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37107028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12040666 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boschertalessal comparisonoffivedifferentselectiveagarforthedetectionofvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaecium AT arndtfranca comparisonoffivedifferentselectiveagarforthedetectionofvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaecium AT hamprechtaxel comparisonoffivedifferentselectiveagarforthedetectionofvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaecium AT wolkemartina comparisonoffivedifferentselectiveagarforthedetectionofvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaecium AT walkersarahv comparisonoffivedifferentselectiveagarforthedetectionofvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaecium |