Cargando…

Endplate Trauma During Implant Insertion Affects the Expulsion Risk of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices

Background Anterior cage migration in anterior lumbar interbody fusion is a serious complication. To address this risk, cage designs are now available with integrated screw or blade fixation or specially designed surface geometries with large teeth or ridges. However, the implantation technique itse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kienle, Annette, Graf, Nicolas, Tao, Youping, Heuer, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37123763
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36845
_version_ 1785033364689911808
author Kienle, Annette
Graf, Nicolas
Tao, Youping
Heuer, Frank
author_facet Kienle, Annette
Graf, Nicolas
Tao, Youping
Heuer, Frank
author_sort Kienle, Annette
collection PubMed
description Background Anterior cage migration in anterior lumbar interbody fusion is a serious complication. To address this risk, cage designs are now available with integrated screw or blade fixation or specially designed surface geometries with large teeth or ridges. However, the implantation technique itself has not yet been addressed as a potential risk factor for cage migration. This study aimed to investigate whether a cage that is implantable without gouging the vertebral endplates has improved resistance to anterior migration. Methodology A novel three-piece modular cage was inserted between two vertebral body replacements (polyurethane (PU) foam grade 15 pcf) in two ways. In group 1 (modular), the cage was inserted in a wedge within a wedge fashion according to the manufacturer’s instructions such that damage to the PU foam was minimized. In group 2 (mono-bloc), the modular cage was inserted pre-assembled as a one-piece, mono-bloc device. This insertion method required impaction and increased the potential of gouging the PU surfaces. Then, an axial preload was applied to the PU test blocks to simulate the preload on the spine in vivo and an anteriorly direct expulsion force was applied to the cages. Results The mean expulsion yield load in the test group with modular implantation was 392 ± 19 N compared to 287 ± 16 N in the test group where the mono-bloc implants were inserted and endplate gouging occurred. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Thus, the onset of cage migration occurred at significantly higher loads in the test group with modular insertion without endplate gouging compared to one-piece impaction with gouging taking place. In contrast, the stiffness and the ultimate load were similar in both test groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions This study showed that the cage insertion technique may have a significant effect on the cage migration risk. Prevention of endplate gouging during cage implantation has the potential to improve the primary stability of the cage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10141341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101413412023-04-29 Endplate Trauma During Implant Insertion Affects the Expulsion Risk of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices Kienle, Annette Graf, Nicolas Tao, Youping Heuer, Frank Cureus Neurosurgery Background Anterior cage migration in anterior lumbar interbody fusion is a serious complication. To address this risk, cage designs are now available with integrated screw or blade fixation or specially designed surface geometries with large teeth or ridges. However, the implantation technique itself has not yet been addressed as a potential risk factor for cage migration. This study aimed to investigate whether a cage that is implantable without gouging the vertebral endplates has improved resistance to anterior migration. Methodology A novel three-piece modular cage was inserted between two vertebral body replacements (polyurethane (PU) foam grade 15 pcf) in two ways. In group 1 (modular), the cage was inserted in a wedge within a wedge fashion according to the manufacturer’s instructions such that damage to the PU foam was minimized. In group 2 (mono-bloc), the modular cage was inserted pre-assembled as a one-piece, mono-bloc device. This insertion method required impaction and increased the potential of gouging the PU surfaces. Then, an axial preload was applied to the PU test blocks to simulate the preload on the spine in vivo and an anteriorly direct expulsion force was applied to the cages. Results The mean expulsion yield load in the test group with modular implantation was 392 ± 19 N compared to 287 ± 16 N in the test group where the mono-bloc implants were inserted and endplate gouging occurred. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Thus, the onset of cage migration occurred at significantly higher loads in the test group with modular insertion without endplate gouging compared to one-piece impaction with gouging taking place. In contrast, the stiffness and the ultimate load were similar in both test groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions This study showed that the cage insertion technique may have a significant effect on the cage migration risk. Prevention of endplate gouging during cage implantation has the potential to improve the primary stability of the cage. Cureus 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10141341/ /pubmed/37123763 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36845 Text en Copyright © 2023, Kienle et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neurosurgery
Kienle, Annette
Graf, Nicolas
Tao, Youping
Heuer, Frank
Endplate Trauma During Implant Insertion Affects the Expulsion Risk of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices
title Endplate Trauma During Implant Insertion Affects the Expulsion Risk of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices
title_full Endplate Trauma During Implant Insertion Affects the Expulsion Risk of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices
title_fullStr Endplate Trauma During Implant Insertion Affects the Expulsion Risk of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices
title_full_unstemmed Endplate Trauma During Implant Insertion Affects the Expulsion Risk of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices
title_short Endplate Trauma During Implant Insertion Affects the Expulsion Risk of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices
title_sort endplate trauma during implant insertion affects the expulsion risk of anterior lumbar interbody fusion devices
topic Neurosurgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37123763
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36845
work_keys_str_mv AT kienleannette endplatetraumaduringimplantinsertionaffectstheexpulsionriskofanteriorlumbarinterbodyfusiondevices
AT grafnicolas endplatetraumaduringimplantinsertionaffectstheexpulsionriskofanteriorlumbarinterbodyfusiondevices
AT taoyouping endplatetraumaduringimplantinsertionaffectstheexpulsionriskofanteriorlumbarinterbodyfusiondevices
AT heuerfrank endplatetraumaduringimplantinsertionaffectstheexpulsionriskofanteriorlumbarinterbodyfusiondevices