Cargando…

Mixed methods evaluation of the inaugural year of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network’s (CPCRN) scholars program

PURPOSE: A diverse workforce trained in dissemination & implementation (D&I) science is critical for improving cancer outcomes and reducing cancer-related health disparities. This study aims to describe and evaluate impact of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) Scholar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Escoffery, Cam, Petagna, Courtney N., Wangen, Mary, Flicker, Kimberly J., Noblet, Samuel B., Sakhuja, Mayank, Thomson, Cynthia A., Morrato, Elaine H., Adams, Swann, Leeman, Jennifer, Friedman, Daniela B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10139907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01702-1
_version_ 1785145843710427136
author Escoffery, Cam
Petagna, Courtney N.
Wangen, Mary
Flicker, Kimberly J.
Noblet, Samuel B.
Sakhuja, Mayank
Thomson, Cynthia A.
Morrato, Elaine H.
Adams, Swann
Leeman, Jennifer
Friedman, Daniela B.
author_facet Escoffery, Cam
Petagna, Courtney N.
Wangen, Mary
Flicker, Kimberly J.
Noblet, Samuel B.
Sakhuja, Mayank
Thomson, Cynthia A.
Morrato, Elaine H.
Adams, Swann
Leeman, Jennifer
Friedman, Daniela B.
author_sort Escoffery, Cam
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: A diverse workforce trained in dissemination & implementation (D&I) science is critical for improving cancer outcomes and reducing cancer-related health disparities. This study aims to describe and evaluate impact of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) Scholars Program in preparing scholars for collaborative careers in cancer control and implementation research and practice, and offers evaluation-driven recommendations for program improvements. METHODS: The CPCRN Scholars Workgroup conducted a sequential, mixed methods evaluation. We collected baseline and follow-up surveys and invited all 20 scholars and ten mentors to participate in an exit interview. We assessed the experience with the Scholar’s program, ratings of D&I competences, progress on their project, feedback about the curriculum, and understanding of implementation science. RESULTS: Over 86% partially or fully completed their project within 9 months; 78% of scholars engaged with a CPCRN workgroup. Scholars rated the following program components as valuable: the Putting Public Health Evidence in Action (PPHEIA) training (88.9%), D&I training modules (83.3%), and webinars (kickoff webinar-88.9% and selecting theories/models-88.9%). There was an increase in D&I competencies from baseline to posttest, with the greatest in community engagement topics. About 78% reported that they were satisfied with format of the activities and increased confidence in ability to discuss D&I concepts. From the qualitative interviews, the benefit of the program was becoming more knowledgeable about D&I research and networking. CONCLUSION: The inaugural year of the program yielded positive results, particularly related to increasing knowledge about D&I science and cancer control. This program builds the capacity of students, researchers and practitioners in D&I science. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-023-01702-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10139907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101399072023-12-02 Mixed methods evaluation of the inaugural year of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network’s (CPCRN) scholars program Escoffery, Cam Petagna, Courtney N. Wangen, Mary Flicker, Kimberly J. Noblet, Samuel B. Sakhuja, Mayank Thomson, Cynthia A. Morrato, Elaine H. Adams, Swann Leeman, Jennifer Friedman, Daniela B. Cancer Causes Control Original Paper PURPOSE: A diverse workforce trained in dissemination & implementation (D&I) science is critical for improving cancer outcomes and reducing cancer-related health disparities. This study aims to describe and evaluate impact of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) Scholars Program in preparing scholars for collaborative careers in cancer control and implementation research and practice, and offers evaluation-driven recommendations for program improvements. METHODS: The CPCRN Scholars Workgroup conducted a sequential, mixed methods evaluation. We collected baseline and follow-up surveys and invited all 20 scholars and ten mentors to participate in an exit interview. We assessed the experience with the Scholar’s program, ratings of D&I competences, progress on their project, feedback about the curriculum, and understanding of implementation science. RESULTS: Over 86% partially or fully completed their project within 9 months; 78% of scholars engaged with a CPCRN workgroup. Scholars rated the following program components as valuable: the Putting Public Health Evidence in Action (PPHEIA) training (88.9%), D&I training modules (83.3%), and webinars (kickoff webinar-88.9% and selecting theories/models-88.9%). There was an increase in D&I competencies from baseline to posttest, with the greatest in community engagement topics. About 78% reported that they were satisfied with format of the activities and increased confidence in ability to discuss D&I concepts. From the qualitative interviews, the benefit of the program was becoming more knowledgeable about D&I research and networking. CONCLUSION: The inaugural year of the program yielded positive results, particularly related to increasing knowledge about D&I science and cancer control. This program builds the capacity of students, researchers and practitioners in D&I science. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-023-01702-1. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10139907/ /pubmed/37106215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01702-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Escoffery, Cam
Petagna, Courtney N.
Wangen, Mary
Flicker, Kimberly J.
Noblet, Samuel B.
Sakhuja, Mayank
Thomson, Cynthia A.
Morrato, Elaine H.
Adams, Swann
Leeman, Jennifer
Friedman, Daniela B.
Mixed methods evaluation of the inaugural year of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network’s (CPCRN) scholars program
title Mixed methods evaluation of the inaugural year of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network’s (CPCRN) scholars program
title_full Mixed methods evaluation of the inaugural year of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network’s (CPCRN) scholars program
title_fullStr Mixed methods evaluation of the inaugural year of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network’s (CPCRN) scholars program
title_full_unstemmed Mixed methods evaluation of the inaugural year of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network’s (CPCRN) scholars program
title_short Mixed methods evaluation of the inaugural year of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network’s (CPCRN) scholars program
title_sort mixed methods evaluation of the inaugural year of the cancer prevention and control research network’s (cpcrn) scholars program
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10139907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01702-1
work_keys_str_mv AT escofferycam mixedmethodsevaluationoftheinauguralyearofthecancerpreventionandcontrolresearchnetworkscpcrnscholarsprogram
AT petagnacourtneyn mixedmethodsevaluationoftheinauguralyearofthecancerpreventionandcontrolresearchnetworkscpcrnscholarsprogram
AT wangenmary mixedmethodsevaluationoftheinauguralyearofthecancerpreventionandcontrolresearchnetworkscpcrnscholarsprogram
AT flickerkimberlyj mixedmethodsevaluationoftheinauguralyearofthecancerpreventionandcontrolresearchnetworkscpcrnscholarsprogram
AT nobletsamuelb mixedmethodsevaluationoftheinauguralyearofthecancerpreventionandcontrolresearchnetworkscpcrnscholarsprogram
AT sakhujamayank mixedmethodsevaluationoftheinauguralyearofthecancerpreventionandcontrolresearchnetworkscpcrnscholarsprogram
AT thomsoncynthiaa mixedmethodsevaluationoftheinauguralyearofthecancerpreventionandcontrolresearchnetworkscpcrnscholarsprogram
AT morratoelaineh mixedmethodsevaluationoftheinauguralyearofthecancerpreventionandcontrolresearchnetworkscpcrnscholarsprogram
AT adamsswann mixedmethodsevaluationoftheinauguralyearofthecancerpreventionandcontrolresearchnetworkscpcrnscholarsprogram
AT leemanjennifer mixedmethodsevaluationoftheinauguralyearofthecancerpreventionandcontrolresearchnetworkscpcrnscholarsprogram
AT friedmandanielab mixedmethodsevaluationoftheinauguralyearofthecancerpreventionandcontrolresearchnetworkscpcrnscholarsprogram