Cargando…
Intramolecular Proton Transfer in the Radical Anion of Cytidine Monophosphate Sheds Light on the Sensitivities of Dry vs Wet DNA to Electron Attachment-Induced Damage
[Image: see text] Single-strand breaks (SSBs) induced via electron attachment were previously observed in dry DNA under ultrahigh vacuum (UHV), while hydrated electrons were found not able to induce this DNA damage in an aqueous solution. To explain these findings, crossed electron-molecular beam (C...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37040588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c00591 |
_version_ | 1785033350845562880 |
---|---|
author | Chomicz-Mańka, Lidia Czaja, Anna Falkiewicz, Karina Zdrowowicz, Magdalena Biernacki, Karol Demkowicz, Sebastian Izadi, Farhad Arthur-Baidoo, Eugene Denifl, Stephan Zhu, Zhaoguo Tufekci, Burak Ahmet Harris, Rachel Bowen, Kit H. Rak, Janusz |
author_facet | Chomicz-Mańka, Lidia Czaja, Anna Falkiewicz, Karina Zdrowowicz, Magdalena Biernacki, Karol Demkowicz, Sebastian Izadi, Farhad Arthur-Baidoo, Eugene Denifl, Stephan Zhu, Zhaoguo Tufekci, Burak Ahmet Harris, Rachel Bowen, Kit H. Rak, Janusz |
author_sort | Chomicz-Mańka, Lidia |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Single-strand breaks (SSBs) induced via electron attachment were previously observed in dry DNA under ultrahigh vacuum (UHV), while hydrated electrons were found not able to induce this DNA damage in an aqueous solution. To explain these findings, crossed electron-molecular beam (CEMB) and anion photoelectron spectroscopy (aPES) experiments coupled to density functional theory (DFT) modeling were used to demonstrate the fundamental importance of proton transfer (PT) in radical anions formed via electron attachment. Three molecular systems were investigated: 5′-monophosphate of 2′-deoxycytidine (dCMPH), where PT in the electron adduct is feasible, and two ethylated derivatives, 5′-diethylphosphate and 3′,5′-tetraethyldiphosphate of 2′-deoxycytidine, where PT is blocked due to substitution of labile protons with the ethyl residues. CEMB and aPES experiments confirmed the cleavage of the C3′/C5′–O bond as the main dissociation channel related to electron attachment in the ethylated derivatives. In the case of dCMPH, however, electron attachment (in the aPES experiments) yielded its parent (intact) radical anion, dCMPH(–), suggesting that its dissociation was inhibited. The aPES-measured vertical detachment energy of the dCMPH(–) was found to be 3.27 eV, which agreed with its B3LYP/6-31++G(d,p)-calculated value and implied that electron-induced proton transfer (EIPT) had occurred during electron attachment to the dCMPH model nucleotide. In other words, EIPT, subduing dissociation, appeared to be somewhat protective against SSB. While EIPT is facilitated in solution compared to the dry environment, the above findings are consistent with the stability of DNA against hydrated electron-induced SSB in solution versus free electron-induced SSB formation in dry DNA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10141262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101412622023-04-29 Intramolecular Proton Transfer in the Radical Anion of Cytidine Monophosphate Sheds Light on the Sensitivities of Dry vs Wet DNA to Electron Attachment-Induced Damage Chomicz-Mańka, Lidia Czaja, Anna Falkiewicz, Karina Zdrowowicz, Magdalena Biernacki, Karol Demkowicz, Sebastian Izadi, Farhad Arthur-Baidoo, Eugene Denifl, Stephan Zhu, Zhaoguo Tufekci, Burak Ahmet Harris, Rachel Bowen, Kit H. Rak, Janusz J Am Chem Soc [Image: see text] Single-strand breaks (SSBs) induced via electron attachment were previously observed in dry DNA under ultrahigh vacuum (UHV), while hydrated electrons were found not able to induce this DNA damage in an aqueous solution. To explain these findings, crossed electron-molecular beam (CEMB) and anion photoelectron spectroscopy (aPES) experiments coupled to density functional theory (DFT) modeling were used to demonstrate the fundamental importance of proton transfer (PT) in radical anions formed via electron attachment. Three molecular systems were investigated: 5′-monophosphate of 2′-deoxycytidine (dCMPH), where PT in the electron adduct is feasible, and two ethylated derivatives, 5′-diethylphosphate and 3′,5′-tetraethyldiphosphate of 2′-deoxycytidine, where PT is blocked due to substitution of labile protons with the ethyl residues. CEMB and aPES experiments confirmed the cleavage of the C3′/C5′–O bond as the main dissociation channel related to electron attachment in the ethylated derivatives. In the case of dCMPH, however, electron attachment (in the aPES experiments) yielded its parent (intact) radical anion, dCMPH(–), suggesting that its dissociation was inhibited. The aPES-measured vertical detachment energy of the dCMPH(–) was found to be 3.27 eV, which agreed with its B3LYP/6-31++G(d,p)-calculated value and implied that electron-induced proton transfer (EIPT) had occurred during electron attachment to the dCMPH model nucleotide. In other words, EIPT, subduing dissociation, appeared to be somewhat protective against SSB. While EIPT is facilitated in solution compared to the dry environment, the above findings are consistent with the stability of DNA against hydrated electron-induced SSB in solution versus free electron-induced SSB formation in dry DNA. American Chemical Society 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10141262/ /pubmed/37040588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c00591 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Chomicz-Mańka, Lidia Czaja, Anna Falkiewicz, Karina Zdrowowicz, Magdalena Biernacki, Karol Demkowicz, Sebastian Izadi, Farhad Arthur-Baidoo, Eugene Denifl, Stephan Zhu, Zhaoguo Tufekci, Burak Ahmet Harris, Rachel Bowen, Kit H. Rak, Janusz Intramolecular Proton Transfer in the Radical Anion of Cytidine Monophosphate Sheds Light on the Sensitivities of Dry vs Wet DNA to Electron Attachment-Induced Damage |
title | Intramolecular Proton Transfer in the Radical Anion
of Cytidine Monophosphate Sheds Light on the Sensitivities of Dry
vs Wet DNA to Electron Attachment-Induced Damage |
title_full | Intramolecular Proton Transfer in the Radical Anion
of Cytidine Monophosphate Sheds Light on the Sensitivities of Dry
vs Wet DNA to Electron Attachment-Induced Damage |
title_fullStr | Intramolecular Proton Transfer in the Radical Anion
of Cytidine Monophosphate Sheds Light on the Sensitivities of Dry
vs Wet DNA to Electron Attachment-Induced Damage |
title_full_unstemmed | Intramolecular Proton Transfer in the Radical Anion
of Cytidine Monophosphate Sheds Light on the Sensitivities of Dry
vs Wet DNA to Electron Attachment-Induced Damage |
title_short | Intramolecular Proton Transfer in the Radical Anion
of Cytidine Monophosphate Sheds Light on the Sensitivities of Dry
vs Wet DNA to Electron Attachment-Induced Damage |
title_sort | intramolecular proton transfer in the radical anion
of cytidine monophosphate sheds light on the sensitivities of dry
vs wet dna to electron attachment-induced damage |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37040588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c00591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chomiczmankalidia intramolecularprotontransferintheradicalanionofcytidinemonophosphateshedslightonthesensitivitiesofdryvswetdnatoelectronattachmentinduceddamage AT czajaanna intramolecularprotontransferintheradicalanionofcytidinemonophosphateshedslightonthesensitivitiesofdryvswetdnatoelectronattachmentinduceddamage AT falkiewiczkarina intramolecularprotontransferintheradicalanionofcytidinemonophosphateshedslightonthesensitivitiesofdryvswetdnatoelectronattachmentinduceddamage AT zdrowowiczmagdalena intramolecularprotontransferintheradicalanionofcytidinemonophosphateshedslightonthesensitivitiesofdryvswetdnatoelectronattachmentinduceddamage AT biernackikarol intramolecularprotontransferintheradicalanionofcytidinemonophosphateshedslightonthesensitivitiesofdryvswetdnatoelectronattachmentinduceddamage AT demkowiczsebastian intramolecularprotontransferintheradicalanionofcytidinemonophosphateshedslightonthesensitivitiesofdryvswetdnatoelectronattachmentinduceddamage AT izadifarhad intramolecularprotontransferintheradicalanionofcytidinemonophosphateshedslightonthesensitivitiesofdryvswetdnatoelectronattachmentinduceddamage AT arthurbaidooeugene intramolecularprotontransferintheradicalanionofcytidinemonophosphateshedslightonthesensitivitiesofdryvswetdnatoelectronattachmentinduceddamage AT deniflstephan intramolecularprotontransferintheradicalanionofcytidinemonophosphateshedslightonthesensitivitiesofdryvswetdnatoelectronattachmentinduceddamage AT zhuzhaoguo intramolecularprotontransferintheradicalanionofcytidinemonophosphateshedslightonthesensitivitiesofdryvswetdnatoelectronattachmentinduceddamage AT tufekciburakahmet intramolecularprotontransferintheradicalanionofcytidinemonophosphateshedslightonthesensitivitiesofdryvswetdnatoelectronattachmentinduceddamage AT harrisrachel intramolecularprotontransferintheradicalanionofcytidinemonophosphateshedslightonthesensitivitiesofdryvswetdnatoelectronattachmentinduceddamage AT bowenkith intramolecularprotontransferintheradicalanionofcytidinemonophosphateshedslightonthesensitivitiesofdryvswetdnatoelectronattachmentinduceddamage AT rakjanusz intramolecularprotontransferintheradicalanionofcytidinemonophosphateshedslightonthesensitivitiesofdryvswetdnatoelectronattachmentinduceddamage |