Cargando…

A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture

Consumers are interested in plant-based alternatives (PBAs) to dairy and meat products, and as such, the food industry is responding by developing a variety of different plant-based food items. For these products to be successful, their textural properties must be acceptable to consumers. These text...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moss, Rachael, LeBlanc, Jeanne, Gorman, Mackenzie, Ritchie, Christopher, Duizer, Lisa, McSweeney, Matthew B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10137571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37107504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12081709
_version_ 1785032497521754112
author Moss, Rachael
LeBlanc, Jeanne
Gorman, Mackenzie
Ritchie, Christopher
Duizer, Lisa
McSweeney, Matthew B.
author_facet Moss, Rachael
LeBlanc, Jeanne
Gorman, Mackenzie
Ritchie, Christopher
Duizer, Lisa
McSweeney, Matthew B.
author_sort Moss, Rachael
collection PubMed
description Consumers are interested in plant-based alternatives (PBAs) to dairy and meat products, and as such, the food industry is responding by developing a variety of different plant-based food items. For these products to be successful, their textural properties must be acceptable to consumers. These textural properties need to be thoroughly investigated using different sensory methodologies to ensure consumer satisfaction. This review paper aims to summarize the various textural properties of PBAs, as well as to discuss the sensory methodologies that can be used in future studies of PBAs. PBAs to meat have been formulated using a variety of production technologies, but these products still have textural properties that differ from animal-based products. Most dairy and meat alternatives attempt to mimic their conventional counterparts, yet sensory trials rarely compare the PBAs to their meat or dairy counterparts. While most studies rely on consumers to investigate the acceptability of their products’ textural properties, future studies should include dynamic sensory methodologies, and attribute diagnostics questions to help product developers characterize the key sensory properties of their products. Studies should also indicate whether the product is meant to mimic a conventional product and should define the target consumer segment (ex. flexitarian, vegan) for the product. The importance of textural properties to PBAs is repeatedly mentioned in the literature and thus should be thoroughly investigated using robust sensory methodologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10137571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101375712023-04-28 A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture Moss, Rachael LeBlanc, Jeanne Gorman, Mackenzie Ritchie, Christopher Duizer, Lisa McSweeney, Matthew B. Foods Review Consumers are interested in plant-based alternatives (PBAs) to dairy and meat products, and as such, the food industry is responding by developing a variety of different plant-based food items. For these products to be successful, their textural properties must be acceptable to consumers. These textural properties need to be thoroughly investigated using different sensory methodologies to ensure consumer satisfaction. This review paper aims to summarize the various textural properties of PBAs, as well as to discuss the sensory methodologies that can be used in future studies of PBAs. PBAs to meat have been formulated using a variety of production technologies, but these products still have textural properties that differ from animal-based products. Most dairy and meat alternatives attempt to mimic their conventional counterparts, yet sensory trials rarely compare the PBAs to their meat or dairy counterparts. While most studies rely on consumers to investigate the acceptability of their products’ textural properties, future studies should include dynamic sensory methodologies, and attribute diagnostics questions to help product developers characterize the key sensory properties of their products. Studies should also indicate whether the product is meant to mimic a conventional product and should define the target consumer segment (ex. flexitarian, vegan) for the product. The importance of textural properties to PBAs is repeatedly mentioned in the literature and thus should be thoroughly investigated using robust sensory methodologies. MDPI 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10137571/ /pubmed/37107504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12081709 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Moss, Rachael
LeBlanc, Jeanne
Gorman, Mackenzie
Ritchie, Christopher
Duizer, Lisa
McSweeney, Matthew B.
A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture
title A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture
title_full A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture
title_fullStr A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture
title_short A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture
title_sort prospective review of the sensory properties of plant-based dairy and meat alternatives with a focus on texture
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10137571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37107504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12081709
work_keys_str_mv AT mossrachael aprospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture
AT leblancjeanne aprospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture
AT gormanmackenzie aprospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture
AT ritchiechristopher aprospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture
AT duizerlisa aprospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture
AT mcsweeneymatthewb aprospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture
AT mossrachael prospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture
AT leblancjeanne prospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture
AT gormanmackenzie prospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture
AT ritchiechristopher prospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture
AT duizerlisa prospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture
AT mcsweeneymatthewb prospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture