Cargando…
Can Australian general practitioners effectively screen for diabetic retinopathy? A pilot study
BACKGROUND: Diabetes has been identified as one of the national health priority areas in Australia. After 20 years of diabetes most patients can be expected to develop diabetic retinopathy which, if undetected, is likely to cause significant visual loss or blindness. This paper reports on a pilot st...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC101373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11884247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-3-4 |
_version_ | 1782120198276382720 |
---|---|
author | Jackson, Claire L Hirst, Laurence de Jong, Inge C Smith, Nadine |
author_facet | Jackson, Claire L Hirst, Laurence de Jong, Inge C Smith, Nadine |
author_sort | Jackson, Claire L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diabetes has been identified as one of the national health priority areas in Australia. After 20 years of diabetes most patients can be expected to develop diabetic retinopathy which, if undetected, is likely to cause significant visual loss or blindness. This paper reports on a pilot study aimed to test the ability of Australian GPs to clinically recognise diabetic retinopathy following a brief training intervention. METHOD: 17 GPs from a Brisbane Division of General Practice were recruited to participate in a clinical upskilling intervention pilot. Participant scores on clinical assessments were used to analyse GP sensitivity and specificity in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Results were compared with the NHMRC guidelines for acceptable screening accuracy. RESULTS: Ten of the 17 GPs (59%) achieved a screening sensitivity of 25% or less in the pre test, three (18%) a sensitivity of 50%, and four (23%) achieved a sensitivity of ≥ 75%. In the post-test, all seventeen GPs achieved between 50 and 100% sensitivity. In the pre-test, thirteen (76%) GPs achieved a screening specificity of less than or equal to 50%, and four (23%) a specificity of 75 %. In the post test, four GPs (23%) rated a screening specificity of less than 50%, six (35%) achieved a specificity of 66%, and seven (41%) 100% specificity. CONCLUSION: 24% of GPs met the NHMRC diabetic retinopathy screening criterion prior to the workshop, and 94% following this brief training intervention. Australian GPs are capable of a much more significant role in community screening for diabetic retinopathy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-101373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-1013732002-04-11 Can Australian general practitioners effectively screen for diabetic retinopathy? A pilot study Jackson, Claire L Hirst, Laurence de Jong, Inge C Smith, Nadine BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Diabetes has been identified as one of the national health priority areas in Australia. After 20 years of diabetes most patients can be expected to develop diabetic retinopathy which, if undetected, is likely to cause significant visual loss or blindness. This paper reports on a pilot study aimed to test the ability of Australian GPs to clinically recognise diabetic retinopathy following a brief training intervention. METHOD: 17 GPs from a Brisbane Division of General Practice were recruited to participate in a clinical upskilling intervention pilot. Participant scores on clinical assessments were used to analyse GP sensitivity and specificity in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Results were compared with the NHMRC guidelines for acceptable screening accuracy. RESULTS: Ten of the 17 GPs (59%) achieved a screening sensitivity of 25% or less in the pre test, three (18%) a sensitivity of 50%, and four (23%) achieved a sensitivity of ≥ 75%. In the post-test, all seventeen GPs achieved between 50 and 100% sensitivity. In the pre-test, thirteen (76%) GPs achieved a screening specificity of less than or equal to 50%, and four (23%) a specificity of 75 %. In the post test, four GPs (23%) rated a screening specificity of less than 50%, six (35%) achieved a specificity of 66%, and seven (41%) 100% specificity. CONCLUSION: 24% of GPs met the NHMRC diabetic retinopathy screening criterion prior to the workshop, and 94% following this brief training intervention. Australian GPs are capable of a much more significant role in community screening for diabetic retinopathy. BioMed Central 2002-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC101373/ /pubmed/11884247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-3-4 Text en Copyright © 2002 Jackson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jackson, Claire L Hirst, Laurence de Jong, Inge C Smith, Nadine Can Australian general practitioners effectively screen for diabetic retinopathy? A pilot study |
title | Can Australian general practitioners effectively screen for diabetic retinopathy? A pilot study |
title_full | Can Australian general practitioners effectively screen for diabetic retinopathy? A pilot study |
title_fullStr | Can Australian general practitioners effectively screen for diabetic retinopathy? A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Australian general practitioners effectively screen for diabetic retinopathy? A pilot study |
title_short | Can Australian general practitioners effectively screen for diabetic retinopathy? A pilot study |
title_sort | can australian general practitioners effectively screen for diabetic retinopathy? a pilot study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC101373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11884247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-3-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacksonclairel canaustraliangeneralpractitionerseffectivelyscreenfordiabeticretinopathyapilotstudy AT hirstlaurence canaustraliangeneralpractitionerseffectivelyscreenfordiabeticretinopathyapilotstudy AT dejongingec canaustraliangeneralpractitionerseffectivelyscreenfordiabeticretinopathyapilotstudy AT smithnadine canaustraliangeneralpractitionerseffectivelyscreenfordiabeticretinopathyapilotstudy |