Cargando…

Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review

BACKGROUND: Innovative surgical procedures and devices are often modified throughout their development and introduction into clinical practice. A systematic approach to reporting modifications may support shared learning and foster safe and transparent innovation. Definitions of ‘modifications’, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hossaini, Sina, Hoffmann, Christin, Cousins, Sian, Blencowe, Natalie, McNair, Angus G K, Blazeby, Jane M, Avery, Kerry N L, Potter, Shelley, Macefield, Rhiannon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10139440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37104755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad020
_version_ 1785032949239906304
author Hossaini, Sina
Hoffmann, Christin
Cousins, Sian
Blencowe, Natalie
McNair, Angus G K
Blazeby, Jane M
Avery, Kerry N L
Potter, Shelley
Macefield, Rhiannon
author_facet Hossaini, Sina
Hoffmann, Christin
Cousins, Sian
Blencowe, Natalie
McNair, Angus G K
Blazeby, Jane M
Avery, Kerry N L
Potter, Shelley
Macefield, Rhiannon
author_sort Hossaini, Sina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Innovative surgical procedures and devices are often modified throughout their development and introduction into clinical practice. A systematic approach to reporting modifications may support shared learning and foster safe and transparent innovation. Definitions of ‘modifications’, and how they are conceptualized and classified so they can be reported and shared effectively, however, are lacking. This study aimed to explore and summarize existing definitions, perceptions, classifications and views on modification reporting to develop a conceptual framework for understanding and reporting modifications. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Targeted searches and two database searches were performed to identify relevant opinion pieces and review articles. Included were articles relating to modifications to surgical procedures/devices. Data regarding definitions, perceptions and classifications of modifications, and views on modification reporting were extracted verbatim. Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify themes, which informed development of the conceptual framework. RESULTS: Forty-nine articles were included. Eight articles included systems for classifying modifications, but no articles reported an explicit definition of modifications. Some 13 themes relating to perception of modifications were identified. The derived conceptual framework comprises three overarching components: baseline data about modifications, details about modifications and impact/consequences of modifications. CONCLUSION: A conceptual framework for understanding and reporting modifications that occur during surgical innovation has been developed. This is a first necessary step to support consistent and transparent reporting of modifications, to facilitate shared learning and incremental innovation of surgical procedures/devices. Testing and operationalization is now needed to realize the value of this framework.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10139440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101394402023-04-28 Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review Hossaini, Sina Hoffmann, Christin Cousins, Sian Blencowe, Natalie McNair, Angus G K Blazeby, Jane M Avery, Kerry N L Potter, Shelley Macefield, Rhiannon BJS Open Review BACKGROUND: Innovative surgical procedures and devices are often modified throughout their development and introduction into clinical practice. A systematic approach to reporting modifications may support shared learning and foster safe and transparent innovation. Definitions of ‘modifications’, and how they are conceptualized and classified so they can be reported and shared effectively, however, are lacking. This study aimed to explore and summarize existing definitions, perceptions, classifications and views on modification reporting to develop a conceptual framework for understanding and reporting modifications. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Targeted searches and two database searches were performed to identify relevant opinion pieces and review articles. Included were articles relating to modifications to surgical procedures/devices. Data regarding definitions, perceptions and classifications of modifications, and views on modification reporting were extracted verbatim. Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify themes, which informed development of the conceptual framework. RESULTS: Forty-nine articles were included. Eight articles included systems for classifying modifications, but no articles reported an explicit definition of modifications. Some 13 themes relating to perception of modifications were identified. The derived conceptual framework comprises three overarching components: baseline data about modifications, details about modifications and impact/consequences of modifications. CONCLUSION: A conceptual framework for understanding and reporting modifications that occur during surgical innovation has been developed. This is a first necessary step to support consistent and transparent reporting of modifications, to facilitate shared learning and incremental innovation of surgical procedures/devices. Testing and operationalization is now needed to realize the value of this framework. Oxford University Press 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10139440/ /pubmed/37104755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad020 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Hossaini, Sina
Hoffmann, Christin
Cousins, Sian
Blencowe, Natalie
McNair, Angus G K
Blazeby, Jane M
Avery, Kerry N L
Potter, Shelley
Macefield, Rhiannon
Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review
title Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review
title_full Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review
title_fullStr Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review
title_short Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review
title_sort development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10139440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37104755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad020
work_keys_str_mv AT hossainisina developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview
AT hoffmannchristin developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview
AT cousinssian developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview
AT blencowenatalie developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview
AT mcnairangusgk developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview
AT blazebyjanem developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview
AT averykerrynl developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview
AT pottershelley developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview
AT macefieldrhiannon developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview