Cargando…

Impedimetric Polyaniline-Based Aptasensor for Aflatoxin B(1) Determination in Agricultural Products

An impedimetric aptasensor based on a polyaniline (PAni) support matrix is developed through the surface modification of a screen-printed carbon electrode (SPE) for aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1)) detection in foodstuffs and feedstuffs for food safety. The PAni is synthesized with the chemical oxidation met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ong, Jing Yi, Phang, Sook-Wai, Goh, Choo Ta, Pike, Andrew, Tan, Ling Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10137590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37107493
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12081698
Descripción
Sumario:An impedimetric aptasensor based on a polyaniline (PAni) support matrix is developed through the surface modification of a screen-printed carbon electrode (SPE) for aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1)) detection in foodstuffs and feedstuffs for food safety. The PAni is synthesized with the chemical oxidation method and characterized with potentiostat/galvanostat, FTIR, and UV–vis spectroscopy techniques. The stepwise fabrication procedure of the PAni-based aptasensor is characterized by means of cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) methods. The impedimetric aptasensor is optimized using the EIS technique, and its feasibility of detecting AFB(1) in real sample matrices is evaluated via a recovery study in spiked foodstuffs and feedstuffs, such as pistachio nuts, cinnamons, cloves, corn, and soybeans, with a good recovery percentage, ranging from 87.9% to 94.7%. The charge transfer resistance (R(CT)) at the aptasensor interface increases linearly with the AFB(1) concentration in the range of 3 × 10(−2) nM to 8 × 10(−2) nM, with a regression coefficient (R(2)) value of 0.9991 and detection limit of 0.01 nM. The proposed aptasensor is highly selective towards AFB(1) and partially selective to AFB(2) and ochratoxin A (OTA) due to their similar structures that differ only at the carbon–carbon double bond located at C(8) and C(9) and the large molecule size of OTA.