Cargando…
Differentiation of astrocytoma between grades II and III using a combination of methionine positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish a method for differentiating between grades II and III astrocytomas using preoperative imaging. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed astrocytic tumors, including 18 grade II astrocytomas (isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant: IDH-wildtype = 8:10) and 56 grad...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37123626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100193 |
_version_ | 1785033400424333312 |
---|---|
author | Yano, Hirohito Miwa, Kazuhiro Nakayama, Noriyuki Maruyama, Takashi Ohe, Naoyuki Ikuta, Soko Ikegame, Yuka Yamada, Tetsuya Takei, Hiroaki Owashi, Etsuko Ohmura, Kazufumi Yokoyama, Kazutoshi Kumagai, Morio Muragaki, Yoshihiro Iwama, Toru Shinoda, Jun |
author_facet | Yano, Hirohito Miwa, Kazuhiro Nakayama, Noriyuki Maruyama, Takashi Ohe, Naoyuki Ikuta, Soko Ikegame, Yuka Yamada, Tetsuya Takei, Hiroaki Owashi, Etsuko Ohmura, Kazufumi Yokoyama, Kazutoshi Kumagai, Morio Muragaki, Yoshihiro Iwama, Toru Shinoda, Jun |
author_sort | Yano, Hirohito |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish a method for differentiating between grades II and III astrocytomas using preoperative imaging. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed astrocytic tumors, including 18 grade II astrocytomas (isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant: IDH-wildtype = 8:10) and 56 grade III anaplastic astrocytomas (37:19). We recorded the maximum methionine (MET) uptake ratios (tumor-to-normal: T/N) on positron emission tomography (PET) and three MRS peak ratios: choline (Cho)/creatine (Cr), N-acetyl aspartate (NAA)/Cr, and Cho/NAA, between June 2015 and June 2020. We then evaluated the cut-off values to differentiate between grades II and III. We compared the grading results between contrast enhancement effects on MR and combinational diagnostic methods (CDM) on a scatter chart using the cutoff values of the T/N ratio and MRS parameters. RESULTS: The IDH-mutant group showed significant differences in the Cho/NAA ratio between grades II and III using univariate analysis; however, multiple regression analysis results negated this. The IDH-wildtype group showed no significant differences between the groups. Contrast enhancement effects also showed no significant differences in IDH status. Accordingly, regardless of the IDH status, no statistically independent factors differentiated between grades II and III. However, CDMs showed higher sensitivity and negative predictive value in distinguishing them than MRI contrast examinations for both IDH statuses. We demonstrated a significantly higher diagnostic rate of grade III than of grade II with CDM, which was more striking in the IDH-mutant group than in the wild-type group. CONCLUSIONS: CDM could be valuable in differentiating between grade II and III astrocytic tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10141501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101415012023-04-29 Differentiation of astrocytoma between grades II and III using a combination of methionine positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy Yano, Hirohito Miwa, Kazuhiro Nakayama, Noriyuki Maruyama, Takashi Ohe, Naoyuki Ikuta, Soko Ikegame, Yuka Yamada, Tetsuya Takei, Hiroaki Owashi, Etsuko Ohmura, Kazufumi Yokoyama, Kazutoshi Kumagai, Morio Muragaki, Yoshihiro Iwama, Toru Shinoda, Jun World Neurosurg X Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish a method for differentiating between grades II and III astrocytomas using preoperative imaging. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed astrocytic tumors, including 18 grade II astrocytomas (isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant: IDH-wildtype = 8:10) and 56 grade III anaplastic astrocytomas (37:19). We recorded the maximum methionine (MET) uptake ratios (tumor-to-normal: T/N) on positron emission tomography (PET) and three MRS peak ratios: choline (Cho)/creatine (Cr), N-acetyl aspartate (NAA)/Cr, and Cho/NAA, between June 2015 and June 2020. We then evaluated the cut-off values to differentiate between grades II and III. We compared the grading results between contrast enhancement effects on MR and combinational diagnostic methods (CDM) on a scatter chart using the cutoff values of the T/N ratio and MRS parameters. RESULTS: The IDH-mutant group showed significant differences in the Cho/NAA ratio between grades II and III using univariate analysis; however, multiple regression analysis results negated this. The IDH-wildtype group showed no significant differences between the groups. Contrast enhancement effects also showed no significant differences in IDH status. Accordingly, regardless of the IDH status, no statistically independent factors differentiated between grades II and III. However, CDMs showed higher sensitivity and negative predictive value in distinguishing them than MRI contrast examinations for both IDH statuses. We demonstrated a significantly higher diagnostic rate of grade III than of grade II with CDM, which was more striking in the IDH-mutant group than in the wild-type group. CONCLUSIONS: CDM could be valuable in differentiating between grade II and III astrocytic tumors. Elsevier 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10141501/ /pubmed/37123626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100193 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yano, Hirohito Miwa, Kazuhiro Nakayama, Noriyuki Maruyama, Takashi Ohe, Naoyuki Ikuta, Soko Ikegame, Yuka Yamada, Tetsuya Takei, Hiroaki Owashi, Etsuko Ohmura, Kazufumi Yokoyama, Kazutoshi Kumagai, Morio Muragaki, Yoshihiro Iwama, Toru Shinoda, Jun Differentiation of astrocytoma between grades II and III using a combination of methionine positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy |
title | Differentiation of astrocytoma between grades II and III using a combination of methionine positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy |
title_full | Differentiation of astrocytoma between grades II and III using a combination of methionine positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy |
title_fullStr | Differentiation of astrocytoma between grades II and III using a combination of methionine positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Differentiation of astrocytoma between grades II and III using a combination of methionine positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy |
title_short | Differentiation of astrocytoma between grades II and III using a combination of methionine positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy |
title_sort | differentiation of astrocytoma between grades ii and iii using a combination of methionine positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37123626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanohirohito differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT miwakazuhiro differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT nakayamanoriyuki differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT maruyamatakashi differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT ohenaoyuki differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT ikutasoko differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT ikegameyuka differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT yamadatetsuya differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT takeihiroaki differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT owashietsuko differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT ohmurakazufumi differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT yokoyamakazutoshi differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT kumagaimorio differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT muragakiyoshihiro differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT iwamatoru differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy AT shinodajun differentiationofastrocytomabetweengradesiiandiiiusingacombinationofmethioninepositronemissiontomographyandmagneticresonancespectroscopy |