Cargando…

Imaging the WHO 2021 Brain Tumor Classification: Fully Automated Analysis of Imaging Features of Newly Diagnosed Gliomas

SIMPLE SUMMARY: With the release of the fifth WHO classification for CNS tumors in 2021, biology-based tumor classification is further advanced with the addition of molecular characteristics into diagnosis. This both poses challenges as well as opens up new opportunities for radiological diagnosis,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griessmair, Michael, Delbridge, Claire, Ziegenfeuter, Julian, Bernhardt, Denise, Gempt, Jens, Schmidt-Graf, Friederike, Kertels, Olivia, Thomas, Marie, Meyer, Hanno S., Zimmer, Claus, Meyer, Bernhard, Combs, Stephanie E., Yakushev, Igor, Wiestler, Benedikt, Metz, Marie-Christin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37190283
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082355
_version_ 1785032312088428544
author Griessmair, Michael
Delbridge, Claire
Ziegenfeuter, Julian
Bernhardt, Denise
Gempt, Jens
Schmidt-Graf, Friederike
Kertels, Olivia
Thomas, Marie
Meyer, Hanno S.
Zimmer, Claus
Meyer, Bernhard
Combs, Stephanie E.
Yakushev, Igor
Wiestler, Benedikt
Metz, Marie-Christin
author_facet Griessmair, Michael
Delbridge, Claire
Ziegenfeuter, Julian
Bernhardt, Denise
Gempt, Jens
Schmidt-Graf, Friederike
Kertels, Olivia
Thomas, Marie
Meyer, Hanno S.
Zimmer, Claus
Meyer, Bernhard
Combs, Stephanie E.
Yakushev, Igor
Wiestler, Benedikt
Metz, Marie-Christin
author_sort Griessmair, Michael
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: With the release of the fifth WHO classification for CNS tumors in 2021, biology-based tumor classification is further advanced with the addition of molecular characteristics into diagnosis. This both poses challenges as well as opens up new opportunities for radiological diagnosis, which was long based on the correspondence of imaging features and histological criteria. In this work, using advanced imaging and AI-based image processing on newly-diagnosed adult glioma patients (n = 226) with extensive molecular characterization, significant differences in biological MR imaging metrics among molecularly defined glioma subgroups were demonstrated. In particular, diffuse glioma (IDH wild type) with molecular characteristics of glioblastoma (now recognized as glioblastoma, WHO CNS grade 4) showed higher perfusion as well as increased cell density compared to “classical” glioblastoma (IDH wild type), WHO CNS grade 4, and astrocytoma (IDH mutant, 1p/19q non-codeleted), WHO CNS grade 4. Our results add relevantly to the emerging picture that fine tumor grading is possible in part by visualization of tumor biology with advanced MRI. ABSTRACT: Background: The fifth version of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) in 2021 brought substantial changes. Driven by the enhanced implementation of molecular characterization, some diagnoses were adapted while others were newly introduced. How these changes are reflected in imaging features remains scarcely investigated. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 226 treatment-naive primary brain tumor patients from our institution who received extensive molecular characterization by epigenome-wide methylation microarray and were diagnosed according to the 2021 WHO brain tumor classification. From multimodal preoperative 3T MRI scans, we extracted imaging metrics via a fully automated, AI-based image segmentation and processing pipeline. Subsequently, we examined differences in imaging features between the three main glioma entities (glioblastoma, astrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma) and particularly investigated new entities such as astrocytoma, WHO grade 4. Results: Our results confirm prior studies that found significantly higher median CBV (p = 0.00003, ANOVA) and lower median ADC in contrast-enhancing areas of glioblastomas, compared to astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas (p = 0.41333, ANOVA). Interestingly, molecularly defined glioblastoma, which usually does not contain contrast-enhancing areas, also shows significantly higher CBV values in the non-enhancing tumor than common glioblastoma and astrocytoma grade 4 (p = 0.01309, ANOVA). Conclusions: This work provides extensive insights into the imaging features of gliomas in light of the new 2021 WHO CNS tumor classification. Advanced imaging shows promise in visualizing tumor biology and improving the diagnosis of brain tumor patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10136825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101368252023-04-28 Imaging the WHO 2021 Brain Tumor Classification: Fully Automated Analysis of Imaging Features of Newly Diagnosed Gliomas Griessmair, Michael Delbridge, Claire Ziegenfeuter, Julian Bernhardt, Denise Gempt, Jens Schmidt-Graf, Friederike Kertels, Olivia Thomas, Marie Meyer, Hanno S. Zimmer, Claus Meyer, Bernhard Combs, Stephanie E. Yakushev, Igor Wiestler, Benedikt Metz, Marie-Christin Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: With the release of the fifth WHO classification for CNS tumors in 2021, biology-based tumor classification is further advanced with the addition of molecular characteristics into diagnosis. This both poses challenges as well as opens up new opportunities for radiological diagnosis, which was long based on the correspondence of imaging features and histological criteria. In this work, using advanced imaging and AI-based image processing on newly-diagnosed adult glioma patients (n = 226) with extensive molecular characterization, significant differences in biological MR imaging metrics among molecularly defined glioma subgroups were demonstrated. In particular, diffuse glioma (IDH wild type) with molecular characteristics of glioblastoma (now recognized as glioblastoma, WHO CNS grade 4) showed higher perfusion as well as increased cell density compared to “classical” glioblastoma (IDH wild type), WHO CNS grade 4, and astrocytoma (IDH mutant, 1p/19q non-codeleted), WHO CNS grade 4. Our results add relevantly to the emerging picture that fine tumor grading is possible in part by visualization of tumor biology with advanced MRI. ABSTRACT: Background: The fifth version of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) in 2021 brought substantial changes. Driven by the enhanced implementation of molecular characterization, some diagnoses were adapted while others were newly introduced. How these changes are reflected in imaging features remains scarcely investigated. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 226 treatment-naive primary brain tumor patients from our institution who received extensive molecular characterization by epigenome-wide methylation microarray and were diagnosed according to the 2021 WHO brain tumor classification. From multimodal preoperative 3T MRI scans, we extracted imaging metrics via a fully automated, AI-based image segmentation and processing pipeline. Subsequently, we examined differences in imaging features between the three main glioma entities (glioblastoma, astrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma) and particularly investigated new entities such as astrocytoma, WHO grade 4. Results: Our results confirm prior studies that found significantly higher median CBV (p = 0.00003, ANOVA) and lower median ADC in contrast-enhancing areas of glioblastomas, compared to astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas (p = 0.41333, ANOVA). Interestingly, molecularly defined glioblastoma, which usually does not contain contrast-enhancing areas, also shows significantly higher CBV values in the non-enhancing tumor than common glioblastoma and astrocytoma grade 4 (p = 0.01309, ANOVA). Conclusions: This work provides extensive insights into the imaging features of gliomas in light of the new 2021 WHO CNS tumor classification. Advanced imaging shows promise in visualizing tumor biology and improving the diagnosis of brain tumor patients. MDPI 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10136825/ /pubmed/37190283 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082355 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Griessmair, Michael
Delbridge, Claire
Ziegenfeuter, Julian
Bernhardt, Denise
Gempt, Jens
Schmidt-Graf, Friederike
Kertels, Olivia
Thomas, Marie
Meyer, Hanno S.
Zimmer, Claus
Meyer, Bernhard
Combs, Stephanie E.
Yakushev, Igor
Wiestler, Benedikt
Metz, Marie-Christin
Imaging the WHO 2021 Brain Tumor Classification: Fully Automated Analysis of Imaging Features of Newly Diagnosed Gliomas
title Imaging the WHO 2021 Brain Tumor Classification: Fully Automated Analysis of Imaging Features of Newly Diagnosed Gliomas
title_full Imaging the WHO 2021 Brain Tumor Classification: Fully Automated Analysis of Imaging Features of Newly Diagnosed Gliomas
title_fullStr Imaging the WHO 2021 Brain Tumor Classification: Fully Automated Analysis of Imaging Features of Newly Diagnosed Gliomas
title_full_unstemmed Imaging the WHO 2021 Brain Tumor Classification: Fully Automated Analysis of Imaging Features of Newly Diagnosed Gliomas
title_short Imaging the WHO 2021 Brain Tumor Classification: Fully Automated Analysis of Imaging Features of Newly Diagnosed Gliomas
title_sort imaging the who 2021 brain tumor classification: fully automated analysis of imaging features of newly diagnosed gliomas
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10136825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37190283
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082355
work_keys_str_mv AT griessmairmichael imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas
AT delbridgeclaire imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas
AT ziegenfeuterjulian imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas
AT bernhardtdenise imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas
AT gemptjens imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas
AT schmidtgraffriederike imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas
AT kertelsolivia imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas
AT thomasmarie imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas
AT meyerhannos imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas
AT zimmerclaus imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas
AT meyerbernhard imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas
AT combsstephaniee imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas
AT yakushevigor imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas
AT wiestlerbenedikt imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas
AT metzmariechristin imagingthewho2021braintumorclassificationfullyautomatedanalysisofimagingfeaturesofnewlydiagnosedgliomas