Cargando…
Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era
BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T/C) received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) based on results of a clinical trial conducted prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant. The clinical effectiveness of T/C has not been well described in the Omicron er...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37104498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275356 |
_version_ | 1785032657035329536 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Benjamin Haste, Nina Binkin, Nancy Law, Nancy Horton, Lucy E. Yam, Nancy Chen, Victor Abeles, Shira |
author_facet | Chen, Benjamin Haste, Nina Binkin, Nancy Law, Nancy Horton, Lucy E. Yam, Nancy Chen, Victor Abeles, Shira |
author_sort | Chen, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T/C) received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) based on results of a clinical trial conducted prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant. The clinical effectiveness of T/C has not been well described in the Omicron era. We examined the incidence of symptomatic illness and hospitalizations among T/C recipients when Omicron accounted for virtually all local cases. METHODS: Through retrospective electronic medical record chart review, we identified patients who received T/C between January 1 –July 31, 2022 within our quaternary referral health system. We determined the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations due to or presumed to be caused by early Omicron variants before and after receiving T/C (pre-T/C and post-T/C). Chi square and Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon two-sample tests were used to examine differences between the characteristics of those who got COVID-19 before or after T/C prophylaxis, and rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess differences in hospitalization rates for the two groups. RESULTS: Of 1295 T/C recipients, 105 (8.1%) developed symptomatic COVID-19 infection before receiving T/C, and 102 (7.9%) developed symptomatic disease after receiving it. Of the 105 patients who developed symptomatic infection pre-T/C, 26 (24.8%) were hospitalized, compared with six of the 102 patients (5.9%) who were diagnosed with COVID-19 post-T/C (RR = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.10–0.55; p = 0.0002). Seven of the 105 (6.7%) patients infected pre-T/C, but none of the 102 infected post-T/C required ICU care. No COVID-related deaths occurred in either group. The majority of COVID-19 cases among those infected pre-T/C treatment occurred during the Omicron BA.1 surge, while the majority of post-T/C cases occurred when Omicron BA.5 was predominant. In both groups, having at least one dose of vaccine strongly protected against hospitalization (pre-T/C group RR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.17–0.57, p = 0.02; post-T/C group RR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.03–0.94; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: We identified COVID-19 infections after T/C prophylaxis. Among patients who received T/C at our institution, COVID-19 Omicron cases occurring after T/C were one-fourth as likely to require hospitalization compared to those with Omicron prior to T/C. However, due to the presence of changing vaccine coverage, multiple therapies, and changing variants, the effectiveness of T/C in the Omicron era remains difficult to assess. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10138227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101382272023-04-28 Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era Chen, Benjamin Haste, Nina Binkin, Nancy Law, Nancy Horton, Lucy E. Yam, Nancy Chen, Victor Abeles, Shira PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T/C) received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) based on results of a clinical trial conducted prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant. The clinical effectiveness of T/C has not been well described in the Omicron era. We examined the incidence of symptomatic illness and hospitalizations among T/C recipients when Omicron accounted for virtually all local cases. METHODS: Through retrospective electronic medical record chart review, we identified patients who received T/C between January 1 –July 31, 2022 within our quaternary referral health system. We determined the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations due to or presumed to be caused by early Omicron variants before and after receiving T/C (pre-T/C and post-T/C). Chi square and Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon two-sample tests were used to examine differences between the characteristics of those who got COVID-19 before or after T/C prophylaxis, and rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess differences in hospitalization rates for the two groups. RESULTS: Of 1295 T/C recipients, 105 (8.1%) developed symptomatic COVID-19 infection before receiving T/C, and 102 (7.9%) developed symptomatic disease after receiving it. Of the 105 patients who developed symptomatic infection pre-T/C, 26 (24.8%) were hospitalized, compared with six of the 102 patients (5.9%) who were diagnosed with COVID-19 post-T/C (RR = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.10–0.55; p = 0.0002). Seven of the 105 (6.7%) patients infected pre-T/C, but none of the 102 infected post-T/C required ICU care. No COVID-related deaths occurred in either group. The majority of COVID-19 cases among those infected pre-T/C treatment occurred during the Omicron BA.1 surge, while the majority of post-T/C cases occurred when Omicron BA.5 was predominant. In both groups, having at least one dose of vaccine strongly protected against hospitalization (pre-T/C group RR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.17–0.57, p = 0.02; post-T/C group RR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.03–0.94; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: We identified COVID-19 infections after T/C prophylaxis. Among patients who received T/C at our institution, COVID-19 Omicron cases occurring after T/C were one-fourth as likely to require hospitalization compared to those with Omicron prior to T/C. However, due to the presence of changing vaccine coverage, multiple therapies, and changing variants, the effectiveness of T/C in the Omicron era remains difficult to assess. Public Library of Science 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10138227/ /pubmed/37104498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275356 Text en © 2023 Chen et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chen, Benjamin Haste, Nina Binkin, Nancy Law, Nancy Horton, Lucy E. Yam, Nancy Chen, Victor Abeles, Shira Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era |
title | Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era |
title_full | Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era |
title_fullStr | Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era |
title_full_unstemmed | Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era |
title_short | Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era |
title_sort | real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (evusheld) in the omicron era |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37104498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275356 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenbenjamin realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera AT hastenina realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera AT binkinnancy realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera AT lawnancy realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera AT hortonlucye realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera AT yamnancy realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera AT chenvictor realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera AT abelesshira realworldeffectivenessoftixagevimabcilgavimabevusheldintheomicronera |