Cargando…
Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Self-adhesive resin cements (SARCs) are used because of their mechanical properties, ease of cementation protocols, and lack of requirements for acid conditioning or adhesive systems. SARCs are generally dual-cured, photoactivated, and self-cured, with a slight increase in acidic pH, allowing self-a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10140979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16082996 |
_version_ | 1785033282598993920 |
---|---|
author | Calheiros-Lobo, Maria João Vieira, Tatiana Carbas, Ricardo da Silva, Lucas F. M. Pinho, Teresa |
author_facet | Calheiros-Lobo, Maria João Vieira, Tatiana Carbas, Ricardo da Silva, Lucas F. M. Pinho, Teresa |
author_sort | Calheiros-Lobo, Maria João |
collection | PubMed |
description | Self-adhesive resin cements (SARCs) are used because of their mechanical properties, ease of cementation protocols, and lack of requirements for acid conditioning or adhesive systems. SARCs are generally dual-cured, photoactivated, and self-cured, with a slight increase in acidic pH, allowing self-adhesiveness and increasing resistance to hydrolysis. This systematic review assessed the adhesive strength of SARC systems luted to different substrates and computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic blocks. The PubMed/MedLine and Science Direct databases were searched using the Boolean formula [((dental or tooth) AND (self-adhesive) AND (luting or cement) AND CAD-CAM) NOT (endodontics or implants)]. Of the 199 articles obtained, 31 were selected for the quality assessment. Lava Ultimate (resin matrix filled with nanoceramic) and Vita Enamic (polymer-infiltrated ceramic) blocks were the most tested. Rely X Unicem 2 was the most tested resin cement, followed by Rely X Unicem > Ultimate > U200, and μTBS was the test most used. The meta-analysis confirmed the substrate-dependent adhesive strength of SARCs, with significant differences between them and between SARCs and conventional resin-based adhesive cement (α < 0.05). SARCs are promising. However, one must be aware of the differences in the adhesive strengths. An appropriate combination of materials must be considered to improve the durability and stability of restorations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10140979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101409792023-04-29 Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Calheiros-Lobo, Maria João Vieira, Tatiana Carbas, Ricardo da Silva, Lucas F. M. Pinho, Teresa Materials (Basel) Systematic Review Self-adhesive resin cements (SARCs) are used because of their mechanical properties, ease of cementation protocols, and lack of requirements for acid conditioning or adhesive systems. SARCs are generally dual-cured, photoactivated, and self-cured, with a slight increase in acidic pH, allowing self-adhesiveness and increasing resistance to hydrolysis. This systematic review assessed the adhesive strength of SARC systems luted to different substrates and computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic blocks. The PubMed/MedLine and Science Direct databases were searched using the Boolean formula [((dental or tooth) AND (self-adhesive) AND (luting or cement) AND CAD-CAM) NOT (endodontics or implants)]. Of the 199 articles obtained, 31 were selected for the quality assessment. Lava Ultimate (resin matrix filled with nanoceramic) and Vita Enamic (polymer-infiltrated ceramic) blocks were the most tested. Rely X Unicem 2 was the most tested resin cement, followed by Rely X Unicem > Ultimate > U200, and μTBS was the test most used. The meta-analysis confirmed the substrate-dependent adhesive strength of SARCs, with significant differences between them and between SARCs and conventional resin-based adhesive cement (α < 0.05). SARCs are promising. However, one must be aware of the differences in the adhesive strengths. An appropriate combination of materials must be considered to improve the durability and stability of restorations. MDPI 2023-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10140979/ /pubmed/37109832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16082996 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Calheiros-Lobo, Maria João Vieira, Tatiana Carbas, Ricardo da Silva, Lucas F. M. Pinho, Teresa Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness of self-adhesive resin luting cement in cad-cam blocks—a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10140979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16082996 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT calheiroslobomariajoao effectivenessofselfadhesiveresinlutingcementincadcamblocksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vieiratatiana effectivenessofselfadhesiveresinlutingcementincadcamblocksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT carbasricardo effectivenessofselfadhesiveresinlutingcementincadcamblocksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dasilvalucasfm effectivenessofselfadhesiveresinlutingcementincadcamblocksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pinhoteresa effectivenessofselfadhesiveresinlutingcementincadcamblocksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |