Cargando…
Assessing Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency: Which Confounders? A Narrative Review
The critical flicker fusion frequency (cFFF) refers to the frequency at which a regularly recurring change of light stimuli is perceived as steady. The cFFF threshold is often assessed in clinics to evaluate the temporal characteristics of the visual system, making it a common test for eye diseases....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040800 |
_version_ | 1785033379505242112 |
---|---|
author | Muth, Thomas Schipke, Jochen D. Brebeck, Anne-Kathrin Dreyer, Sven |
author_facet | Muth, Thomas Schipke, Jochen D. Brebeck, Anne-Kathrin Dreyer, Sven |
author_sort | Muth, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The critical flicker fusion frequency (cFFF) refers to the frequency at which a regularly recurring change of light stimuli is perceived as steady. The cFFF threshold is often assessed in clinics to evaluate the temporal characteristics of the visual system, making it a common test for eye diseases. Additionally, it serves as a helpful diagnostic tool for various neurological and internal diseases. In the field of diving/hyperbaric medicine, cFFF has been utilized to determine alertness and cognitive functions. Changes in the cFFF threshold have been linked to the influence of increased respiratory gas partial pressures, although there exist inconsistent results regarding this effect. Moreover, the use of flicker devices has produced mixed outcomes in previous studies. This narrative review aims to explore confounding factors that may affect the accuracy of cFFF threshold measurements, particularly in open-field studies. We identify five broad categories of such factors, including (1) participant characteristics, (2) optical factors, (3) smoking/drug use, (4) environmental aspects, and (5) breathing gases and partial pressures. We also discuss the application of cFFF measurements in the field of diving and hyperbaric medicine. In addition, we provide recommendations for interpreting changes in the cFFF threshold and how they are reported in research studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10141404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101414042023-04-29 Assessing Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency: Which Confounders? A Narrative Review Muth, Thomas Schipke, Jochen D. Brebeck, Anne-Kathrin Dreyer, Sven Medicina (Kaunas) Review The critical flicker fusion frequency (cFFF) refers to the frequency at which a regularly recurring change of light stimuli is perceived as steady. The cFFF threshold is often assessed in clinics to evaluate the temporal characteristics of the visual system, making it a common test for eye diseases. Additionally, it serves as a helpful diagnostic tool for various neurological and internal diseases. In the field of diving/hyperbaric medicine, cFFF has been utilized to determine alertness and cognitive functions. Changes in the cFFF threshold have been linked to the influence of increased respiratory gas partial pressures, although there exist inconsistent results regarding this effect. Moreover, the use of flicker devices has produced mixed outcomes in previous studies. This narrative review aims to explore confounding factors that may affect the accuracy of cFFF threshold measurements, particularly in open-field studies. We identify five broad categories of such factors, including (1) participant characteristics, (2) optical factors, (3) smoking/drug use, (4) environmental aspects, and (5) breathing gases and partial pressures. We also discuss the application of cFFF measurements in the field of diving and hyperbaric medicine. In addition, we provide recommendations for interpreting changes in the cFFF threshold and how they are reported in research studies. MDPI 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10141404/ /pubmed/37109758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040800 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Muth, Thomas Schipke, Jochen D. Brebeck, Anne-Kathrin Dreyer, Sven Assessing Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency: Which Confounders? A Narrative Review |
title | Assessing Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency: Which Confounders? A Narrative Review |
title_full | Assessing Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency: Which Confounders? A Narrative Review |
title_fullStr | Assessing Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency: Which Confounders? A Narrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency: Which Confounders? A Narrative Review |
title_short | Assessing Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency: Which Confounders? A Narrative Review |
title_sort | assessing critical flicker fusion frequency: which confounders? a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040800 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muththomas assessingcriticalflickerfusionfrequencywhichconfoundersanarrativereview AT schipkejochend assessingcriticalflickerfusionfrequencywhichconfoundersanarrativereview AT brebeckannekathrin assessingcriticalflickerfusionfrequencywhichconfoundersanarrativereview AT dreyersven assessingcriticalflickerfusionfrequencywhichconfoundersanarrativereview |