Cargando…

Safety of Early Bevacizumab Administration after Central Venous Port Placement for Patients with Colorectal Cancer

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The safety of bevacizumab administration immediately after central venous (CV) port placement, a minor surgery, is still unknown. We investigated whether Bevacizumab is safe when administered early after CV port placement. Bevacizumab therapy after CV port implantation did not affect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shigyo, Hirona, Suzuki, Hiroyuki, Tanaka, Toshimitsu, Moriyama, Etsuko, Shimotsuura, Yasutaka, Nagasu, Sachiko, Iwamoto, Hideki, Akagi, Yoshito, Murotani, Kenta, Kawaguchi, Takumi, Miwa, Keisuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10137085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37190192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082264
Descripción
Sumario:SIMPLE SUMMARY: The safety of bevacizumab administration immediately after central venous (CV) port placement, a minor surgery, is still unknown. We investigated whether Bevacizumab is safe when administered early after CV port placement. Bevacizumab therapy after CV port implantation did not affect the frequency of complications, regardless of the timing of initiation. These results support that bevacizumab is safe when administered early after CV port placement. ABSTRACT: Bevacizumab (BEV) requires an adequate withdrawal period to avoid BEV-related complications during major surgery. However, the safety of BEV administration immediately after surgical placement of the central venous (CV) port, a minor surgery, is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether BEV is safe when administered early after CV port placement. We retrospectively evaluated 184 patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with a BEV-containing regimen and divided them into two groups according to the interval between CV port implantation and chemotherapy initiation, with the early administration group being ≤7 days and late administration group being >7 days. Complications were then compared between the two groups. The early-administration group was significantly older and had a higher rate of colon cancer than the late-administration group. Overall, 24 (13%) patients developed CV port-related complications. Male sex was a risk factor for complications (odds ratio [OR], 3.154; 95% CI, 1.19–8.36). The two groups showed no significant difference in the frequency of complications (p = 0.84) or patient characteristics (after the inverse probability of treatment weighting, p = 0.537). In conclusion, the frequency of complications is not affected by the timing of BEV initiation after CV port implantation. Thus, early BEV administration after CV port placement is safe.