Cargando…
Detection of Prosthetic Loosening in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: prosthetic loosening after hip and knee arthroplasty is one of the most common causes of joint arthroplasty failure and revision surgery. Diagnosis of prosthetic loosening is a difficult problem and, in many cases, loosening is not clearly diagnosed until accurately confirmed during surg...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109740 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040782 |
_version_ | 1785033293131939840 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Man-Soo Kim, Jae-Jung Kang, Ki-Ho Lee, Jeong-Han In, Yong |
author_facet | Kim, Man-Soo Kim, Jae-Jung Kang, Ki-Ho Lee, Jeong-Han In, Yong |
author_sort | Kim, Man-Soo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: prosthetic loosening after hip and knee arthroplasty is one of the most common causes of joint arthroplasty failure and revision surgery. Diagnosis of prosthetic loosening is a difficult problem and, in many cases, loosening is not clearly diagnosed until accurately confirmed during surgery. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to demonstrate the analysis and performance of machine learning in diagnosing prosthetic loosening after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Materials and Methods: three comprehensive databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were searched for studies that evaluated the detection accuracy of loosening around arthroplasty implants using machine learning. Data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and meta-analysis were performed. Results: five studies were included in the meta-analysis. All studies were retrospective studies. In total, data from 2013 patients with 3236 images were assessed; these data involved 2442 cases (75.5%) with THAs and 794 cases (24.5%) with TKAs. The most common and best-performing machine learning algorithm was DenseNet. In one study, a novel stacking approach using a random forest showed similar performance to DenseNet. The pooled sensitivity across studies was 0.92 (95% CI 0.84–0.97), the pooled specificity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.96), and the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 194.09 (95% CI 61.60–611.57). The I2 statistics for sensitivity and specificity were 96% and 62%, respectively, showing that there was significant heterogeneity. The summary receiver operating characteristics curve indicated the sensitivity and specificity, as did the prediction regions, with an AUC of 0.9853. Conclusions: the performance of machine learning using plain radiography showed promising results with good accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in the detection of loosening around THAs and TKAs. Machine learning can be incorporated into prosthetic loosening screening programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10141023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101410232023-04-29 Detection of Prosthetic Loosening in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Kim, Man-Soo Kim, Jae-Jung Kang, Ki-Ho Lee, Jeong-Han In, Yong Medicina (Kaunas) Review Background: prosthetic loosening after hip and knee arthroplasty is one of the most common causes of joint arthroplasty failure and revision surgery. Diagnosis of prosthetic loosening is a difficult problem and, in many cases, loosening is not clearly diagnosed until accurately confirmed during surgery. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to demonstrate the analysis and performance of machine learning in diagnosing prosthetic loosening after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Materials and Methods: three comprehensive databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were searched for studies that evaluated the detection accuracy of loosening around arthroplasty implants using machine learning. Data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and meta-analysis were performed. Results: five studies were included in the meta-analysis. All studies were retrospective studies. In total, data from 2013 patients with 3236 images were assessed; these data involved 2442 cases (75.5%) with THAs and 794 cases (24.5%) with TKAs. The most common and best-performing machine learning algorithm was DenseNet. In one study, a novel stacking approach using a random forest showed similar performance to DenseNet. The pooled sensitivity across studies was 0.92 (95% CI 0.84–0.97), the pooled specificity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.96), and the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 194.09 (95% CI 61.60–611.57). The I2 statistics for sensitivity and specificity were 96% and 62%, respectively, showing that there was significant heterogeneity. The summary receiver operating characteristics curve indicated the sensitivity and specificity, as did the prediction regions, with an AUC of 0.9853. Conclusions: the performance of machine learning using plain radiography showed promising results with good accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in the detection of loosening around THAs and TKAs. Machine learning can be incorporated into prosthetic loosening screening programs. MDPI 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10141023/ /pubmed/37109740 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040782 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Kim, Man-Soo Kim, Jae-Jung Kang, Ki-Ho Lee, Jeong-Han In, Yong Detection of Prosthetic Loosening in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Detection of Prosthetic Loosening in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Detection of Prosthetic Loosening in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Detection of Prosthetic Loosening in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of Prosthetic Loosening in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Detection of Prosthetic Loosening in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | detection of prosthetic loosening in hip and knee arthroplasty using machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109740 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040782 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimmansoo detectionofprostheticlooseninginhipandkneearthroplastyusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimjaejung detectionofprostheticlooseninginhipandkneearthroplastyusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kangkiho detectionofprostheticlooseninginhipandkneearthroplastyusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leejeonghan detectionofprostheticlooseninginhipandkneearthroplastyusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT inyong detectionofprostheticlooseninginhipandkneearthroplastyusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |