Cargando…
Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation
PURPOSE: Various radiation therapy (RT) dose/fractionation schedules are acceptable for palliation in multiple myeloma. Nine years of single-institution RT experience were reviewed to determine the influence of dose/fractionation and other factors pertinent to individualizing therapy. METHODS AND MA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10139858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101214 |
_version_ | 1785033038537687040 |
---|---|
author | Meredith, Ruby F. Bassler, John R. McDonald, Andrew M. Stahl, John M. Redden, David T. Bonner, James A. |
author_facet | Meredith, Ruby F. Bassler, John R. McDonald, Andrew M. Stahl, John M. Redden, David T. Bonner, James A. |
author_sort | Meredith, Ruby F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Various radiation therapy (RT) dose/fractionation schedules are acceptable for palliation in multiple myeloma. Nine years of single-institution RT experience were reviewed to determine the influence of dose/fractionation and other factors pertinent to individualizing therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In total, 152 items were identified from Current Procedural Terminology codes for multiple myeloma treatment from 2012 through June 30, 2021. After exclusions, 205 sites of radiation in 94 patients were reviewed. Data were captured from treatment planning and clinical records. To statistically assess the association between biological effective dose (BED(10)) and variables of interest, BED was first dichotomized to <24 Gy versus ≥24 Gy. Multivariate analysis used SAS software and a generalized estimating equation approach to account for multiple observations per patient. RESULTS: Fractions of 1.8 to 8 Gy were used in 1 to 25 fractions. Most patients had no significant toxicity. Grade 1 toxicity was more likely with greater BED radiation courses, as expected (20% vs 12% for BED <24 Gy). Pain relief was complete or very good for most sites, with <3% reporting no pain relief. Eleven sites in 9 patients required retreatment. All retreatment sites had palliation that was lasting, with a median of 22 months to last follow-up or death after repeat course (range, 0.5-106 months). There was a trend for better pain control and less risk of fracture retreatment with BED ≥24 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients had good palliation without toxicity. BED ≥24 Gy caused 8% greater risk of grade 1 toxicity and trended toward better pain control plus reduced risk of fracture retreatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10139858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101398582023-04-29 Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation Meredith, Ruby F. Bassler, John R. McDonald, Andrew M. Stahl, John M. Redden, David T. Bonner, James A. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Various radiation therapy (RT) dose/fractionation schedules are acceptable for palliation in multiple myeloma. Nine years of single-institution RT experience were reviewed to determine the influence of dose/fractionation and other factors pertinent to individualizing therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In total, 152 items were identified from Current Procedural Terminology codes for multiple myeloma treatment from 2012 through June 30, 2021. After exclusions, 205 sites of radiation in 94 patients were reviewed. Data were captured from treatment planning and clinical records. To statistically assess the association between biological effective dose (BED(10)) and variables of interest, BED was first dichotomized to <24 Gy versus ≥24 Gy. Multivariate analysis used SAS software and a generalized estimating equation approach to account for multiple observations per patient. RESULTS: Fractions of 1.8 to 8 Gy were used in 1 to 25 fractions. Most patients had no significant toxicity. Grade 1 toxicity was more likely with greater BED radiation courses, as expected (20% vs 12% for BED <24 Gy). Pain relief was complete or very good for most sites, with <3% reporting no pain relief. Eleven sites in 9 patients required retreatment. All retreatment sites had palliation that was lasting, with a median of 22 months to last follow-up or death after repeat course (range, 0.5-106 months). There was a trend for better pain control and less risk of fracture retreatment with BED ≥24 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients had good palliation without toxicity. BED ≥24 Gy caused 8% greater risk of grade 1 toxicity and trended toward better pain control plus reduced risk of fracture retreatment. Elsevier 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10139858/ /pubmed/37124314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101214 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Meredith, Ruby F. Bassler, John R. McDonald, Andrew M. Stahl, John M. Redden, David T. Bonner, James A. Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation |
title | Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation |
title_full | Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation |
title_fullStr | Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation |
title_full_unstemmed | Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation |
title_short | Biological Effective Radiation Dose for Multiple Myeloma Palliation |
title_sort | biological effective radiation dose for multiple myeloma palliation |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10139858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37124314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101214 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meredithrubyf biologicaleffectiveradiationdoseformultiplemyelomapalliation AT basslerjohnr biologicaleffectiveradiationdoseformultiplemyelomapalliation AT mcdonaldandrewm biologicaleffectiveradiationdoseformultiplemyelomapalliation AT stahljohnm biologicaleffectiveradiationdoseformultiplemyelomapalliation AT reddendavidt biologicaleffectiveradiationdoseformultiplemyelomapalliation AT bonnerjamesa biologicaleffectiveradiationdoseformultiplemyelomapalliation |