Cargando…
Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review
BACKGROUND: Innovative surgical procedures and devices are often modified throughout their development and introduction into clinical practice. A systematic approach to reporting modifications may support shared learning and foster safe and transparent innovation. Definitions of ‘modifications’, and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10139440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37104755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad020 |
_version_ | 1785032949239906304 |
---|---|
author | Hossaini, Sina Hoffmann, Christin Cousins, Sian Blencowe, Natalie McNair, Angus G K Blazeby, Jane M Avery, Kerry N L Potter, Shelley Macefield, Rhiannon |
author_facet | Hossaini, Sina Hoffmann, Christin Cousins, Sian Blencowe, Natalie McNair, Angus G K Blazeby, Jane M Avery, Kerry N L Potter, Shelley Macefield, Rhiannon |
author_sort | Hossaini, Sina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Innovative surgical procedures and devices are often modified throughout their development and introduction into clinical practice. A systematic approach to reporting modifications may support shared learning and foster safe and transparent innovation. Definitions of ‘modifications’, and how they are conceptualized and classified so they can be reported and shared effectively, however, are lacking. This study aimed to explore and summarize existing definitions, perceptions, classifications and views on modification reporting to develop a conceptual framework for understanding and reporting modifications. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Targeted searches and two database searches were performed to identify relevant opinion pieces and review articles. Included were articles relating to modifications to surgical procedures/devices. Data regarding definitions, perceptions and classifications of modifications, and views on modification reporting were extracted verbatim. Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify themes, which informed development of the conceptual framework. RESULTS: Forty-nine articles were included. Eight articles included systems for classifying modifications, but no articles reported an explicit definition of modifications. Some 13 themes relating to perception of modifications were identified. The derived conceptual framework comprises three overarching components: baseline data about modifications, details about modifications and impact/consequences of modifications. CONCLUSION: A conceptual framework for understanding and reporting modifications that occur during surgical innovation has been developed. This is a first necessary step to support consistent and transparent reporting of modifications, to facilitate shared learning and incremental innovation of surgical procedures/devices. Testing and operationalization is now needed to realize the value of this framework. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10139440 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101394402023-04-28 Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review Hossaini, Sina Hoffmann, Christin Cousins, Sian Blencowe, Natalie McNair, Angus G K Blazeby, Jane M Avery, Kerry N L Potter, Shelley Macefield, Rhiannon BJS Open Review BACKGROUND: Innovative surgical procedures and devices are often modified throughout their development and introduction into clinical practice. A systematic approach to reporting modifications may support shared learning and foster safe and transparent innovation. Definitions of ‘modifications’, and how they are conceptualized and classified so they can be reported and shared effectively, however, are lacking. This study aimed to explore and summarize existing definitions, perceptions, classifications and views on modification reporting to develop a conceptual framework for understanding and reporting modifications. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Targeted searches and two database searches were performed to identify relevant opinion pieces and review articles. Included were articles relating to modifications to surgical procedures/devices. Data regarding definitions, perceptions and classifications of modifications, and views on modification reporting were extracted verbatim. Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify themes, which informed development of the conceptual framework. RESULTS: Forty-nine articles were included. Eight articles included systems for classifying modifications, but no articles reported an explicit definition of modifications. Some 13 themes relating to perception of modifications were identified. The derived conceptual framework comprises three overarching components: baseline data about modifications, details about modifications and impact/consequences of modifications. CONCLUSION: A conceptual framework for understanding and reporting modifications that occur during surgical innovation has been developed. This is a first necessary step to support consistent and transparent reporting of modifications, to facilitate shared learning and incremental innovation of surgical procedures/devices. Testing and operationalization is now needed to realize the value of this framework. Oxford University Press 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10139440/ /pubmed/37104755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad020 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Hossaini, Sina Hoffmann, Christin Cousins, Sian Blencowe, Natalie McNair, Angus G K Blazeby, Jane M Avery, Kerry N L Potter, Shelley Macefield, Rhiannon Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review |
title | Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review |
title_full | Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review |
title_fullStr | Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review |
title_short | Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review |
title_sort | development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10139440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37104755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hossainisina developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview AT hoffmannchristin developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview AT cousinssian developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview AT blencowenatalie developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview AT mcnairangusgk developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview AT blazebyjanem developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview AT averykerrynl developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview AT pottershelley developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview AT macefieldrhiannon developmentofaconceptualframeworkforreportingmodificationsinsurgicalinnovationscopingreview |