Cargando…

Detecting deception using machine learning with facial expressions and pulse rate

Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, remote interviews have become an increasingly popular approach in many fields. For example, a survey by the HR Research Institute (PCR Institute in Survey on hiring activities for graduates of 2021 and 2022. https://www.hrpro.co.jp/research_detail.php?r_no=273. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsuchiya, Kento, Hatano, Ryo, Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37360281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10015-023-00869-9
Descripción
Sumario:Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, remote interviews have become an increasingly popular approach in many fields. For example, a survey by the HR Research Institute (PCR Institute in Survey on hiring activities for graduates of 2021 and 2022. https://www.hrpro.co.jp/research_detail.php?r_no=273. Accessed 03 Oct 2021) shows that more than 80% of job interviews are conducted remotely, particularly in large companies. However, for some reason, an interviewee might attempt to deceive an interviewer or feel difficult to tell the truth. Although the ability of interviewers to detect deception among interviewees is significant for their company or organization, it still strongly depends on their individual experience and cannot be automated. To address this issue, in this study, we propose a machine learning approach to aid in detecting whether a person is attempting to deceive the interlocutor by associating the features of their facial expressions with those of their pulse rate. We also constructed a more realistic dataset for the task of deception detection by asking subjects not to respond artificially, but rather to improvise natural responses using a web camera and wearable device (smartwatch). The results of an experimental evaluation of the proposed approach with 10-fold cross-validation using random forests classifier show that the accuracy and the F1 value were in the range between 0.75 and 0.8 for each subject, and the highest values were 0.87 and 0.88, respectively. Through the analysis of the importance of the features the trained models, we revealed the crucial features of each subject during deception, which differed among the subjects.