Cargando…

Onset Time of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared with Its Thoracic Counterpart: Case Reports

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) at the level of the fifth thoracic vertebra (T5) is a novel technique, first published in 2016, which was found to be effective in both acute and chronic pain control. The mechanism of action and spread of local anesthetic of the ESPB at the lumbar region are th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Wei-Chen, Kuo, Yi-Jie, Chan, Shun-Ming, Hou, Jin-De, Lin, Ting-Hsun, Lin, Jui-An
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10137791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37107992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081158
_version_ 1785032551997374464
author Chung, Wei-Chen
Kuo, Yi-Jie
Chan, Shun-Ming
Hou, Jin-De
Lin, Ting-Hsun
Lin, Jui-An
author_facet Chung, Wei-Chen
Kuo, Yi-Jie
Chan, Shun-Ming
Hou, Jin-De
Lin, Ting-Hsun
Lin, Jui-An
author_sort Chung, Wei-Chen
collection PubMed
description The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) at the level of the fifth thoracic vertebra (T5) is a novel technique, first published in 2016, which was found to be effective in both acute and chronic pain control. The mechanism of action and spread of local anesthetic of the ESPB at the lumbar region are thought to differ from those of the thoracic ESPB; however, the difference in onset time has never been evaluated. As for the onset of lumbar ESPBs, we presented three cases: two received lumbar ESPBs (one with chronic low back pain and one with acute postoperative hip pain), and the third one with chronic back pain received a thoracic ESPB. We administered 30 mL of 0.3% ropivacaine in all three patients, but the analgesic effect did not reach its maximum until 3 and 1.5 h, respectively, in the lumbar ESPB cases. On the contrary, the thoracic ESPB case experienced noticeable pain relief within 30 min. The onset time was considerably longer than that reported in earlier reports on ESPBs, and the lumbar ESPB achieved its peak effect much later than the thoracic ESPB using the same formula of local anesthetic. While the delayed-onset lumbar ESPB may have some drawbacks for treating acute postoperative pain, it still could produce significant analgesia, once it took effect, when given to patients suffering from hip surgery with large incisions and intractable low back pain. The current data suggested that the onset time of a lumbar ESPB may be delayed compared with its thoracic counterpart. Therefore, the local anesthetic formula and injection timing should be adjusted for a lumbar ESPB when applied in the perioperative period to make the onset of the analgesic effect coincide with the immediate postoperative pain. Without this concept in mind, clinicians may consider a lumbar ESPB to be ineffective before it takes effect, and consequently treat the patients inadequately with this technique. Future randomized controlled trials should be designed according to our observations to compare lumbar ESPB with its thoracic counterpart regarding onset time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10137791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101377912023-04-28 Onset Time of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared with Its Thoracic Counterpart: Case Reports Chung, Wei-Chen Kuo, Yi-Jie Chan, Shun-Ming Hou, Jin-De Lin, Ting-Hsun Lin, Jui-An Healthcare (Basel) Case Report The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) at the level of the fifth thoracic vertebra (T5) is a novel technique, first published in 2016, which was found to be effective in both acute and chronic pain control. The mechanism of action and spread of local anesthetic of the ESPB at the lumbar region are thought to differ from those of the thoracic ESPB; however, the difference in onset time has never been evaluated. As for the onset of lumbar ESPBs, we presented three cases: two received lumbar ESPBs (one with chronic low back pain and one with acute postoperative hip pain), and the third one with chronic back pain received a thoracic ESPB. We administered 30 mL of 0.3% ropivacaine in all three patients, but the analgesic effect did not reach its maximum until 3 and 1.5 h, respectively, in the lumbar ESPB cases. On the contrary, the thoracic ESPB case experienced noticeable pain relief within 30 min. The onset time was considerably longer than that reported in earlier reports on ESPBs, and the lumbar ESPB achieved its peak effect much later than the thoracic ESPB using the same formula of local anesthetic. While the delayed-onset lumbar ESPB may have some drawbacks for treating acute postoperative pain, it still could produce significant analgesia, once it took effect, when given to patients suffering from hip surgery with large incisions and intractable low back pain. The current data suggested that the onset time of a lumbar ESPB may be delayed compared with its thoracic counterpart. Therefore, the local anesthetic formula and injection timing should be adjusted for a lumbar ESPB when applied in the perioperative period to make the onset of the analgesic effect coincide with the immediate postoperative pain. Without this concept in mind, clinicians may consider a lumbar ESPB to be ineffective before it takes effect, and consequently treat the patients inadequately with this technique. Future randomized controlled trials should be designed according to our observations to compare lumbar ESPB with its thoracic counterpart regarding onset time. MDPI 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10137791/ /pubmed/37107992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081158 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Chung, Wei-Chen
Kuo, Yi-Jie
Chan, Shun-Ming
Hou, Jin-De
Lin, Ting-Hsun
Lin, Jui-An
Onset Time of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared with Its Thoracic Counterpart: Case Reports
title Onset Time of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared with Its Thoracic Counterpart: Case Reports
title_full Onset Time of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared with Its Thoracic Counterpart: Case Reports
title_fullStr Onset Time of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared with Its Thoracic Counterpart: Case Reports
title_full_unstemmed Onset Time of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared with Its Thoracic Counterpart: Case Reports
title_short Onset Time of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared with Its Thoracic Counterpart: Case Reports
title_sort onset time of lumbar erector spinae plane block compared with its thoracic counterpart: case reports
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10137791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37107992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081158
work_keys_str_mv AT chungweichen onsettimeoflumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockcomparedwithitsthoraciccounterpartcasereports
AT kuoyijie onsettimeoflumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockcomparedwithitsthoraciccounterpartcasereports
AT chanshunming onsettimeoflumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockcomparedwithitsthoraciccounterpartcasereports
AT houjinde onsettimeoflumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockcomparedwithitsthoraciccounterpartcasereports
AT lintinghsun onsettimeoflumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockcomparedwithitsthoraciccounterpartcasereports
AT linjuian onsettimeoflumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockcomparedwithitsthoraciccounterpartcasereports