Cargando…
Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Plastic and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: A Scoping Review
Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) have evolved since their introduction to medicine in the 1990s. More powerful software, the miniaturization of hardware, and greater accessibility and affordability enabled novel applications of such virtual tools in surgical practice. This scoping rev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10040480 |
_version_ | 1785032167154253824 |
---|---|
author | Kaplan, Nicolas Marques, Mitchell Scharf, Isabel Yang, Kevin Alkureishi, Lee Purnell, Chad Patel, Pravin Zhao, Linping |
author_facet | Kaplan, Nicolas Marques, Mitchell Scharf, Isabel Yang, Kevin Alkureishi, Lee Purnell, Chad Patel, Pravin Zhao, Linping |
author_sort | Kaplan, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) have evolved since their introduction to medicine in the 1990s. More powerful software, the miniaturization of hardware, and greater accessibility and affordability enabled novel applications of such virtual tools in surgical practice. This scoping review aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the literature by including all articles between 2018 and 2021 pertaining to VR and AR and their use by plastic and craniofacial surgeons in a clinician-as-user, patient-specific manner. From the initial 1637 articles, 10 were eligible for final review. These discussed a variety of clinical applications: perforator flaps reconstruction, mastectomy reconstruction, lymphovenous anastomosis, metopic craniosynostosis, dermal filler injection, auricular reconstruction, facial vascularized composite allotransplantation, and facial artery mapping. More than half (60%) involved VR/AR use intraoperatively with the remainder (40%) examining preoperative use. The hardware used predominantly comprised HoloLens (40%) and smartphones (40%). In total, 9/10 Studies utilized an AR platform. This review found consensus that VR/AR in plastic and craniomaxillofacial surgery has been used to enhance surgeons’ knowledge of patient-specific anatomy and potentially facilitated decreased intraoperative time via preoperative planning. However, further outcome-focused research is required to better establish the usability of this technology in everyday practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10136227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101362272023-04-28 Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Plastic and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: A Scoping Review Kaplan, Nicolas Marques, Mitchell Scharf, Isabel Yang, Kevin Alkureishi, Lee Purnell, Chad Patel, Pravin Zhao, Linping Bioengineering (Basel) Review Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) have evolved since their introduction to medicine in the 1990s. More powerful software, the miniaturization of hardware, and greater accessibility and affordability enabled novel applications of such virtual tools in surgical practice. This scoping review aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the literature by including all articles between 2018 and 2021 pertaining to VR and AR and their use by plastic and craniofacial surgeons in a clinician-as-user, patient-specific manner. From the initial 1637 articles, 10 were eligible for final review. These discussed a variety of clinical applications: perforator flaps reconstruction, mastectomy reconstruction, lymphovenous anastomosis, metopic craniosynostosis, dermal filler injection, auricular reconstruction, facial vascularized composite allotransplantation, and facial artery mapping. More than half (60%) involved VR/AR use intraoperatively with the remainder (40%) examining preoperative use. The hardware used predominantly comprised HoloLens (40%) and smartphones (40%). In total, 9/10 Studies utilized an AR platform. This review found consensus that VR/AR in plastic and craniomaxillofacial surgery has been used to enhance surgeons’ knowledge of patient-specific anatomy and potentially facilitated decreased intraoperative time via preoperative planning. However, further outcome-focused research is required to better establish the usability of this technology in everyday practice. MDPI 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10136227/ /pubmed/37106667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10040480 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Kaplan, Nicolas Marques, Mitchell Scharf, Isabel Yang, Kevin Alkureishi, Lee Purnell, Chad Patel, Pravin Zhao, Linping Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Plastic and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: A Scoping Review |
title | Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Plastic and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Plastic and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Plastic and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Plastic and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Plastic and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | virtual reality and augmented reality in plastic and craniomaxillofacial surgery: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10040480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaplannicolas virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinplasticandcraniomaxillofacialsurgeryascopingreview AT marquesmitchell virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinplasticandcraniomaxillofacialsurgeryascopingreview AT scharfisabel virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinplasticandcraniomaxillofacialsurgeryascopingreview AT yangkevin virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinplasticandcraniomaxillofacialsurgeryascopingreview AT alkureishilee virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinplasticandcraniomaxillofacialsurgeryascopingreview AT purnellchad virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinplasticandcraniomaxillofacialsurgeryascopingreview AT patelpravin virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinplasticandcraniomaxillofacialsurgeryascopingreview AT zhaolinping virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinplasticandcraniomaxillofacialsurgeryascopingreview |