Cargando…

Disinfection trials with terbinafine‐susceptible and terbinafine‐resistant dermatophytes

BACKGROUND: Treatment of tinea pedis and onychomycosis is complicated by high rates of reinfection and the emergence of terbinafine‐resistant strains of Trichophyton spp. Effective disinfection of contaminated socks is an important measure. Appropriate washing reduces the risk of reinfection and is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skaastrup, Kristoffer Nagy, Astvad, Karen Marie Thyssen, Arendrup, Maiken Cavling, Jemec, Gregor Borut Ernst, Saunte, Ditte Marie Lindhardt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35535729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/myc.13468
_version_ 1785032776060239872
author Skaastrup, Kristoffer Nagy
Astvad, Karen Marie Thyssen
Arendrup, Maiken Cavling
Jemec, Gregor Borut Ernst
Saunte, Ditte Marie Lindhardt
author_facet Skaastrup, Kristoffer Nagy
Astvad, Karen Marie Thyssen
Arendrup, Maiken Cavling
Jemec, Gregor Borut Ernst
Saunte, Ditte Marie Lindhardt
author_sort Skaastrup, Kristoffer Nagy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment of tinea pedis and onychomycosis is complicated by high rates of reinfection and the emergence of terbinafine‐resistant strains of Trichophyton spp. Effective disinfection of contaminated socks is an important measure. Appropriate washing reduces the risk of reinfection and is paramount in treating tinea pedis and onychomycosis. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the effect of commonplace disinfection methods using socks pieces inoculated with terbinafine‐resistant or terbinafine‐susceptible isolates of Trichophyton spp. METHODS: Sock pieces were inoculated with seven terbinafine‐resistant isolates of Trichophyton spp. with known mutations in the SQLE‐gene (T. rubrum (n = 3), T. interdigitale (n = 1) and T. indotineae (n = 3)) and six terbinafine‐susceptible isolates of Trichophyton spp. (T. rubrum (n = 3) and T. interdigitale (n = 3)). Methods of disinfection included soaking in a quaternary ammonium (QAC) detergent (0.5, 2 and 24 h), freezing at −20°C (0.5, 12 and 24 h), domestic and steam washing (both at 40°C with detergent). Sock pieces were cultured for 4 weeks following disinfection. The primary end point was no growth at the end of week 4. RESULTS: Soaking in a QAC‐detergent for 24 h procured at disinfectant rate of 100% (13/13), whilst soaking in 0.5 and 2 h had a disinfectant rate of 46.2% (6/13) and 84.6% (11/13), respectively. Domestic washing (40°C with detergent) produced a disinfectant rate of 7.7% (1/13). Freezing at −20°C (0.5, 12 and 24 h) and steam washing (40°C with detergent) had no disinfectant properties. CONCLUSIONS: Soaking in a QAC‐detergent for 24 h effectively disinfected sock pieces contaminated with dermatophytes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10138727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101387272023-04-28 Disinfection trials with terbinafine‐susceptible and terbinafine‐resistant dermatophytes Skaastrup, Kristoffer Nagy Astvad, Karen Marie Thyssen Arendrup, Maiken Cavling Jemec, Gregor Borut Ernst Saunte, Ditte Marie Lindhardt Mycoses Original Articles BACKGROUND: Treatment of tinea pedis and onychomycosis is complicated by high rates of reinfection and the emergence of terbinafine‐resistant strains of Trichophyton spp. Effective disinfection of contaminated socks is an important measure. Appropriate washing reduces the risk of reinfection and is paramount in treating tinea pedis and onychomycosis. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the effect of commonplace disinfection methods using socks pieces inoculated with terbinafine‐resistant or terbinafine‐susceptible isolates of Trichophyton spp. METHODS: Sock pieces were inoculated with seven terbinafine‐resistant isolates of Trichophyton spp. with known mutations in the SQLE‐gene (T. rubrum (n = 3), T. interdigitale (n = 1) and T. indotineae (n = 3)) and six terbinafine‐susceptible isolates of Trichophyton spp. (T. rubrum (n = 3) and T. interdigitale (n = 3)). Methods of disinfection included soaking in a quaternary ammonium (QAC) detergent (0.5, 2 and 24 h), freezing at −20°C (0.5, 12 and 24 h), domestic and steam washing (both at 40°C with detergent). Sock pieces were cultured for 4 weeks following disinfection. The primary end point was no growth at the end of week 4. RESULTS: Soaking in a QAC‐detergent for 24 h procured at disinfectant rate of 100% (13/13), whilst soaking in 0.5 and 2 h had a disinfectant rate of 46.2% (6/13) and 84.6% (11/13), respectively. Domestic washing (40°C with detergent) produced a disinfectant rate of 7.7% (1/13). Freezing at −20°C (0.5, 12 and 24 h) and steam washing (40°C with detergent) had no disinfectant properties. CONCLUSIONS: Soaking in a QAC‐detergent for 24 h effectively disinfected sock pieces contaminated with dermatophytes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-19 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10138727/ /pubmed/35535729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/myc.13468 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Mycoses published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Skaastrup, Kristoffer Nagy
Astvad, Karen Marie Thyssen
Arendrup, Maiken Cavling
Jemec, Gregor Borut Ernst
Saunte, Ditte Marie Lindhardt
Disinfection trials with terbinafine‐susceptible and terbinafine‐resistant dermatophytes
title Disinfection trials with terbinafine‐susceptible and terbinafine‐resistant dermatophytes
title_full Disinfection trials with terbinafine‐susceptible and terbinafine‐resistant dermatophytes
title_fullStr Disinfection trials with terbinafine‐susceptible and terbinafine‐resistant dermatophytes
title_full_unstemmed Disinfection trials with terbinafine‐susceptible and terbinafine‐resistant dermatophytes
title_short Disinfection trials with terbinafine‐susceptible and terbinafine‐resistant dermatophytes
title_sort disinfection trials with terbinafine‐susceptible and terbinafine‐resistant dermatophytes
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35535729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/myc.13468
work_keys_str_mv AT skaastrupkristoffernagy disinfectiontrialswithterbinafinesusceptibleandterbinafineresistantdermatophytes
AT astvadkarenmariethyssen disinfectiontrialswithterbinafinesusceptibleandterbinafineresistantdermatophytes
AT arendrupmaikencavling disinfectiontrialswithterbinafinesusceptibleandterbinafineresistantdermatophytes
AT jemecgregorboruternst disinfectiontrialswithterbinafinesusceptibleandterbinafineresistantdermatophytes
AT sauntedittemarielindhardt disinfectiontrialswithterbinafinesusceptibleandterbinafineresistantdermatophytes