Cargando…

3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC) are capable of progenitor cell fraction renewal or tissue-specific differentiation. These properties are maintained during in vitro cultivation, making them an interesting model system for testing biological and pharmacological compounds. Cell cultivation in 2D i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolff, Anne, Frank, Marcus, Staehlke, Susanne, Springer, Armin, Hahn, Olga, Meyer, Juliane, Peters, Kirsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10135665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37189667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041049
_version_ 1785032031813500928
author Wolff, Anne
Frank, Marcus
Staehlke, Susanne
Springer, Armin
Hahn, Olga
Meyer, Juliane
Peters, Kirsten
author_facet Wolff, Anne
Frank, Marcus
Staehlke, Susanne
Springer, Armin
Hahn, Olga
Meyer, Juliane
Peters, Kirsten
author_sort Wolff, Anne
collection PubMed
description Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC) are capable of progenitor cell fraction renewal or tissue-specific differentiation. These properties are maintained during in vitro cultivation, making them an interesting model system for testing biological and pharmacological compounds. Cell cultivation in 2D is commonly used to study cellular responses, but the 2D environment does not reflect the structural situation of most cell types. Therefore, 3D culture systems have been developed to provide a more accurate physiological environment in terms of cell–cell interactions. Since knowledge about the effects of 3D culture on specific differentiation processes is limited, we studied the effects on osteogenic differentiation and the release of factors affecting bone metabolism for up to 35 days and compared them with the effects in 2D culture. We demonstrated that the selected 3D model allowed the rapid and reliable formation of spheroids that were stable over several weeks and both accelerated and enhanced osteogenic differentiation compared with the 2D culture. Thus, our experiments provide new insights into the effects of cell arrangement of MSC in 2D and 3D. However, due to the different culture dimensions, various detection methods had to be chosen, which in principle limits the explanatory power of the comparison between 2D and 3D cultures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10135665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101356652023-04-28 3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation Wolff, Anne Frank, Marcus Staehlke, Susanne Springer, Armin Hahn, Olga Meyer, Juliane Peters, Kirsten Biomedicines Article Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC) are capable of progenitor cell fraction renewal or tissue-specific differentiation. These properties are maintained during in vitro cultivation, making them an interesting model system for testing biological and pharmacological compounds. Cell cultivation in 2D is commonly used to study cellular responses, but the 2D environment does not reflect the structural situation of most cell types. Therefore, 3D culture systems have been developed to provide a more accurate physiological environment in terms of cell–cell interactions. Since knowledge about the effects of 3D culture on specific differentiation processes is limited, we studied the effects on osteogenic differentiation and the release of factors affecting bone metabolism for up to 35 days and compared them with the effects in 2D culture. We demonstrated that the selected 3D model allowed the rapid and reliable formation of spheroids that were stable over several weeks and both accelerated and enhanced osteogenic differentiation compared with the 2D culture. Thus, our experiments provide new insights into the effects of cell arrangement of MSC in 2D and 3D. However, due to the different culture dimensions, various detection methods had to be chosen, which in principle limits the explanatory power of the comparison between 2D and 3D cultures. MDPI 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10135665/ /pubmed/37189667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041049 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wolff, Anne
Frank, Marcus
Staehlke, Susanne
Springer, Armin
Hahn, Olga
Meyer, Juliane
Peters, Kirsten
3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation
title 3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation
title_full 3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation
title_fullStr 3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation
title_full_unstemmed 3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation
title_short 3D Spheroid Cultivation Alters the Extent and Progression of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Compared to 2D Cultivation
title_sort 3d spheroid cultivation alters the extent and progression of osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells compared to 2d cultivation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10135665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37189667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041049
work_keys_str_mv AT wolffanne 3dspheroidcultivationalterstheextentandprogressionofosteogenicdifferentiationofmesenchymalstemstromalcellscomparedto2dcultivation
AT frankmarcus 3dspheroidcultivationalterstheextentandprogressionofosteogenicdifferentiationofmesenchymalstemstromalcellscomparedto2dcultivation
AT staehlkesusanne 3dspheroidcultivationalterstheextentandprogressionofosteogenicdifferentiationofmesenchymalstemstromalcellscomparedto2dcultivation
AT springerarmin 3dspheroidcultivationalterstheextentandprogressionofosteogenicdifferentiationofmesenchymalstemstromalcellscomparedto2dcultivation
AT hahnolga 3dspheroidcultivationalterstheextentandprogressionofosteogenicdifferentiationofmesenchymalstemstromalcellscomparedto2dcultivation
AT meyerjuliane 3dspheroidcultivationalterstheextentandprogressionofosteogenicdifferentiationofmesenchymalstemstromalcellscomparedto2dcultivation
AT peterskirsten 3dspheroidcultivationalterstheextentandprogressionofosteogenicdifferentiationofmesenchymalstemstromalcellscomparedto2dcultivation