Cargando…
Industry involvement in evidence production for genomic medicine: A bibliometric and funding analysis of decision impact studies
BACKGROUND: Decision impact studies have become increasingly prevalent in genomic medicine, particularly in cancer research. Such studies are designed to provide evidence of clinical utility for genomic tests by evaluating their impact on clinical decision-making. This paper offers insights into und...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37104298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285122 |
_version_ | 1785032664714051584 |
---|---|
author | Parker, Gillian Hunter, Sarah Hogarth, Stuart Miller, Fiona A. |
author_facet | Parker, Gillian Hunter, Sarah Hogarth, Stuart Miller, Fiona A. |
author_sort | Parker, Gillian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Decision impact studies have become increasingly prevalent in genomic medicine, particularly in cancer research. Such studies are designed to provide evidence of clinical utility for genomic tests by evaluating their impact on clinical decision-making. This paper offers insights into understanding of the origins and intentions of these studies through an analysis of the actors and institutions responsible for the production of this new type of evidence. METHODS: We conducted bibliometric and funding analyses of decision impact studies in genomic medicine research. We searched databases from inception to June 2022. The datasets used were primarily from Web of Science. Biblioshiny, additional R-based applications, and Microsoft Excel were used for publication, co-authorship and co-word analyses. RESULTS: 163 publications were included for the bibliometric analysis; a subset of 125 studies were included for the funding analysis. Included publications started in 2010 and increased steadily over time. Decision impact studies were primarily produced for proprietary genomic assays for use in cancer care. The author and affiliate analyses reveal that these studies were produced by ‘invisible colleges’ of researchers and industry actors with collaborations focused on producing evidence for proprietary assays. Most authors had an industry affiliation, and the majority of studies were funded by industry. While studies were conducted in 22 countries, the majority had at least one author from the USA. DISCUSSION: This study is a critical step in understanding the role of industry in the production of new types of research. Based on the data collected, we conclude that decision impact studies are industry-conceived and -produced evidence. The findings of this study demonstrate the depth of industry involvement and highlight a need for further research into the use of these studies in decision-making for coverage and reimbursement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10138259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101382592023-04-28 Industry involvement in evidence production for genomic medicine: A bibliometric and funding analysis of decision impact studies Parker, Gillian Hunter, Sarah Hogarth, Stuart Miller, Fiona A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Decision impact studies have become increasingly prevalent in genomic medicine, particularly in cancer research. Such studies are designed to provide evidence of clinical utility for genomic tests by evaluating their impact on clinical decision-making. This paper offers insights into understanding of the origins and intentions of these studies through an analysis of the actors and institutions responsible for the production of this new type of evidence. METHODS: We conducted bibliometric and funding analyses of decision impact studies in genomic medicine research. We searched databases from inception to June 2022. The datasets used were primarily from Web of Science. Biblioshiny, additional R-based applications, and Microsoft Excel were used for publication, co-authorship and co-word analyses. RESULTS: 163 publications were included for the bibliometric analysis; a subset of 125 studies were included for the funding analysis. Included publications started in 2010 and increased steadily over time. Decision impact studies were primarily produced for proprietary genomic assays for use in cancer care. The author and affiliate analyses reveal that these studies were produced by ‘invisible colleges’ of researchers and industry actors with collaborations focused on producing evidence for proprietary assays. Most authors had an industry affiliation, and the majority of studies were funded by industry. While studies were conducted in 22 countries, the majority had at least one author from the USA. DISCUSSION: This study is a critical step in understanding the role of industry in the production of new types of research. Based on the data collected, we conclude that decision impact studies are industry-conceived and -produced evidence. The findings of this study demonstrate the depth of industry involvement and highlight a need for further research into the use of these studies in decision-making for coverage and reimbursement. Public Library of Science 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10138259/ /pubmed/37104298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285122 Text en © 2023 Parker et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Parker, Gillian Hunter, Sarah Hogarth, Stuart Miller, Fiona A. Industry involvement in evidence production for genomic medicine: A bibliometric and funding analysis of decision impact studies |
title | Industry involvement in evidence production for genomic medicine: A bibliometric and funding analysis of decision impact studies |
title_full | Industry involvement in evidence production for genomic medicine: A bibliometric and funding analysis of decision impact studies |
title_fullStr | Industry involvement in evidence production for genomic medicine: A bibliometric and funding analysis of decision impact studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Industry involvement in evidence production for genomic medicine: A bibliometric and funding analysis of decision impact studies |
title_short | Industry involvement in evidence production for genomic medicine: A bibliometric and funding analysis of decision impact studies |
title_sort | industry involvement in evidence production for genomic medicine: a bibliometric and funding analysis of decision impact studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37104298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkergillian industryinvolvementinevidenceproductionforgenomicmedicineabibliometricandfundinganalysisofdecisionimpactstudies AT huntersarah industryinvolvementinevidenceproductionforgenomicmedicineabibliometricandfundinganalysisofdecisionimpactstudies AT hogarthstuart industryinvolvementinevidenceproductionforgenomicmedicineabibliometricandfundinganalysisofdecisionimpactstudies AT millerfionaa industryinvolvementinevidenceproductionforgenomicmedicineabibliometricandfundinganalysisofdecisionimpactstudies |