Cargando…

Personalised therapeutic approaches to glioblastoma: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma is the most common and malignant primary brain tumour with median survival of 14.6 months. Personalised medicine aims to improve survival by targeting individualised patient characteristics. However, a major limitation has been application of targeted therapies in a non-pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mowforth, Oliver D., Brannigan, Jamie, El Khoury, Marc, Sarathi, Celine Iswarya Partha, Bestwick, Harry, Bhatti, Faheem, Mair, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10140534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37122327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1166104
_version_ 1785033183066062848
author Mowforth, Oliver D.
Brannigan, Jamie
El Khoury, Marc
Sarathi, Celine Iswarya Partha
Bestwick, Harry
Bhatti, Faheem
Mair, Richard
author_facet Mowforth, Oliver D.
Brannigan, Jamie
El Khoury, Marc
Sarathi, Celine Iswarya Partha
Bestwick, Harry
Bhatti, Faheem
Mair, Richard
author_sort Mowforth, Oliver D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma is the most common and malignant primary brain tumour with median survival of 14.6 months. Personalised medicine aims to improve survival by targeting individualised patient characteristics. However, a major limitation has been application of targeted therapies in a non-personalised manner without biomarker enrichment. This has risked therapies being discounted without fair and rigorous evaluation. The objective was therefore to synthesise the current evidence on survival efficacy of personalised therapies in glioblastoma. METHODS: Studies reporting a survival outcome in human adults with supratentorial glioblastoma were eligible. PRISMA guidelines were followed. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched to 5th May 2022. Clinicaltrials.gov was searched to 25th May 2022. Reference lists were hand-searched. Duplicate title/abstract screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessments were conducted. A quantitative synthesis is presented. RESULTS: A total of 102 trials were included: 16 were randomised and 41 studied newly diagnosed patients. Of 5,527 included patients, 59.4% were male and mean age was 53.7 years. More than 20 types of personalised therapy were included: targeted molecular therapies were the most studied (33.3%, 34/102), followed by autologous dendritic cell vaccines (32.4%, 33/102) and autologous tumour vaccines (10.8%, 11/102). There was no consistent evidence for survival efficacy of any personalised therapy. CONCLUSION: Personalised glioblastoma therapies remain of unproven survival benefit. Evidence is inconsistent with high risk of bias. Nonetheless, encouraging results in some trials provide reason for optimism. Future focus should address target-enriched trials, combination therapies, longitudinal biomarker monitoring and standardised reporting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10140534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101405342023-04-29 Personalised therapeutic approaches to glioblastoma: A systematic review Mowforth, Oliver D. Brannigan, Jamie El Khoury, Marc Sarathi, Celine Iswarya Partha Bestwick, Harry Bhatti, Faheem Mair, Richard Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma is the most common and malignant primary brain tumour with median survival of 14.6 months. Personalised medicine aims to improve survival by targeting individualised patient characteristics. However, a major limitation has been application of targeted therapies in a non-personalised manner without biomarker enrichment. This has risked therapies being discounted without fair and rigorous evaluation. The objective was therefore to synthesise the current evidence on survival efficacy of personalised therapies in glioblastoma. METHODS: Studies reporting a survival outcome in human adults with supratentorial glioblastoma were eligible. PRISMA guidelines were followed. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched to 5th May 2022. Clinicaltrials.gov was searched to 25th May 2022. Reference lists were hand-searched. Duplicate title/abstract screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessments were conducted. A quantitative synthesis is presented. RESULTS: A total of 102 trials were included: 16 were randomised and 41 studied newly diagnosed patients. Of 5,527 included patients, 59.4% were male and mean age was 53.7 years. More than 20 types of personalised therapy were included: targeted molecular therapies were the most studied (33.3%, 34/102), followed by autologous dendritic cell vaccines (32.4%, 33/102) and autologous tumour vaccines (10.8%, 11/102). There was no consistent evidence for survival efficacy of any personalised therapy. CONCLUSION: Personalised glioblastoma therapies remain of unproven survival benefit. Evidence is inconsistent with high risk of bias. Nonetheless, encouraging results in some trials provide reason for optimism. Future focus should address target-enriched trials, combination therapies, longitudinal biomarker monitoring and standardised reporting. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10140534/ /pubmed/37122327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1166104 Text en Copyright © 2023 Mowforth, Brannigan, El Khoury, Sarathi, Bestwick, Bhatti and Mair. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Mowforth, Oliver D.
Brannigan, Jamie
El Khoury, Marc
Sarathi, Celine Iswarya Partha
Bestwick, Harry
Bhatti, Faheem
Mair, Richard
Personalised therapeutic approaches to glioblastoma: A systematic review
title Personalised therapeutic approaches to glioblastoma: A systematic review
title_full Personalised therapeutic approaches to glioblastoma: A systematic review
title_fullStr Personalised therapeutic approaches to glioblastoma: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Personalised therapeutic approaches to glioblastoma: A systematic review
title_short Personalised therapeutic approaches to glioblastoma: A systematic review
title_sort personalised therapeutic approaches to glioblastoma: a systematic review
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10140534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37122327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1166104
work_keys_str_mv AT mowfortholiverd personalisedtherapeuticapproachestoglioblastomaasystematicreview
AT branniganjamie personalisedtherapeuticapproachestoglioblastomaasystematicreview
AT elkhourymarc personalisedtherapeuticapproachestoglioblastomaasystematicreview
AT sarathicelineiswaryapartha personalisedtherapeuticapproachestoglioblastomaasystematicreview
AT bestwickharry personalisedtherapeuticapproachestoglioblastomaasystematicreview
AT bhattifaheem personalisedtherapeuticapproachestoglioblastomaasystematicreview
AT mairrichard personalisedtherapeuticapproachestoglioblastomaasystematicreview