Cargando…

Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T/C) received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) based on results of a clinical trial conducted prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant. The clinical effectiveness of T/C has not been well described in the Omicron er...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Benjamin, Haste, Nina, Binkin, Nancy, Law, Nancy, Horton, Lucy E., Yam, Nancy, Chen, Victor, Abeles, Shira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37104498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275356
_version_ 1785032657035329536
author Chen, Benjamin
Haste, Nina
Binkin, Nancy
Law, Nancy
Horton, Lucy E.
Yam, Nancy
Chen, Victor
Abeles, Shira
author_facet Chen, Benjamin
Haste, Nina
Binkin, Nancy
Law, Nancy
Horton, Lucy E.
Yam, Nancy
Chen, Victor
Abeles, Shira
author_sort Chen, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T/C) received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) based on results of a clinical trial conducted prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant. The clinical effectiveness of T/C has not been well described in the Omicron era. We examined the incidence of symptomatic illness and hospitalizations among T/C recipients when Omicron accounted for virtually all local cases. METHODS: Through retrospective electronic medical record chart review, we identified patients who received T/C between January 1 –July 31, 2022 within our quaternary referral health system. We determined the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations due to or presumed to be caused by early Omicron variants before and after receiving T/C (pre-T/C and post-T/C). Chi square and Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon two-sample tests were used to examine differences between the characteristics of those who got COVID-19 before or after T/C prophylaxis, and rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess differences in hospitalization rates for the two groups. RESULTS: Of 1295 T/C recipients, 105 (8.1%) developed symptomatic COVID-19 infection before receiving T/C, and 102 (7.9%) developed symptomatic disease after receiving it. Of the 105 patients who developed symptomatic infection pre-T/C, 26 (24.8%) were hospitalized, compared with six of the 102 patients (5.9%) who were diagnosed with COVID-19 post-T/C (RR = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.10–0.55; p = 0.0002). Seven of the 105 (6.7%) patients infected pre-T/C, but none of the 102 infected post-T/C required ICU care. No COVID-related deaths occurred in either group. The majority of COVID-19 cases among those infected pre-T/C treatment occurred during the Omicron BA.1 surge, while the majority of post-T/C cases occurred when Omicron BA.5 was predominant. In both groups, having at least one dose of vaccine strongly protected against hospitalization (pre-T/C group RR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.17–0.57, p = 0.02; post-T/C group RR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.03–0.94; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: We identified COVID-19 infections after T/C prophylaxis. Among patients who received T/C at our institution, COVID-19 Omicron cases occurring after T/C were one-fourth as likely to require hospitalization compared to those with Omicron prior to T/C. However, due to the presence of changing vaccine coverage, multiple therapies, and changing variants, the effectiveness of T/C in the Omicron era remains difficult to assess.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10138227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101382272023-04-28 Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era Chen, Benjamin Haste, Nina Binkin, Nancy Law, Nancy Horton, Lucy E. Yam, Nancy Chen, Victor Abeles, Shira PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T/C) received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) based on results of a clinical trial conducted prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant. The clinical effectiveness of T/C has not been well described in the Omicron era. We examined the incidence of symptomatic illness and hospitalizations among T/C recipients when Omicron accounted for virtually all local cases. METHODS: Through retrospective electronic medical record chart review, we identified patients who received T/C between January 1 –July 31, 2022 within our quaternary referral health system. We determined the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations due to or presumed to be caused by early Omicron variants before and after receiving T/C (pre-T/C and post-T/C). Chi square and Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon two-sample tests were used to examine differences between the characteristics of those who got COVID-19 before or after T/C prophylaxis, and rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess differences in hospitalization rates for the two groups. RESULTS: Of 1295 T/C recipients, 105 (8.1%) developed symptomatic COVID-19 infection before receiving T/C, and 102 (7.9%) developed symptomatic disease after receiving it. Of the 105 patients who developed symptomatic infection pre-T/C, 26 (24.8%) were hospitalized, compared with six of the 102 patients (5.9%) who were diagnosed with COVID-19 post-T/C (RR = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.10–0.55; p = 0.0002). Seven of the 105 (6.7%) patients infected pre-T/C, but none of the 102 infected post-T/C required ICU care. No COVID-related deaths occurred in either group. The majority of COVID-19 cases among those infected pre-T/C treatment occurred during the Omicron BA.1 surge, while the majority of post-T/C cases occurred when Omicron BA.5 was predominant. In both groups, having at least one dose of vaccine strongly protected against hospitalization (pre-T/C group RR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.17–0.57, p = 0.02; post-T/C group RR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.03–0.94; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: We identified COVID-19 infections after T/C prophylaxis. Among patients who received T/C at our institution, COVID-19 Omicron cases occurring after T/C were one-fourth as likely to require hospitalization compared to those with Omicron prior to T/C. However, due to the presence of changing vaccine coverage, multiple therapies, and changing variants, the effectiveness of T/C in the Omicron era remains difficult to assess. Public Library of Science 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10138227/ /pubmed/37104498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275356 Text en © 2023 Chen et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Benjamin
Haste, Nina
Binkin, Nancy
Law, Nancy
Horton, Lucy E.
Yam, Nancy
Chen, Victor
Abeles, Shira
Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era
title Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era
title_full Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era
title_fullStr Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era
title_full_unstemmed Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era
title_short Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era
title_sort real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (evusheld) in the omicron era
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37104498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275356
work_keys_str_mv AT chenbenjamin realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera
AT hastenina realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera
AT binkinnancy realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera
AT lawnancy realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera
AT hortonlucye realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera
AT yamnancy realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera
AT chenvictor realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera
AT abelesshira realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera