Cargando…

Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation

PURPOSE: Various radiation therapy (RT) dose/fractionation schedules are acceptable for palliation in multiple myeloma. Nine years of single-institution RT experience were reviewed to determine the influence of dose/fractionation and other factors pertinent to individualizing therapy. METHODS AND MA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meredith, Ruby F., Bassler, John R., McDonald, Andrew M., Stahl, John M., Redden, David T., Bonner, James A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10139858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101214
_version_ 1785033038537687040
author Meredith, Ruby F.
Bassler, John R.
McDonald, Andrew M.
Stahl, John M.
Redden, David T.
Bonner, James A.
author_facet Meredith, Ruby F.
Bassler, John R.
McDonald, Andrew M.
Stahl, John M.
Redden, David T.
Bonner, James A.
author_sort Meredith, Ruby F.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Various radiation therapy (RT) dose/fractionation schedules are acceptable for palliation in multiple myeloma. Nine years of single-institution RT experience were reviewed to determine the influence of dose/fractionation and other factors pertinent to individualizing therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In total, 152 items were identified from Current Procedural Terminology codes for multiple myeloma treatment from 2012 through June 30, 2021. After exclusions, 205 sites of radiation in 94 patients were reviewed. Data were captured from treatment planning and clinical records. To statistically assess the association between biological effective dose (BED(10)) and variables of interest, BED was first dichotomized to <24 Gy versus ≥24 Gy. Multivariate analysis used SAS software and a generalized estimating equation approach to account for multiple observations per patient. RESULTS: Fractions of 1.8 to 8 Gy were used in 1 to 25 fractions. Most patients had no significant toxicity. Grade 1 toxicity was more likely with greater BED radiation courses, as expected (20% vs 12% for BED <24 Gy). Pain relief was complete or very good for most sites, with <3% reporting no pain relief. Eleven sites in 9 patients required retreatment. All retreatment sites had palliation that was lasting, with a median of 22 months to last follow-up or death after repeat course (range, 0.5-106 months). There was a trend for better pain control and less risk of fracture retreatment with BED ≥24 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients had good palliation without toxicity. BED ≥24 Gy caused 8% greater risk of grade 1 toxicity and trended toward better pain control plus reduced risk of fracture retreatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10139858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101398582023-04-29 Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation Meredith, Ruby F. Bassler, John R. McDonald, Andrew M. Stahl, John M. Redden, David T. Bonner, James A. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Various radiation therapy (RT) dose/fractionation schedules are acceptable for palliation in multiple myeloma. Nine years of single-institution RT experience were reviewed to determine the influence of dose/fractionation and other factors pertinent to individualizing therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In total, 152 items were identified from Current Procedural Terminology codes for multiple myeloma treatment from 2012 through June 30, 2021. After exclusions, 205 sites of radiation in 94 patients were reviewed. Data were captured from treatment planning and clinical records. To statistically assess the association between biological effective dose (BED(10)) and variables of interest, BED was first dichotomized to <24 Gy versus ≥24 Gy. Multivariate analysis used SAS software and a generalized estimating equation approach to account for multiple observations per patient. RESULTS: Fractions of 1.8 to 8 Gy were used in 1 to 25 fractions. Most patients had no significant toxicity. Grade 1 toxicity was more likely with greater BED radiation courses, as expected (20% vs 12% for BED <24 Gy). Pain relief was complete or very good for most sites, with <3% reporting no pain relief. Eleven sites in 9 patients required retreatment. All retreatment sites had palliation that was lasting, with a median of 22 months to last follow-up or death after repeat course (range, 0.5-106 months). There was a trend for better pain control and less risk of fracture retreatment with BED ≥24 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients had good palliation without toxicity. BED ≥24 Gy caused 8% greater risk of grade 1 toxicity and trended toward better pain control plus reduced risk of fracture retreatment. Elsevier 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10139858/ /pubmed/37124314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101214 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Meredith, Ruby F.
Bassler, John R.
McDonald, Andrew M.
Stahl, John M.
Redden, David T.
Bonner, James A.
Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation
title Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation
title_full Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation
title_fullStr Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation
title_full_unstemmed Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation
title_short Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation
title_sort biological effective radiation dose for multiple myeloma palliation
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10139858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101214
work_keys_str_mv AT meredithrubyf biologicaleffectiveradiationdoseformultiplemyelomapalliation
AT basslerjohnr biologicaleffectiveradiationdoseformultiplemyelomapalliation
AT mcdonaldandrewm biologicaleffectiveradiationdoseformultiplemyelomapalliation
AT stahljohnm biologicaleffectiveradiationdoseformultiplemyelomapalliation
AT reddendavidt biologicaleffectiveradiationdoseformultiplemyelomapalliation
AT bonnerjamesa biologicaleffectiveradiationdoseformultiplemyelomapalliation