Cargando…

Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses

Accurate and rapid quantification of (infectious) virus titers is of paramount importance in the manufacture of viral vectors and vaccines. Reliable quantification data allow efficient process development at a laboratory scale and thorough process monitoring in later production. However, current gol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lothert, Keven, Bagrin, Elena, Wolff, Michael W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37112978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15040998
_version_ 1785033311562760192
author Lothert, Keven
Bagrin, Elena
Wolff, Michael W.
author_facet Lothert, Keven
Bagrin, Elena
Wolff, Michael W.
author_sort Lothert, Keven
collection PubMed
description Accurate and rapid quantification of (infectious) virus titers is of paramount importance in the manufacture of viral vectors and vaccines. Reliable quantification data allow efficient process development at a laboratory scale and thorough process monitoring in later production. However, current gold standard applications, such as endpoint dilution assays, are cumbersome and do not provide true process analytical monitoring. Accordingly, flow cytometry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction have attracted increasing interest in recent years, offering various advantages for rapid quantification. Here, we compared different approaches for the assessment of infectious viruses, using a model baculovirus. Firstly, infectivity was estimated by the quantification of viral nucleic acids in infected cells, and secondly, different flow cytometric approaches were investigated regarding analysis times and calibration ranges. The flow cytometry technique included a quantification based on post-infection fluorophore expression and labeling of a viral surface protein using fluorescent antibodies. Additionally, the possibility of viral (m)RNA labeling in infected cells was investigated as a proof of concept. The results confirmed that infectivity assessment based on qPCR is not trivial and requires sophisticated method optimization, whereas staining of viral surface proteins is a fast and feasible approach for enveloped viruses. Finally, labeling of viral (m)RNA in infected cells appears to be a promising opportunity but will require further research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10141099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101410992023-04-29 Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses Lothert, Keven Bagrin, Elena Wolff, Michael W. Viruses Article Accurate and rapid quantification of (infectious) virus titers is of paramount importance in the manufacture of viral vectors and vaccines. Reliable quantification data allow efficient process development at a laboratory scale and thorough process monitoring in later production. However, current gold standard applications, such as endpoint dilution assays, are cumbersome and do not provide true process analytical monitoring. Accordingly, flow cytometry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction have attracted increasing interest in recent years, offering various advantages for rapid quantification. Here, we compared different approaches for the assessment of infectious viruses, using a model baculovirus. Firstly, infectivity was estimated by the quantification of viral nucleic acids in infected cells, and secondly, different flow cytometric approaches were investigated regarding analysis times and calibration ranges. The flow cytometry technique included a quantification based on post-infection fluorophore expression and labeling of a viral surface protein using fluorescent antibodies. Additionally, the possibility of viral (m)RNA labeling in infected cells was investigated as a proof of concept. The results confirmed that infectivity assessment based on qPCR is not trivial and requires sophisticated method optimization, whereas staining of viral surface proteins is a fast and feasible approach for enveloped viruses. Finally, labeling of viral (m)RNA in infected cells appears to be a promising opportunity but will require further research. MDPI 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10141099/ /pubmed/37112978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15040998 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lothert, Keven
Bagrin, Elena
Wolff, Michael W.
Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses
title Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses
title_full Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses
title_fullStr Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses
title_short Evaluating Novel Quantification Methods for Infectious Baculoviruses
title_sort evaluating novel quantification methods for infectious baculoviruses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37112978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15040998
work_keys_str_mv AT lothertkeven evaluatingnovelquantificationmethodsforinfectiousbaculoviruses
AT bagrinelena evaluatingnovelquantificationmethodsforinfectiousbaculoviruses
AT wolffmichaelw evaluatingnovelquantificationmethodsforinfectiousbaculoviruses