Cargando…
Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Myelodysplastic neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemias are often caused by gene mutations. Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become indispensable for mutational assessment and is widely used for disease classification, risk stratification, prognostication, and disease monitoring. I...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37190237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082305 |
_version_ | 1785032270301626368 |
---|---|
author | Jansko-Gadermeir, Bettina Leisch, Michael Gassner, Franz J. Zaborsky, Nadja Dillinger, Thomas Hutter, Sonja Risch, Angela Melchardt, Thomas Egle, Alexander Drost, Manuel Larcher-Senn, Julian Greil, Richard Pleyer, Lisa |
author_facet | Jansko-Gadermeir, Bettina Leisch, Michael Gassner, Franz J. Zaborsky, Nadja Dillinger, Thomas Hutter, Sonja Risch, Angela Melchardt, Thomas Egle, Alexander Drost, Manuel Larcher-Senn, Julian Greil, Richard Pleyer, Lisa |
author_sort | Jansko-Gadermeir, Bettina |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Myelodysplastic neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemias are often caused by gene mutations. Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become indispensable for mutational assessment and is widely used for disease classification, risk stratification, prognostication, and disease monitoring. In these diseases, the bone marrow blast percentage and hence bone marrow specimen remain pre-requisite for the above. Several groups, including ours, report that bone marrow evaluations, which can be painful and time-consuming, are only performed in ~50% of patients during follow-up outside of clinical trials, indicating a clinical need for surrogate samples. We therefore aimed to compare NGS results for paired bone marrow and peripheral blood samples. Our results clearly show, in a prospective setting, that sequential molecular analyses of peripheral blood specimens can be reliably used to molecularly classify and monitor myeloid neoplasms without loss of sensitivity or specificity, even in the absence of circulating blasts or in neutropenic patients. Hence, a bone marrow evaluation for the purpose of monitoring of mutations is not necessary. ABSTRACT: Background: Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become indispensable for diagnosis, risk stratification, prognostication, and monitoring of response in patients with myeloid neoplasias. Guidelines require bone marrow evaluations for the above, which are often not performed outside of clinical trials, indicating a need for surrogate samples. Methods: Myeloid NGS analyses (40 genes and 29 fusion drivers) of 240 consecutive, non-selected, prospectively collected, paired bone marrow/peripheral blood samples were compared. Findings: Very strong correlation (r = 0.91, p < 0.0001), high concordance (99.6%), sensitivity (98.8%), specificity (99.9%), positive predictive value (99.8%), and negative predictive value (99.6%) between NGS analyses of paired samples was observed. A total of 9/1321 (0.68%) detected mutations were discordant, 8 of which had a variant allele frequency (VAF) ≤ 3.7%. VAFs between peripheral blood and bone marrow samples were very strongly correlated in the total cohort (r = 0.93, p = 0.0001) and in subgroups without circulating blasts (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001) or with neutropenia (r = 0.88, p < 0.0001). There was a weak correlation between the VAF of a detected mutation and the blast count in either the peripheral blood (r = 0.19) or the bone marrow (r = 0.11). Interpretation: Peripheral blood samples can be used to molecularly classify and monitor myeloid neoplasms via NGS without loss of sensitivity/specificity, even in the absence of circulating blasts or in neutropenic patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10136651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101366512023-04-28 Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group Jansko-Gadermeir, Bettina Leisch, Michael Gassner, Franz J. Zaborsky, Nadja Dillinger, Thomas Hutter, Sonja Risch, Angela Melchardt, Thomas Egle, Alexander Drost, Manuel Larcher-Senn, Julian Greil, Richard Pleyer, Lisa Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Myelodysplastic neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemias are often caused by gene mutations. Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become indispensable for mutational assessment and is widely used for disease classification, risk stratification, prognostication, and disease monitoring. In these diseases, the bone marrow blast percentage and hence bone marrow specimen remain pre-requisite for the above. Several groups, including ours, report that bone marrow evaluations, which can be painful and time-consuming, are only performed in ~50% of patients during follow-up outside of clinical trials, indicating a clinical need for surrogate samples. We therefore aimed to compare NGS results for paired bone marrow and peripheral blood samples. Our results clearly show, in a prospective setting, that sequential molecular analyses of peripheral blood specimens can be reliably used to molecularly classify and monitor myeloid neoplasms without loss of sensitivity or specificity, even in the absence of circulating blasts or in neutropenic patients. Hence, a bone marrow evaluation for the purpose of monitoring of mutations is not necessary. ABSTRACT: Background: Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become indispensable for diagnosis, risk stratification, prognostication, and monitoring of response in patients with myeloid neoplasias. Guidelines require bone marrow evaluations for the above, which are often not performed outside of clinical trials, indicating a need for surrogate samples. Methods: Myeloid NGS analyses (40 genes and 29 fusion drivers) of 240 consecutive, non-selected, prospectively collected, paired bone marrow/peripheral blood samples were compared. Findings: Very strong correlation (r = 0.91, p < 0.0001), high concordance (99.6%), sensitivity (98.8%), specificity (99.9%), positive predictive value (99.8%), and negative predictive value (99.6%) between NGS analyses of paired samples was observed. A total of 9/1321 (0.68%) detected mutations were discordant, 8 of which had a variant allele frequency (VAF) ≤ 3.7%. VAFs between peripheral blood and bone marrow samples were very strongly correlated in the total cohort (r = 0.93, p = 0.0001) and in subgroups without circulating blasts (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001) or with neutropenia (r = 0.88, p < 0.0001). There was a weak correlation between the VAF of a detected mutation and the blast count in either the peripheral blood (r = 0.19) or the bone marrow (r = 0.11). Interpretation: Peripheral blood samples can be used to molecularly classify and monitor myeloid neoplasms via NGS without loss of sensitivity/specificity, even in the absence of circulating blasts or in neutropenic patients. MDPI 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10136651/ /pubmed/37190237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082305 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jansko-Gadermeir, Bettina Leisch, Michael Gassner, Franz J. Zaborsky, Nadja Dillinger, Thomas Hutter, Sonja Risch, Angela Melchardt, Thomas Egle, Alexander Drost, Manuel Larcher-Senn, Julian Greil, Richard Pleyer, Lisa Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group |
title | Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group |
title_full | Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group |
title_fullStr | Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group |
title_full_unstemmed | Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group |
title_short | Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group |
title_sort | myeloid ngs analyses of paired samples from bone marrow and peripheral blood yield concordant results: a prospective cohort analysis of the agmt study group |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37190237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082305 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janskogadermeirbettina myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup AT leischmichael myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup AT gassnerfranzj myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup AT zaborskynadja myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup AT dillingerthomas myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup AT huttersonja myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup AT rischangela myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup AT melchardtthomas myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup AT eglealexander myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup AT drostmanuel myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup AT larchersennjulian myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup AT greilrichard myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup AT pleyerlisa myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup |