Cargando…
Patient-Initiated Follow-Up in Ovarian Cancer
This study aimed to assess the feasibility of patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) in combination with regular tumour marker monitoring as an alternative to conventional hospital follow-up for ovarian cancer survivors. Women who had recently completed treatment for ovarian cancer and had a raised pre-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185389 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30040276 |
_version_ | 1785032217904283648 |
---|---|
author | Luk, Hiu Mei Ngu, Siew Fei Lau, Lesley S. K. Tse, Ka Yu Chu, Mandy M. Y. Kwok, Shuk Tak Ngan, Hextan Y. S. Chan, Karen K. L. |
author_facet | Luk, Hiu Mei Ngu, Siew Fei Lau, Lesley S. K. Tse, Ka Yu Chu, Mandy M. Y. Kwok, Shuk Tak Ngan, Hextan Y. S. Chan, Karen K. L. |
author_sort | Luk, Hiu Mei |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to assess the feasibility of patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) in combination with regular tumour marker monitoring as an alternative to conventional hospital follow-up for ovarian cancer survivors. Women who had recently completed treatment for ovarian cancer and had a raised pre-treatment tumour marker were recruited. Participants were allocated to PIFU (intervention group) or conventional hospital follow-up (control group) according to their own preference. Both groups had regular tumour marker monitoring. The change in fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) score as measured by the FCR inventory, and the supportive care need (SCN) scores as measured by the SCN survey at baseline and at 6 months between PIFU and hospital follow-up were compared. Out of 64 participants, 37 (58%) opted for hospital follow-up and 27 (42%) opted for PIFU. During the 6-month study period, there was no significant difference in the change of FCR between the two groups (p = 0.35). There was a significant decrease in the sexuality unmet needs score in the intervention group from baseline to 6-month FU (mean difference −8.7, 95% confidence interval −16.1 to −1.4, p = 0.02). PIFU with tumour marker monitoring is a feasible follow-up approach in ovarian cancer survivorship care. FCR and SCN were comparable between PIFU and conventional hospital follow-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10136438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101364382023-04-28 Patient-Initiated Follow-Up in Ovarian Cancer Luk, Hiu Mei Ngu, Siew Fei Lau, Lesley S. K. Tse, Ka Yu Chu, Mandy M. Y. Kwok, Shuk Tak Ngan, Hextan Y. S. Chan, Karen K. L. Curr Oncol Article This study aimed to assess the feasibility of patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) in combination with regular tumour marker monitoring as an alternative to conventional hospital follow-up for ovarian cancer survivors. Women who had recently completed treatment for ovarian cancer and had a raised pre-treatment tumour marker were recruited. Participants were allocated to PIFU (intervention group) or conventional hospital follow-up (control group) according to their own preference. Both groups had regular tumour marker monitoring. The change in fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) score as measured by the FCR inventory, and the supportive care need (SCN) scores as measured by the SCN survey at baseline and at 6 months between PIFU and hospital follow-up were compared. Out of 64 participants, 37 (58%) opted for hospital follow-up and 27 (42%) opted for PIFU. During the 6-month study period, there was no significant difference in the change of FCR between the two groups (p = 0.35). There was a significant decrease in the sexuality unmet needs score in the intervention group from baseline to 6-month FU (mean difference −8.7, 95% confidence interval −16.1 to −1.4, p = 0.02). PIFU with tumour marker monitoring is a feasible follow-up approach in ovarian cancer survivorship care. FCR and SCN were comparable between PIFU and conventional hospital follow-up. MDPI 2023-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10136438/ /pubmed/37185389 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30040276 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Luk, Hiu Mei Ngu, Siew Fei Lau, Lesley S. K. Tse, Ka Yu Chu, Mandy M. Y. Kwok, Shuk Tak Ngan, Hextan Y. S. Chan, Karen K. L. Patient-Initiated Follow-Up in Ovarian Cancer |
title | Patient-Initiated Follow-Up in Ovarian Cancer |
title_full | Patient-Initiated Follow-Up in Ovarian Cancer |
title_fullStr | Patient-Initiated Follow-Up in Ovarian Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-Initiated Follow-Up in Ovarian Cancer |
title_short | Patient-Initiated Follow-Up in Ovarian Cancer |
title_sort | patient-initiated follow-up in ovarian cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185389 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30040276 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lukhiumei patientinitiatedfollowupinovariancancer AT ngusiewfei patientinitiatedfollowupinovariancancer AT laulesleysk patientinitiatedfollowupinovariancancer AT tsekayu patientinitiatedfollowupinovariancancer AT chumandymy patientinitiatedfollowupinovariancancer AT kwokshuktak patientinitiatedfollowupinovariancancer AT nganhextanys patientinitiatedfollowupinovariancancer AT chankarenkl patientinitiatedfollowupinovariancancer |