Cargando…
Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses
Accurate and rapid quantification of (infectious) virus titers is of paramount importance in the manufacture of viral vectors and vaccines. Reliable quantification data allow efficient process development at a laboratory scale and thorough process monitoring in later production. However, current gol...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37112978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15040998 |
_version_ | 1785033311562760192 |
---|---|
author | Lothert, Keven Bagrin, Elena Wolff, Michael W. |
author_facet | Lothert, Keven Bagrin, Elena Wolff, Michael W. |
author_sort | Lothert, Keven |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accurate and rapid quantification of (infectious) virus titers is of paramount importance in the manufacture of viral vectors and vaccines. Reliable quantification data allow efficient process development at a laboratory scale and thorough process monitoring in later production. However, current gold standard applications, such as endpoint dilution assays, are cumbersome and do not provide true process analytical monitoring. Accordingly, flow cytometry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction have attracted increasing interest in recent years, offering various advantages for rapid quantification. Here, we compared different approaches for the assessment of infectious viruses, using a model baculovirus. Firstly, infectivity was estimated by the quantification of viral nucleic acids in infected cells, and secondly, different flow cytometric approaches were investigated regarding analysis times and calibration ranges. The flow cytometry technique included a quantification based on post-infection fluorophore expression and labeling of a viral surface protein using fluorescent antibodies. Additionally, the possibility of viral (m)RNA labeling in infected cells was investigated as a proof of concept. The results confirmed that infectivity assessment based on qPCR is not trivial and requires sophisticated method optimization, whereas staining of viral surface proteins is a fast and feasible approach for enveloped viruses. Finally, labeling of viral (m)RNA in infected cells appears to be a promising opportunity but will require further research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10141099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101410992023-04-29 Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses Lothert, Keven Bagrin, Elena Wolff, Michael W. Viruses Article Accurate and rapid quantification of (infectious) virus titers is of paramount importance in the manufacture of viral vectors and vaccines. Reliable quantification data allow efficient process development at a laboratory scale and thorough process monitoring in later production. However, current gold standard applications, such as endpoint dilution assays, are cumbersome and do not provide true process analytical monitoring. Accordingly, flow cytometry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction have attracted increasing interest in recent years, offering various advantages for rapid quantification. Here, we compared different approaches for the assessment of infectious viruses, using a model baculovirus. Firstly, infectivity was estimated by the quantification of viral nucleic acids in infected cells, and secondly, different flow cytometric approaches were investigated regarding analysis times and calibration ranges. The flow cytometry technique included a quantification based on post-infection fluorophore expression and labeling of a viral surface protein using fluorescent antibodies. Additionally, the possibility of viral (m)RNA labeling in infected cells was investigated as a proof of concept. The results confirmed that infectivity assessment based on qPCR is not trivial and requires sophisticated method optimization, whereas staining of viral surface proteins is a fast and feasible approach for enveloped viruses. Finally, labeling of viral (m)RNA in infected cells appears to be a promising opportunity but will require further research. MDPI 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10141099/ /pubmed/37112978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15040998 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lothert, Keven Bagrin, Elena Wolff, Michael W. Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses |
title | Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses |
title_full | Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses |
title_short | Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses |
title_sort | evaluating novel quantification methods for infectious baculoviruses |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37112978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15040998 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lothertkeven evaluatingnovelquantificationmethodsforinfectiousbaculoviruses AT bagrinelena evaluatingnovelquantificationmethodsforinfectiousbaculoviruses AT wolffmichaelw evaluatingnovelquantificationmethodsforinfectiousbaculoviruses |