Cargando…
A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture
Consumers are interested in plant-based alternatives (PBAs) to dairy and meat products, and as such, the food industry is responding by developing a variety of different plant-based food items. For these products to be successful, their textural properties must be acceptable to consumers. These text...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10137571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37107504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12081709 |
_version_ | 1785032497521754112 |
---|---|
author | Moss, Rachael LeBlanc, Jeanne Gorman, Mackenzie Ritchie, Christopher Duizer, Lisa McSweeney, Matthew B. |
author_facet | Moss, Rachael LeBlanc, Jeanne Gorman, Mackenzie Ritchie, Christopher Duizer, Lisa McSweeney, Matthew B. |
author_sort | Moss, Rachael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Consumers are interested in plant-based alternatives (PBAs) to dairy and meat products, and as such, the food industry is responding by developing a variety of different plant-based food items. For these products to be successful, their textural properties must be acceptable to consumers. These textural properties need to be thoroughly investigated using different sensory methodologies to ensure consumer satisfaction. This review paper aims to summarize the various textural properties of PBAs, as well as to discuss the sensory methodologies that can be used in future studies of PBAs. PBAs to meat have been formulated using a variety of production technologies, but these products still have textural properties that differ from animal-based products. Most dairy and meat alternatives attempt to mimic their conventional counterparts, yet sensory trials rarely compare the PBAs to their meat or dairy counterparts. While most studies rely on consumers to investigate the acceptability of their products’ textural properties, future studies should include dynamic sensory methodologies, and attribute diagnostics questions to help product developers characterize the key sensory properties of their products. Studies should also indicate whether the product is meant to mimic a conventional product and should define the target consumer segment (ex. flexitarian, vegan) for the product. The importance of textural properties to PBAs is repeatedly mentioned in the literature and thus should be thoroughly investigated using robust sensory methodologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10137571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101375712023-04-28 A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture Moss, Rachael LeBlanc, Jeanne Gorman, Mackenzie Ritchie, Christopher Duizer, Lisa McSweeney, Matthew B. Foods Review Consumers are interested in plant-based alternatives (PBAs) to dairy and meat products, and as such, the food industry is responding by developing a variety of different plant-based food items. For these products to be successful, their textural properties must be acceptable to consumers. These textural properties need to be thoroughly investigated using different sensory methodologies to ensure consumer satisfaction. This review paper aims to summarize the various textural properties of PBAs, as well as to discuss the sensory methodologies that can be used in future studies of PBAs. PBAs to meat have been formulated using a variety of production technologies, but these products still have textural properties that differ from animal-based products. Most dairy and meat alternatives attempt to mimic their conventional counterparts, yet sensory trials rarely compare the PBAs to their meat or dairy counterparts. While most studies rely on consumers to investigate the acceptability of their products’ textural properties, future studies should include dynamic sensory methodologies, and attribute diagnostics questions to help product developers characterize the key sensory properties of their products. Studies should also indicate whether the product is meant to mimic a conventional product and should define the target consumer segment (ex. flexitarian, vegan) for the product. The importance of textural properties to PBAs is repeatedly mentioned in the literature and thus should be thoroughly investigated using robust sensory methodologies. MDPI 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10137571/ /pubmed/37107504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12081709 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Moss, Rachael LeBlanc, Jeanne Gorman, Mackenzie Ritchie, Christopher Duizer, Lisa McSweeney, Matthew B. A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture |
title | A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture |
title_full | A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture |
title_fullStr | A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture |
title_full_unstemmed | A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture |
title_short | A Prospective Review of the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives with a Focus on Texture |
title_sort | prospective review of the sensory properties of plant-based dairy and meat alternatives with a focus on texture |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10137571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37107504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12081709 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mossrachael aprospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture AT leblancjeanne aprospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture AT gormanmackenzie aprospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture AT ritchiechristopher aprospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture AT duizerlisa aprospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture AT mcsweeneymatthewb aprospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture AT mossrachael prospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture AT leblancjeanne prospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture AT gormanmackenzie prospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture AT ritchiechristopher prospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture AT duizerlisa prospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture AT mcsweeneymatthewb prospectivereviewofthesensorypropertiesofplantbaseddairyandmeatalternativeswithafocusontexture |