Cargando…

Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Myelodysplastic neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemias are often caused by gene mutations. Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become indispensable for mutational assessment and is widely used for disease classification, risk stratification, prognostication, and disease monitoring. I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jansko-Gadermeir, Bettina, Leisch, Michael, Gassner, Franz J., Zaborsky, Nadja, Dillinger, Thomas, Hutter, Sonja, Risch, Angela, Melchardt, Thomas, Egle, Alexander, Drost, Manuel, Larcher-Senn, Julian, Greil, Richard, Pleyer, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37190237
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082305
_version_ 1785032270301626368
author Jansko-Gadermeir, Bettina
Leisch, Michael
Gassner, Franz J.
Zaborsky, Nadja
Dillinger, Thomas
Hutter, Sonja
Risch, Angela
Melchardt, Thomas
Egle, Alexander
Drost, Manuel
Larcher-Senn, Julian
Greil, Richard
Pleyer, Lisa
author_facet Jansko-Gadermeir, Bettina
Leisch, Michael
Gassner, Franz J.
Zaborsky, Nadja
Dillinger, Thomas
Hutter, Sonja
Risch, Angela
Melchardt, Thomas
Egle, Alexander
Drost, Manuel
Larcher-Senn, Julian
Greil, Richard
Pleyer, Lisa
author_sort Jansko-Gadermeir, Bettina
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Myelodysplastic neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemias are often caused by gene mutations. Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become indispensable for mutational assessment and is widely used for disease classification, risk stratification, prognostication, and disease monitoring. In these diseases, the bone marrow blast percentage and hence bone marrow specimen remain pre-requisite for the above. Several groups, including ours, report that bone marrow evaluations, which can be painful and time-consuming, are only performed in ~50% of patients during follow-up outside of clinical trials, indicating a clinical need for surrogate samples. We therefore aimed to compare NGS results for paired bone marrow and peripheral blood samples. Our results clearly show, in a prospective setting, that sequential molecular analyses of peripheral blood specimens can be reliably used to molecularly classify and monitor myeloid neoplasms without loss of sensitivity or specificity, even in the absence of circulating blasts or in neutropenic patients. Hence, a bone marrow evaluation for the purpose of monitoring of mutations is not necessary. ABSTRACT: Background: Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become indispensable for diagnosis, risk stratification, prognostication, and monitoring of response in patients with myeloid neoplasias. Guidelines require bone marrow evaluations for the above, which are often not performed outside of clinical trials, indicating a need for surrogate samples. Methods: Myeloid NGS analyses (40 genes and 29 fusion drivers) of 240 consecutive, non-selected, prospectively collected, paired bone marrow/peripheral blood samples were compared. Findings: Very strong correlation (r = 0.91, p < 0.0001), high concordance (99.6%), sensitivity (98.8%), specificity (99.9%), positive predictive value (99.8%), and negative predictive value (99.6%) between NGS analyses of paired samples was observed. A total of 9/1321 (0.68%) detected mutations were discordant, 8 of which had a variant allele frequency (VAF) ≤ 3.7%. VAFs between peripheral blood and bone marrow samples were very strongly correlated in the total cohort (r = 0.93, p = 0.0001) and in subgroups without circulating blasts (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001) or with neutropenia (r = 0.88, p < 0.0001). There was a weak correlation between the VAF of a detected mutation and the blast count in either the peripheral blood (r = 0.19) or the bone marrow (r = 0.11). Interpretation: Peripheral blood samples can be used to molecularly classify and monitor myeloid neoplasms via NGS without loss of sensitivity/specificity, even in the absence of circulating blasts or in neutropenic patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10136651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101366512023-04-28 Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group Jansko-Gadermeir, Bettina Leisch, Michael Gassner, Franz J. Zaborsky, Nadja Dillinger, Thomas Hutter, Sonja Risch, Angela Melchardt, Thomas Egle, Alexander Drost, Manuel Larcher-Senn, Julian Greil, Richard Pleyer, Lisa Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Myelodysplastic neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemias are often caused by gene mutations. Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become indispensable for mutational assessment and is widely used for disease classification, risk stratification, prognostication, and disease monitoring. In these diseases, the bone marrow blast percentage and hence bone marrow specimen remain pre-requisite for the above. Several groups, including ours, report that bone marrow evaluations, which can be painful and time-consuming, are only performed in ~50% of patients during follow-up outside of clinical trials, indicating a clinical need for surrogate samples. We therefore aimed to compare NGS results for paired bone marrow and peripheral blood samples. Our results clearly show, in a prospective setting, that sequential molecular analyses of peripheral blood specimens can be reliably used to molecularly classify and monitor myeloid neoplasms without loss of sensitivity or specificity, even in the absence of circulating blasts or in neutropenic patients. Hence, a bone marrow evaluation for the purpose of monitoring of mutations is not necessary. ABSTRACT: Background: Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become indispensable for diagnosis, risk stratification, prognostication, and monitoring of response in patients with myeloid neoplasias. Guidelines require bone marrow evaluations for the above, which are often not performed outside of clinical trials, indicating a need for surrogate samples. Methods: Myeloid NGS analyses (40 genes and 29 fusion drivers) of 240 consecutive, non-selected, prospectively collected, paired bone marrow/peripheral blood samples were compared. Findings: Very strong correlation (r = 0.91, p < 0.0001), high concordance (99.6%), sensitivity (98.8%), specificity (99.9%), positive predictive value (99.8%), and negative predictive value (99.6%) between NGS analyses of paired samples was observed. A total of 9/1321 (0.68%) detected mutations were discordant, 8 of which had a variant allele frequency (VAF) ≤ 3.7%. VAFs between peripheral blood and bone marrow samples were very strongly correlated in the total cohort (r = 0.93, p = 0.0001) and in subgroups without circulating blasts (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001) or with neutropenia (r = 0.88, p < 0.0001). There was a weak correlation between the VAF of a detected mutation and the blast count in either the peripheral blood (r = 0.19) or the bone marrow (r = 0.11). Interpretation: Peripheral blood samples can be used to molecularly classify and monitor myeloid neoplasms via NGS without loss of sensitivity/specificity, even in the absence of circulating blasts or in neutropenic patients. MDPI 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10136651/ /pubmed/37190237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082305 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jansko-Gadermeir, Bettina
Leisch, Michael
Gassner, Franz J.
Zaborsky, Nadja
Dillinger, Thomas
Hutter, Sonja
Risch, Angela
Melchardt, Thomas
Egle, Alexander
Drost, Manuel
Larcher-Senn, Julian
Greil, Richard
Pleyer, Lisa
Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group
title Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group
title_full Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group
title_fullStr Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group
title_full_unstemmed Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group
title_short Myeloid NGS Analyses of Paired Samples from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Yield Concordant Results: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of the AGMT Study Group
title_sort myeloid ngs analyses of paired samples from bone marrow and peripheral blood yield concordant results: a prospective cohort analysis of the agmt study group
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37190237
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082305
work_keys_str_mv AT janskogadermeirbettina myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup
AT leischmichael myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup
AT gassnerfranzj myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup
AT zaborskynadja myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup
AT dillingerthomas myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup
AT huttersonja myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup
AT rischangela myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup
AT melchardtthomas myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup
AT eglealexander myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup
AT drostmanuel myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup
AT larchersennjulian myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup
AT greilrichard myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup
AT pleyerlisa myeloidngsanalysesofpairedsamplesfrombonemarrowandperipheralbloodyieldconcordantresultsaprospectivecohortanalysisoftheagmtstudygroup