Cargando…

The Antibacterial and Antifungal Capacity of Eight Commercially Available Types of Mouthwash against Oral Microorganisms: An In Vitro Study

This work aimed to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial actions and effects over time of eight types of mouthwash, based on the impact of chlorhexidine on the main microorganisms that are responsible for oral diseases: Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans. The mouthw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Lodovico, Silvia, Dotta, Tatiane Cristina, Cellini, Luigina, Iezzi, Giovanna, D’Ercole, Simonetta, Petrini, Morena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10135288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37107037
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12040675
_version_ 1785031941758648320
author Di Lodovico, Silvia
Dotta, Tatiane Cristina
Cellini, Luigina
Iezzi, Giovanna
D’Ercole, Simonetta
Petrini, Morena
author_facet Di Lodovico, Silvia
Dotta, Tatiane Cristina
Cellini, Luigina
Iezzi, Giovanna
D’Ercole, Simonetta
Petrini, Morena
author_sort Di Lodovico, Silvia
collection PubMed
description This work aimed to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial actions and effects over time of eight types of mouthwash, based on the impact of chlorhexidine on the main microorganisms that are responsible for oral diseases: Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans. The mouthwashes’ antimicrobial action was determined in terms of their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal/fungicidal concentration (MBC/MFC), and time-kill curves at different contact times (10 s, 30 s, 60 s, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, and 60 min), against selected oral microorganisms. All the mouthwashes showed a notable effect against C. albicans (MICs ranging from 0.02% to 0.09%), and higher MIC values were recorded with P. aeruginosa (1.56% to >50%). In general, the mouthwashes showed similar antimicrobial effects at reduced contact times (10, 30, and 60 s) against all the tested microorganisms, except with P. aeruginosa, for which the most significant effect was observed with a long time (15, 30, and 60 min). The results demonstrate significant differences in the antimicrobial actions of the tested mouthwashes, although all contained chlorhexidine and most of them also contained cetylpyridinium chloride. The relevant antimicrobial effects of all the tested mouthwashes, and those with the best higher antimicrobial action, were recorded by A—GUM(®) PAROEX(®)A and B—GUM(®) PAROEX(®), considering their effects against the resistant microorganisms and their MIC values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10135288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101352882023-04-28 The Antibacterial and Antifungal Capacity of Eight Commercially Available Types of Mouthwash against Oral Microorganisms: An In Vitro Study Di Lodovico, Silvia Dotta, Tatiane Cristina Cellini, Luigina Iezzi, Giovanna D’Ercole, Simonetta Petrini, Morena Antibiotics (Basel) Article This work aimed to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial actions and effects over time of eight types of mouthwash, based on the impact of chlorhexidine on the main microorganisms that are responsible for oral diseases: Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans. The mouthwashes’ antimicrobial action was determined in terms of their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal/fungicidal concentration (MBC/MFC), and time-kill curves at different contact times (10 s, 30 s, 60 s, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, and 60 min), against selected oral microorganisms. All the mouthwashes showed a notable effect against C. albicans (MICs ranging from 0.02% to 0.09%), and higher MIC values were recorded with P. aeruginosa (1.56% to >50%). In general, the mouthwashes showed similar antimicrobial effects at reduced contact times (10, 30, and 60 s) against all the tested microorganisms, except with P. aeruginosa, for which the most significant effect was observed with a long time (15, 30, and 60 min). The results demonstrate significant differences in the antimicrobial actions of the tested mouthwashes, although all contained chlorhexidine and most of them also contained cetylpyridinium chloride. The relevant antimicrobial effects of all the tested mouthwashes, and those with the best higher antimicrobial action, were recorded by A—GUM(®) PAROEX(®)A and B—GUM(®) PAROEX(®), considering their effects against the resistant microorganisms and their MIC values. MDPI 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10135288/ /pubmed/37107037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12040675 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Di Lodovico, Silvia
Dotta, Tatiane Cristina
Cellini, Luigina
Iezzi, Giovanna
D’Ercole, Simonetta
Petrini, Morena
The Antibacterial and Antifungal Capacity of Eight Commercially Available Types of Mouthwash against Oral Microorganisms: An In Vitro Study
title The Antibacterial and Antifungal Capacity of Eight Commercially Available Types of Mouthwash against Oral Microorganisms: An In Vitro Study
title_full The Antibacterial and Antifungal Capacity of Eight Commercially Available Types of Mouthwash against Oral Microorganisms: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr The Antibacterial and Antifungal Capacity of Eight Commercially Available Types of Mouthwash against Oral Microorganisms: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed The Antibacterial and Antifungal Capacity of Eight Commercially Available Types of Mouthwash against Oral Microorganisms: An In Vitro Study
title_short The Antibacterial and Antifungal Capacity of Eight Commercially Available Types of Mouthwash against Oral Microorganisms: An In Vitro Study
title_sort antibacterial and antifungal capacity of eight commercially available types of mouthwash against oral microorganisms: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10135288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37107037
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12040675
work_keys_str_mv AT dilodovicosilvia theantibacterialandantifungalcapacityofeightcommerciallyavailabletypesofmouthwashagainstoralmicroorganismsaninvitrostudy
AT dottatatianecristina theantibacterialandantifungalcapacityofeightcommerciallyavailabletypesofmouthwashagainstoralmicroorganismsaninvitrostudy
AT celliniluigina theantibacterialandantifungalcapacityofeightcommerciallyavailabletypesofmouthwashagainstoralmicroorganismsaninvitrostudy
AT iezzigiovanna theantibacterialandantifungalcapacityofeightcommerciallyavailabletypesofmouthwashagainstoralmicroorganismsaninvitrostudy
AT dercolesimonetta theantibacterialandantifungalcapacityofeightcommerciallyavailabletypesofmouthwashagainstoralmicroorganismsaninvitrostudy
AT petrinimorena theantibacterialandantifungalcapacityofeightcommerciallyavailabletypesofmouthwashagainstoralmicroorganismsaninvitrostudy
AT dilodovicosilvia antibacterialandantifungalcapacityofeightcommerciallyavailabletypesofmouthwashagainstoralmicroorganismsaninvitrostudy
AT dottatatianecristina antibacterialandantifungalcapacityofeightcommerciallyavailabletypesofmouthwashagainstoralmicroorganismsaninvitrostudy
AT celliniluigina antibacterialandantifungalcapacityofeightcommerciallyavailabletypesofmouthwashagainstoralmicroorganismsaninvitrostudy
AT iezzigiovanna antibacterialandantifungalcapacityofeightcommerciallyavailabletypesofmouthwashagainstoralmicroorganismsaninvitrostudy
AT dercolesimonetta antibacterialandantifungalcapacityofeightcommerciallyavailabletypesofmouthwashagainstoralmicroorganismsaninvitrostudy
AT petrinimorena antibacterialandantifungalcapacityofeightcommerciallyavailabletypesofmouthwashagainstoralmicroorganismsaninvitrostudy