Cargando…

Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Self-adhesive resin cements (SARCs) are used because of their mechanical properties, ease of cementation protocols, and lack of requirements for acid conditioning or adhesive systems. SARCs are generally dual-cured, photoactivated, and self-cured, with a slight increase in acidic pH, allowing self-a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calheiros-Lobo, Maria João, Vieira, Tatiana, Carbas, Ricardo, da Silva, Lucas F. M., Pinho, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10140979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16082996
_version_ 1785033282598993920
author Calheiros-Lobo, Maria João
Vieira, Tatiana
Carbas, Ricardo
da Silva, Lucas F. M.
Pinho, Teresa
author_facet Calheiros-Lobo, Maria João
Vieira, Tatiana
Carbas, Ricardo
da Silva, Lucas F. M.
Pinho, Teresa
author_sort Calheiros-Lobo, Maria João
collection PubMed
description Self-adhesive resin cements (SARCs) are used because of their mechanical properties, ease of cementation protocols, and lack of requirements for acid conditioning or adhesive systems. SARCs are generally dual-cured, photoactivated, and self-cured, with a slight increase in acidic pH, allowing self-adhesiveness and increasing resistance to hydrolysis. This systematic review assessed the adhesive strength of SARC systems luted to different substrates and computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic blocks. The PubMed/MedLine and Science Direct databases were searched using the Boolean formula [((dental or tooth) AND (self-adhesive) AND (luting or cement) AND CAD-CAM) NOT (endodontics or implants)]. Of the 199 articles obtained, 31 were selected for the quality assessment. Lava Ultimate (resin matrix filled with nanoceramic) and Vita Enamic (polymer-infiltrated ceramic) blocks were the most tested. Rely X Unicem 2 was the most tested resin cement, followed by Rely X Unicem > Ultimate > U200, and μTBS was the test most used. The meta-analysis confirmed the substrate-dependent adhesive strength of SARCs, with significant differences between them and between SARCs and conventional resin-based adhesive cement (α < 0.05). SARCs are promising. However, one must be aware of the differences in the adhesive strengths. An appropriate combination of materials must be considered to improve the durability and stability of restorations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10140979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101409792023-04-29 Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Calheiros-Lobo, Maria João Vieira, Tatiana Carbas, Ricardo da Silva, Lucas F. M. Pinho, Teresa Materials (Basel) Systematic Review Self-adhesive resin cements (SARCs) are used because of their mechanical properties, ease of cementation protocols, and lack of requirements for acid conditioning or adhesive systems. SARCs are generally dual-cured, photoactivated, and self-cured, with a slight increase in acidic pH, allowing self-adhesiveness and increasing resistance to hydrolysis. This systematic review assessed the adhesive strength of SARC systems luted to different substrates and computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic blocks. The PubMed/MedLine and Science Direct databases were searched using the Boolean formula [((dental or tooth) AND (self-adhesive) AND (luting or cement) AND CAD-CAM) NOT (endodontics or implants)]. Of the 199 articles obtained, 31 were selected for the quality assessment. Lava Ultimate (resin matrix filled with nanoceramic) and Vita Enamic (polymer-infiltrated ceramic) blocks were the most tested. Rely X Unicem 2 was the most tested resin cement, followed by Rely X Unicem > Ultimate > U200, and μTBS was the test most used. The meta-analysis confirmed the substrate-dependent adhesive strength of SARCs, with significant differences between them and between SARCs and conventional resin-based adhesive cement (α < 0.05). SARCs are promising. However, one must be aware of the differences in the adhesive strengths. An appropriate combination of materials must be considered to improve the durability and stability of restorations. MDPI 2023-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10140979/ /pubmed/37109832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16082996 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Calheiros-Lobo, Maria João
Vieira, Tatiana
Carbas, Ricardo
da Silva, Lucas F. M.
Pinho, Teresa
Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort effectiveness of self-adhesive resin luting cement in cad-cam blocks—a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10140979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16082996
work_keys_str_mv AT calheiroslobomariajoao effectivenessofselfadhesiveresinlutingcementincadcamblocksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vieiratatiana effectivenessofselfadhesiveresinlutingcementincadcamblocksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carbasricardo effectivenessofselfadhesiveresinlutingcementincadcamblocksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dasilvalucasfm effectivenessofselfadhesiveresinlutingcementincadcamblocksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pinhoteresa effectivenessofselfadhesiveresinlutingcementincadcamblocksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis