Cargando…

Genomic analysis of 10 years of artificial selection in community‐based breeding programs in two Ethiopian indigenous sheep breeds

In recent times, community‐based breeding programs (CBBPs) have been advocated as the best strategy for genetic improvement of local breeds in smallholder farms in developing countries. Since 2009, CBBPs have been implemented for Ethiopian Bonga and Menz sheep to improve growth rates resulting in si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rekik, Emna, Ahbara, Abulgasim M., Abate, Zelalem, Goshme, Shenkute, Getachew, Tesfaye, Haile, Aynalem, Rischkowsky, Barbara, Mwacharo, Joram M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/age.13190
_version_ 1785032779673632768
author Rekik, Emna
Ahbara, Abulgasim M.
Abate, Zelalem
Goshme, Shenkute
Getachew, Tesfaye
Haile, Aynalem
Rischkowsky, Barbara
Mwacharo, Joram M.
author_facet Rekik, Emna
Ahbara, Abulgasim M.
Abate, Zelalem
Goshme, Shenkute
Getachew, Tesfaye
Haile, Aynalem
Rischkowsky, Barbara
Mwacharo, Joram M.
author_sort Rekik, Emna
collection PubMed
description In recent times, community‐based breeding programs (CBBPs) have been advocated as the best strategy for genetic improvement of local breeds in smallholder farms in developing countries. Since 2009, CBBPs have been implemented for Ethiopian Bonga and Menz sheep to improve growth rates resulting in significant genetic gains in 6‐month weights. With the hypothesis that selection could be impacting their genomes, we systematically screened for possible genome changes in the two breeds by analyzing 600K BeadChip genotype data of 151 individuals (with the highest breeding values for 6‐month weights) from CBBP flocks against 98 individuals from non‐CBBP flocks. We observed no differences in genetic diversity and demographic dynamics between CBBP and non‐CBBP flocks. Selection signature analysis employing ROH, logistic regression genome‐wide association study , F (ST), XP‐EHH and iHS revealed 5 (Bonga) and 11 (Menz) overlapping regions under selection, that co‐localized with QTLs for production (body size/weight, growth, milk yield), meat/milk quality, and health/parasite resistance, suggesting that the decade‐long selection has likely started to impact their genomes. However, genome‐wide genetic differentiation between the CBBP and non‐CBBP flocks is not yet clearly evident.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10138745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101387452023-04-28 Genomic analysis of 10 years of artificial selection in community‐based breeding programs in two Ethiopian indigenous sheep breeds Rekik, Emna Ahbara, Abulgasim M. Abate, Zelalem Goshme, Shenkute Getachew, Tesfaye Haile, Aynalem Rischkowsky, Barbara Mwacharo, Joram M. Anim Genet Short Communications In recent times, community‐based breeding programs (CBBPs) have been advocated as the best strategy for genetic improvement of local breeds in smallholder farms in developing countries. Since 2009, CBBPs have been implemented for Ethiopian Bonga and Menz sheep to improve growth rates resulting in significant genetic gains in 6‐month weights. With the hypothesis that selection could be impacting their genomes, we systematically screened for possible genome changes in the two breeds by analyzing 600K BeadChip genotype data of 151 individuals (with the highest breeding values for 6‐month weights) from CBBP flocks against 98 individuals from non‐CBBP flocks. We observed no differences in genetic diversity and demographic dynamics between CBBP and non‐CBBP flocks. Selection signature analysis employing ROH, logistic regression genome‐wide association study , F (ST), XP‐EHH and iHS revealed 5 (Bonga) and 11 (Menz) overlapping regions under selection, that co‐localized with QTLs for production (body size/weight, growth, milk yield), meat/milk quality, and health/parasite resistance, suggesting that the decade‐long selection has likely started to impact their genomes. However, genome‐wide genetic differentiation between the CBBP and non‐CBBP flocks is not yet clearly evident. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-15 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10138745/ /pubmed/35428998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/age.13190 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Animal Genetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communications
Rekik, Emna
Ahbara, Abulgasim M.
Abate, Zelalem
Goshme, Shenkute
Getachew, Tesfaye
Haile, Aynalem
Rischkowsky, Barbara
Mwacharo, Joram M.
Genomic analysis of 10 years of artificial selection in community‐based breeding programs in two Ethiopian indigenous sheep breeds
title Genomic analysis of 10 years of artificial selection in community‐based breeding programs in two Ethiopian indigenous sheep breeds
title_full Genomic analysis of 10 years of artificial selection in community‐based breeding programs in two Ethiopian indigenous sheep breeds
title_fullStr Genomic analysis of 10 years of artificial selection in community‐based breeding programs in two Ethiopian indigenous sheep breeds
title_full_unstemmed Genomic analysis of 10 years of artificial selection in community‐based breeding programs in two Ethiopian indigenous sheep breeds
title_short Genomic analysis of 10 years of artificial selection in community‐based breeding programs in two Ethiopian indigenous sheep breeds
title_sort genomic analysis of 10 years of artificial selection in community‐based breeding programs in two ethiopian indigenous sheep breeds
topic Short Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/age.13190
work_keys_str_mv AT rekikemna genomicanalysisof10yearsofartificialselectionincommunitybasedbreedingprogramsintwoethiopianindigenoussheepbreeds
AT ahbaraabulgasimm genomicanalysisof10yearsofartificialselectionincommunitybasedbreedingprogramsintwoethiopianindigenoussheepbreeds
AT abatezelalem genomicanalysisof10yearsofartificialselectionincommunitybasedbreedingprogramsintwoethiopianindigenoussheepbreeds
AT goshmeshenkute genomicanalysisof10yearsofartificialselectionincommunitybasedbreedingprogramsintwoethiopianindigenoussheepbreeds
AT getachewtesfaye genomicanalysisof10yearsofartificialselectionincommunitybasedbreedingprogramsintwoethiopianindigenoussheepbreeds
AT haileaynalem genomicanalysisof10yearsofartificialselectionincommunitybasedbreedingprogramsintwoethiopianindigenoussheepbreeds
AT rischkowskybarbara genomicanalysisof10yearsofartificialselectionincommunitybasedbreedingprogramsintwoethiopianindigenoussheepbreeds
AT mwacharojoramm genomicanalysisof10yearsofartificialselectionincommunitybasedbreedingprogramsintwoethiopianindigenoussheepbreeds