Cargando…
3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation
Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC) are capable of progenitor cell fraction renewal or tissue-specific differentiation. These properties are maintained during in vitro cultivation, making them an interesting model system for testing biological and pharmacological compounds. Cell cultivation in 2D i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10135665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37189667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041049 |
_version_ | 1785032031813500928 |
---|---|
author | Wolff, Anne Frank, Marcus Staehlke, Susanne Springer, Armin Hahn, Olga Meyer, Juliane Peters, Kirsten |
author_facet | Wolff, Anne Frank, Marcus Staehlke, Susanne Springer, Armin Hahn, Olga Meyer, Juliane Peters, Kirsten |
author_sort | Wolff, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC) are capable of progenitor cell fraction renewal or tissue-specific differentiation. These properties are maintained during in vitro cultivation, making them an interesting model system for testing biological and pharmacological compounds. Cell cultivation in 2D is commonly used to study cellular responses, but the 2D environment does not reflect the structural situation of most cell types. Therefore, 3D culture systems have been developed to provide a more accurate physiological environment in terms of cell–cell interactions. Since knowledge about the effects of 3D culture on specific differentiation processes is limited, we studied the effects on osteogenic differentiation and the release of factors affecting bone metabolism for up to 35 days and compared them with the effects in 2D culture. We demonstrated that the selected 3D model allowed the rapid and reliable formation of spheroids that were stable over several weeks and both accelerated and enhanced osteogenic differentiation compared with the 2D culture. Thus, our experiments provide new insights into the effects of cell arrangement of MSC in 2D and 3D. However, due to the different culture dimensions, various detection methods had to be chosen, which in principle limits the explanatory power of the comparison between 2D and 3D cultures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10135665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101356652023-04-28 3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation Wolff, Anne Frank, Marcus Staehlke, Susanne Springer, Armin Hahn, Olga Meyer, Juliane Peters, Kirsten Biomedicines Article Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC) are capable of progenitor cell fraction renewal or tissue-specific differentiation. These properties are maintained during in vitro cultivation, making them an interesting model system for testing biological and pharmacological compounds. Cell cultivation in 2D is commonly used to study cellular responses, but the 2D environment does not reflect the structural situation of most cell types. Therefore, 3D culture systems have been developed to provide a more accurate physiological environment in terms of cell–cell interactions. Since knowledge about the effects of 3D culture on specific differentiation processes is limited, we studied the effects on osteogenic differentiation and the release of factors affecting bone metabolism for up to 35 days and compared them with the effects in 2D culture. We demonstrated that the selected 3D model allowed the rapid and reliable formation of spheroids that were stable over several weeks and both accelerated and enhanced osteogenic differentiation compared with the 2D culture. Thus, our experiments provide new insights into the effects of cell arrangement of MSC in 2D and 3D. However, due to the different culture dimensions, various detection methods had to be chosen, which in principle limits the explanatory power of the comparison between 2D and 3D cultures. MDPI 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10135665/ /pubmed/37189667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041049 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wolff, Anne Frank, Marcus Staehlke, Susanne Springer, Armin Hahn, Olga Meyer, Juliane Peters, Kirsten 3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation |
title | 3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation |
title_full | 3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation |
title_fullStr | 3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation |
title_full_unstemmed | 3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation |
title_short | 3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation |
title_sort | 3d spheroid cultivation alters the extent and progression of osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells compared to 2d cultivation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10135665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37189667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolffanne 3dspheroidcultivationalterstheextentandprogressionofosteogenicdifferentiationofmesenchymalstemstromalcellscomparedto2dcultivation AT frankmarcus 3dspheroidcultivationalterstheextentandprogressionofosteogenicdifferentiationofmesenchymalstemstromalcellscomparedto2dcultivation AT staehlkesusanne 3dspheroidcultivationalterstheextentandprogressionofosteogenicdifferentiationofmesenchymalstemstromalcellscomparedto2dcultivation AT springerarmin 3dspheroidcultivationalterstheextentandprogressionofosteogenicdifferentiationofmesenchymalstemstromalcellscomparedto2dcultivation AT hahnolga 3dspheroidcultivationalterstheextentandprogressionofosteogenicdifferentiationofmesenchymalstemstromalcellscomparedto2dcultivation AT meyerjuliane 3dspheroidcultivationalterstheextentandprogressionofosteogenicdifferentiationofmesenchymalstemstromalcellscomparedto2dcultivation AT peterskirsten 3dspheroidcultivationalterstheextentandprogressionofosteogenicdifferentiationofmesenchymalstemstromalcellscomparedto2dcultivation |