Cargando…
Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid
OBJECTIVE: Supporting patient-clinician communication is key to implementing tailored, risk-based screening for older adults. Objectives of this multiphase mixed methods study were to identify factors that primary care clinicians consider influential when making screening mammography recommendations...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100132 |
_version_ | 1785032202337124352 |
---|---|
author | Braithwaite, Dejana Chicaiza, Anthony Lopez, Katherine Lin, Kenneth W. Mishori, Ranit Karanth, Shama D. Anton, Stephen Miller, Kristen Schonberg, Mara A. Schoenborn, Nancy L. O’Neill, Suzanne C. |
author_facet | Braithwaite, Dejana Chicaiza, Anthony Lopez, Katherine Lin, Kenneth W. Mishori, Ranit Karanth, Shama D. Anton, Stephen Miller, Kristen Schonberg, Mara A. Schoenborn, Nancy L. O’Neill, Suzanne C. |
author_sort | Braithwaite, Dejana |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Supporting patient-clinician communication is key to implementing tailored, risk-based screening for older adults. Objectives of this multiphase mixed methods study were to identify factors that primary care clinicians consider influential when making screening mammography recommendations for women ≥75 years, develop a patient decision aid that incorporates these factors, and gather feasibility and acceptability from the patients’ perspective. METHODS: Clinicians from a Mid-Atlantic practice network completed online surveys. Women in the same network completed surveys before and after receiving a tailored booklet that included information about the benefits and harms of screening for women ≥ 75 years, a breast cancer risk-estimate, and a question prompt list to support patient-clinician communication RESULTS: Clinicians (N=21) were primarily women [57.1%] and practiced family medicine [81.0%]. They cited patients’ age ≥75 years [95.4%], comorbidity [86.4%], functional status [77.3%], cancer family history [63.6%], U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines [81.8%] and new research [77.3%] as factors influencing their recommendations. Fourteen women completed baseline surveys and received personalized decision aids (Mean age=79.1 years). Eleven completed the post-intervention survey. All were satisfied with the booklet length, 81.8% found the booklet easy to understand and 72.7% helpful in decision-making Perceived lifetime breast cancer risk decreased significantly from pre- to post-intervention (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest this decision aid, which incorporates key decisional factors from the clinician's perspective, is feasible and acceptable to patients. INNOVATION: A tailored decision aid booklet is innovative as it provides information on personalized risk and potential benefits and harms to older women considering screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10136373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101363732023-05-19 Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid Braithwaite, Dejana Chicaiza, Anthony Lopez, Katherine Lin, Kenneth W. Mishori, Ranit Karanth, Shama D. Anton, Stephen Miller, Kristen Schonberg, Mara A. Schoenborn, Nancy L. O’Neill, Suzanne C. PEC Innov Full length article OBJECTIVE: Supporting patient-clinician communication is key to implementing tailored, risk-based screening for older adults. Objectives of this multiphase mixed methods study were to identify factors that primary care clinicians consider influential when making screening mammography recommendations for women ≥75 years, develop a patient decision aid that incorporates these factors, and gather feasibility and acceptability from the patients’ perspective. METHODS: Clinicians from a Mid-Atlantic practice network completed online surveys. Women in the same network completed surveys before and after receiving a tailored booklet that included information about the benefits and harms of screening for women ≥ 75 years, a breast cancer risk-estimate, and a question prompt list to support patient-clinician communication RESULTS: Clinicians (N=21) were primarily women [57.1%] and practiced family medicine [81.0%]. They cited patients’ age ≥75 years [95.4%], comorbidity [86.4%], functional status [77.3%], cancer family history [63.6%], U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines [81.8%] and new research [77.3%] as factors influencing their recommendations. Fourteen women completed baseline surveys and received personalized decision aids (Mean age=79.1 years). Eleven completed the post-intervention survey. All were satisfied with the booklet length, 81.8% found the booklet easy to understand and 72.7% helpful in decision-making Perceived lifetime breast cancer risk decreased significantly from pre- to post-intervention (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest this decision aid, which incorporates key decisional factors from the clinician's perspective, is feasible and acceptable to patients. INNOVATION: A tailored decision aid booklet is innovative as it provides information on personalized risk and potential benefits and harms to older women considering screening. Elsevier 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10136373/ /pubmed/37124453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100132 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Full length article Braithwaite, Dejana Chicaiza, Anthony Lopez, Katherine Lin, Kenneth W. Mishori, Ranit Karanth, Shama D. Anton, Stephen Miller, Kristen Schonberg, Mara A. Schoenborn, Nancy L. O’Neill, Suzanne C. Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid |
title | Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid |
title_full | Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid |
title_fullStr | Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid |
title_short | Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid |
title_sort | clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: a pilot study of a novel decision aid |
topic | Full length article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT braithwaitedejana clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid AT chicaizaanthony clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid AT lopezkatherine clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid AT linkennethw clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid AT mishoriranit clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid AT karanthshamad clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid AT antonstephen clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid AT millerkristen clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid AT schonbergmaraa clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid AT schoenbornnancyl clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid AT oneillsuzannec clinicianandpatientperspectivesonscreeningmammographyamongwomenage75andolderapilotstudyofanoveldecisionaid |