Cargando…
Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand?
In 2018, the da Vinci Single Port (SP) robotic system was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for urologic procedures. Available studies for the application of SP to prostate cancer surgery are limited. The aim of our study is to summarize the current evidence on the techniques and outco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30040328 |
_version_ | 1785032309022392320 |
---|---|
author | Franco, Antonio Pellegrino, Antony A. De Nunzio, Cosimo Salkowski, Morgan Jackson, Jamal C. Zukowski, Lucas B. Checcucci, Enrico Vourganti, Srinivas Chow, Alexander K. Porpiglia, Francesco Kaouk, Jihad Crivellaro, Simone Autorino, Riccardo |
author_facet | Franco, Antonio Pellegrino, Antony A. De Nunzio, Cosimo Salkowski, Morgan Jackson, Jamal C. Zukowski, Lucas B. Checcucci, Enrico Vourganti, Srinivas Chow, Alexander K. Porpiglia, Francesco Kaouk, Jihad Crivellaro, Simone Autorino, Riccardo |
author_sort | Franco, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2018, the da Vinci Single Port (SP) robotic system was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for urologic procedures. Available studies for the application of SP to prostate cancer surgery are limited. The aim of our study is to summarize the current evidence on the techniques and outcomes of SP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARLP) procedures. A narrative review of the literature was performed in January 2023. Preliminary results suggest that SP-RALP is safe and feasible, and it can offer comparable outcomes to the standard multiport RALP. Extraperitoneal and transvesical SP-RALP appear to be the two most promising approaches, as they offer decreased invasiveness, potentially shorter length of stay, and better pain control. Long-term, high-quality data are missing and further validation with prospective studies across different sites is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10136812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101368122023-04-28 Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand? Franco, Antonio Pellegrino, Antony A. De Nunzio, Cosimo Salkowski, Morgan Jackson, Jamal C. Zukowski, Lucas B. Checcucci, Enrico Vourganti, Srinivas Chow, Alexander K. Porpiglia, Francesco Kaouk, Jihad Crivellaro, Simone Autorino, Riccardo Curr Oncol Review In 2018, the da Vinci Single Port (SP) robotic system was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for urologic procedures. Available studies for the application of SP to prostate cancer surgery are limited. The aim of our study is to summarize the current evidence on the techniques and outcomes of SP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARLP) procedures. A narrative review of the literature was performed in January 2023. Preliminary results suggest that SP-RALP is safe and feasible, and it can offer comparable outcomes to the standard multiport RALP. Extraperitoneal and transvesical SP-RALP appear to be the two most promising approaches, as they offer decreased invasiveness, potentially shorter length of stay, and better pain control. Long-term, high-quality data are missing and further validation with prospective studies across different sites is required. MDPI 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10136812/ /pubmed/37185441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30040328 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Franco, Antonio Pellegrino, Antony A. De Nunzio, Cosimo Salkowski, Morgan Jackson, Jamal C. Zukowski, Lucas B. Checcucci, Enrico Vourganti, Srinivas Chow, Alexander K. Porpiglia, Francesco Kaouk, Jihad Crivellaro, Simone Autorino, Riccardo Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand? |
title | Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand? |
title_full | Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand? |
title_fullStr | Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand? |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand? |
title_short | Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand? |
title_sort | single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: where do we stand? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30040328 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT francoantonio singleportrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywheredowestand AT pellegrinoantonya singleportrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywheredowestand AT denunziocosimo singleportrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywheredowestand AT salkowskimorgan singleportrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywheredowestand AT jacksonjamalc singleportrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywheredowestand AT zukowskilucasb singleportrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywheredowestand AT checcuccienrico singleportrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywheredowestand AT vourgantisrinivas singleportrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywheredowestand AT chowalexanderk singleportrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywheredowestand AT porpigliafrancesco singleportrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywheredowestand AT kaoukjihad singleportrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywheredowestand AT crivellarosimone singleportrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywheredowestand AT autorinoriccardo singleportrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywheredowestand |