Cargando…

Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid

OBJECTIVE: Supporting patient-clinician communication is key to implementing tailored, risk-based screening for older adults. Objectives of this multiphase mixed methods study were to identify factors that primary care clinicians consider influential when making screening mammography recommendations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Braithwaite, Dejana, Chicaiza, Anthony, Lopez, Katherine, Lin, Kenneth W., Mishori, Ranit, Karanth, Shama D., Anton, Stephen, Miller, Kristen, Schonberg, Mara A., Schoenborn, Nancy L., O’Neill, Suzanne C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100132
_version_ 1785032202337124352
author Braithwaite, Dejana
Chicaiza, Anthony
Lopez, Katherine
Lin, Kenneth W.
Mishori, Ranit
Karanth, Shama D.
Anton, Stephen
Miller, Kristen
Schonberg, Mara A.
Schoenborn, Nancy L.
O’Neill, Suzanne C.
author_facet Braithwaite, Dejana
Chicaiza, Anthony
Lopez, Katherine
Lin, Kenneth W.
Mishori, Ranit
Karanth, Shama D.
Anton, Stephen
Miller, Kristen
Schonberg, Mara A.
Schoenborn, Nancy L.
O’Neill, Suzanne C.
author_sort Braithwaite, Dejana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Supporting patient-clinician communication is key to implementing tailored, risk-based screening for older adults. Objectives of this multiphase mixed methods study were to identify factors that primary care clinicians consider influential when making screening mammography recommendations for women ≥75 years, develop a patient decision aid that incorporates these factors, and gather feasibility and acceptability from the patients’ perspective. METHODS: Clinicians from a Mid-Atlantic practice network completed online surveys. Women in the same network completed surveys before and after receiving a tailored booklet that included information about the benefits and harms of screening for women ≥ 75 years, a breast cancer risk-estimate, and a question prompt list to support patient-clinician communication RESULTS: Clinicians (N=21) were primarily women [57.1%] and practiced family medicine [81.0%]. They cited patients’ age ≥75 years [95.4%], comorbidity [86.4%], functional status [77.3%], cancer family history [63.6%], U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines [81.8%] and new research [77.3%] as factors influencing their recommendations. Fourteen women completed baseline surveys and received personalized decision aids (Mean age=79.1 years). Eleven completed the post-intervention survey. All were satisfied with the booklet length, 81.8% found the booklet easy to understand and 72.7% helpful in decision-making Perceived lifetime breast cancer risk decreased significantly from pre- to post-intervention (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest this decision aid, which incorporates key decisional factors from the clinician's perspective, is feasible and acceptable to patients. INNOVATION: A tailored decision aid booklet is innovative as it provides information on personalized risk and potential benefits and harms to older women considering screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10136373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101363732023-05-19 Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid Braithwaite, Dejana Chicaiza, Anthony Lopez, Katherine Lin, Kenneth W. Mishori, Ranit Karanth, Shama D. Anton, Stephen Miller, Kristen Schonberg, Mara A. Schoenborn, Nancy L. O’Neill, Suzanne C. PEC Innov Full length article OBJECTIVE: Supporting patient-clinician communication is key to implementing tailored, risk-based screening for older adults. Objectives of this multiphase mixed methods study were to identify factors that primary care clinicians consider influential when making screening mammography recommendations for women ≥75 years, develop a patient decision aid that incorporates these factors, and gather feasibility and acceptability from the patients’ perspective. METHODS: Clinicians from a Mid-Atlantic practice network completed online surveys. Women in the same network completed surveys before and after receiving a tailored booklet that included information about the benefits and harms of screening for women ≥ 75 years, a breast cancer risk-estimate, and a question prompt list to support patient-clinician communication RESULTS: Clinicians (N=21) were primarily women [57.1%] and practiced family medicine [81.0%]. They cited patients’ age ≥75 years [95.4%], comorbidity [86.4%], functional status [77.3%], cancer family history [63.6%], U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines [81.8%] and new research [77.3%] as factors influencing their recommendations. Fourteen women completed baseline surveys and received personalized decision aids (Mean age=79.1 years). Eleven completed the post-intervention survey. All were satisfied with the booklet length, 81.8% found the booklet easy to understand and 72.7% helpful in decision-making Perceived lifetime breast cancer risk decreased significantly from pre- to post-intervention (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest this decision aid, which incorporates key decisional factors from the clinician's perspective, is feasible and acceptable to patients. INNOVATION: A tailored decision aid booklet is innovative as it provides information on personalized risk and potential benefits and harms to older women considering screening. Elsevier 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10136373/ /pubmed/37124453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100132 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full length article
Braithwaite, Dejana
Chicaiza, Anthony
Lopez, Katherine
Lin, Kenneth W.
Mishori, Ranit
Karanth, Shama D.
Anton, Stephen
Miller, Kristen
Schonberg, Mara A.
Schoenborn, Nancy L.
O’Neill, Suzanne C.
Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid
title Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid
title_full Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid
title_fullStr Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid
title_full_unstemmed Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid
title_short Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid
title_sort clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: a pilot study of a novel decision aid
topic Full length article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100132
work_keys_str_mv AT braithwaitedejana clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid
AT chicaizaanthony clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid
AT lopezkatherine clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid
AT linkennethw clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid
AT mishoriranit clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid
AT karanthshamad clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid
AT antonstephen clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid
AT millerkristen clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid
AT schonbergmaraa clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid
AT schoenbornnancyl clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid
AT oneillsuzannec clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid