Cargando…

Value Propositions of Public Adult Hearing Rehabilitation in Denmark

Objective: To obtain and evaluate detailed descriptions of potential value propositions as seen by adults undergoing hearing rehabilitation with hearing aids. Design: Semi-structured interviews with patients and audiologists, a literature search, and the inclusion of domain knowledge from experts an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lund, Katja, Ordoñez, Rodrigo, Nielsen, Jens Bo, Christiansen, Stine, Houmøller, Sabina Storbjerg, Schmidt, Jesper Hvass, Gaihede, Michael, Hammershøi, Dorte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10135904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37102773
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13020023
_version_ 1785032091947237376
author Lund, Katja
Ordoñez, Rodrigo
Nielsen, Jens Bo
Christiansen, Stine
Houmøller, Sabina Storbjerg
Schmidt, Jesper Hvass
Gaihede, Michael
Hammershøi, Dorte
author_facet Lund, Katja
Ordoñez, Rodrigo
Nielsen, Jens Bo
Christiansen, Stine
Houmøller, Sabina Storbjerg
Schmidt, Jesper Hvass
Gaihede, Michael
Hammershøi, Dorte
author_sort Lund, Katja
collection PubMed
description Objective: To obtain and evaluate detailed descriptions of potential value propositions as seen by adults undergoing hearing rehabilitation with hearing aids. Design: Semi-structured interviews with patients and audiologists, a literature search, and the inclusion of domain knowledge from experts and scientists were used to derive value propositions. A two-alternative forced-choice paradigm and probabilistic choice models were used to investigate hearing aid users’ preferences for the value propositions through an online platform. Study sample: Twelve hearing aid users (mean age 70, range 59–70) and eleven clinicians were interviewed. A total of 173 experienced hearing aid users evaluated the value propositions. Results: Twenty-nine value propositions as described by patients, clinicians, and hearing care experts where identified, from which twenty-one value propositions were evaluated. Results of the pair-wise evaluation method show that the value propositions judged to be the most important for the hearing aid users were: “13. To solve the hearing problem you have”, “09. Thorough diagnosis of the hearing”, and “16. The hearing aid solution is adapted to individual needs”, which are related to finding the correct hearing solution and to be considered in the process. The value propositions judged to be least important were: “04 Next of kin and others involved in the process”, “26. To be in the same room as the practitioner”, and “29. The practitioner’s human characteristics”, related to the involvement of others in the process and the proximity and personal manner of the practitioners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10135904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101359042023-04-28 Value Propositions of Public Adult Hearing Rehabilitation in Denmark Lund, Katja Ordoñez, Rodrigo Nielsen, Jens Bo Christiansen, Stine Houmøller, Sabina Storbjerg Schmidt, Jesper Hvass Gaihede, Michael Hammershøi, Dorte Audiol Res Article Objective: To obtain and evaluate detailed descriptions of potential value propositions as seen by adults undergoing hearing rehabilitation with hearing aids. Design: Semi-structured interviews with patients and audiologists, a literature search, and the inclusion of domain knowledge from experts and scientists were used to derive value propositions. A two-alternative forced-choice paradigm and probabilistic choice models were used to investigate hearing aid users’ preferences for the value propositions through an online platform. Study sample: Twelve hearing aid users (mean age 70, range 59–70) and eleven clinicians were interviewed. A total of 173 experienced hearing aid users evaluated the value propositions. Results: Twenty-nine value propositions as described by patients, clinicians, and hearing care experts where identified, from which twenty-one value propositions were evaluated. Results of the pair-wise evaluation method show that the value propositions judged to be the most important for the hearing aid users were: “13. To solve the hearing problem you have”, “09. Thorough diagnosis of the hearing”, and “16. The hearing aid solution is adapted to individual needs”, which are related to finding the correct hearing solution and to be considered in the process. The value propositions judged to be least important were: “04 Next of kin and others involved in the process”, “26. To be in the same room as the practitioner”, and “29. The practitioner’s human characteristics”, related to the involvement of others in the process and the proximity and personal manner of the practitioners. MDPI 2023-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10135904/ /pubmed/37102773 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13020023 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lund, Katja
Ordoñez, Rodrigo
Nielsen, Jens Bo
Christiansen, Stine
Houmøller, Sabina Storbjerg
Schmidt, Jesper Hvass
Gaihede, Michael
Hammershøi, Dorte
Value Propositions of Public Adult Hearing Rehabilitation in Denmark
title Value Propositions of Public Adult Hearing Rehabilitation in Denmark
title_full Value Propositions of Public Adult Hearing Rehabilitation in Denmark
title_fullStr Value Propositions of Public Adult Hearing Rehabilitation in Denmark
title_full_unstemmed Value Propositions of Public Adult Hearing Rehabilitation in Denmark
title_short Value Propositions of Public Adult Hearing Rehabilitation in Denmark
title_sort value propositions of public adult hearing rehabilitation in denmark
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10135904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37102773
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13020023
work_keys_str_mv AT lundkatja valuepropositionsofpublicadulthearingrehabilitationindenmark
AT ordonezrodrigo valuepropositionsofpublicadulthearingrehabilitationindenmark
AT nielsenjensbo valuepropositionsofpublicadulthearingrehabilitationindenmark
AT christiansenstine valuepropositionsofpublicadulthearingrehabilitationindenmark
AT houmøllersabinastorbjerg valuepropositionsofpublicadulthearingrehabilitationindenmark
AT schmidtjesperhvass valuepropositionsofpublicadulthearingrehabilitationindenmark
AT gaihedemichael valuepropositionsofpublicadulthearingrehabilitationindenmark
AT hammershøidorte valuepropositionsofpublicadulthearingrehabilitationindenmark