Cargando…
Reactive surveillance and response strategies for malaria elimination in Myanmar: a literature review
Myanmar, a country in Greater Mekong Sub-region, aims to eliminate malaria by 2030. To achieve malaria elimination, Myanmar adopted a reactive surveillance and response strategy of malaria case notification within 1 day and case investigation, foci investigation and response activities within 7 days...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04567-6 |
_version_ | 1785033488569729024 |
---|---|
author | Win Htike Nay Yi Yi Linn Kyawt Mon Win Lae Shwe Sin Myint May Chan Oo Ei Phyu Htwe Aung Khine Zaw O’Flaherty, Katherine Agius, Paul A. Kearney, Ellen A. Fowkes, Freya J. I. Win Han Oo |
author_facet | Win Htike Nay Yi Yi Linn Kyawt Mon Win Lae Shwe Sin Myint May Chan Oo Ei Phyu Htwe Aung Khine Zaw O’Flaherty, Katherine Agius, Paul A. Kearney, Ellen A. Fowkes, Freya J. I. Win Han Oo |
author_sort | Win Htike |
collection | PubMed |
description | Myanmar, a country in Greater Mekong Sub-region, aims to eliminate malaria by 2030. To achieve malaria elimination, Myanmar adopted a reactive surveillance and response strategy of malaria case notification within 1 day and case investigation, foci investigation and response activities within 7 days. A literature review was conducted to gain a better understanding of how the reactive surveillance and response strategies are being implemented in Myanmar including enablers and barriers to their implementation. Only two assessments of the completeness and timeliness of reactive surveillance and response strategy in Myanmar have been published to date. The proportion of positive cases notified within one day was 27.9% and the proportion of positive cases investigated within 7 days as recommended by the national guidelines varied from 32.5 to 91.8% under different settings in reported studies. Strong collaboration between the National Malaria Control Programme and implementing partners, and adequate human resource and financial support contributed to a successful and timely implementation of reactive surveillance and response strategy. Documented enablers for successful implementation of reactive surveillance and response strategy included frontline health workers having good knowledge of reactive surveillance and response activities and availability of Basic Health Staff for timely implementation of foci response activities. Barriers for implementation of reactive surveillance and response activities were also identified, including shortage of human resources especially in hard-to-reach settings, limited mobile phone network services and internet coverage leading to delays in timely notification of malaria cases, lengthy and complex case investigation forms and different reporting systems between Basic Health Staff and volunteers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-023-04567-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10141915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101419152023-04-29 Reactive surveillance and response strategies for malaria elimination in Myanmar: a literature review Win Htike Nay Yi Yi Linn Kyawt Mon Win Lae Shwe Sin Myint May Chan Oo Ei Phyu Htwe Aung Khine Zaw O’Flaherty, Katherine Agius, Paul A. Kearney, Ellen A. Fowkes, Freya J. I. Win Han Oo Malar J Review Myanmar, a country in Greater Mekong Sub-region, aims to eliminate malaria by 2030. To achieve malaria elimination, Myanmar adopted a reactive surveillance and response strategy of malaria case notification within 1 day and case investigation, foci investigation and response activities within 7 days. A literature review was conducted to gain a better understanding of how the reactive surveillance and response strategies are being implemented in Myanmar including enablers and barriers to their implementation. Only two assessments of the completeness and timeliness of reactive surveillance and response strategy in Myanmar have been published to date. The proportion of positive cases notified within one day was 27.9% and the proportion of positive cases investigated within 7 days as recommended by the national guidelines varied from 32.5 to 91.8% under different settings in reported studies. Strong collaboration between the National Malaria Control Programme and implementing partners, and adequate human resource and financial support contributed to a successful and timely implementation of reactive surveillance and response strategy. Documented enablers for successful implementation of reactive surveillance and response strategy included frontline health workers having good knowledge of reactive surveillance and response activities and availability of Basic Health Staff for timely implementation of foci response activities. Barriers for implementation of reactive surveillance and response activities were also identified, including shortage of human resources especially in hard-to-reach settings, limited mobile phone network services and internet coverage leading to delays in timely notification of malaria cases, lengthy and complex case investigation forms and different reporting systems between Basic Health Staff and volunteers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-023-04567-6. BioMed Central 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10141915/ /pubmed/37106350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04567-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Win Htike Nay Yi Yi Linn Kyawt Mon Win Lae Shwe Sin Myint May Chan Oo Ei Phyu Htwe Aung Khine Zaw O’Flaherty, Katherine Agius, Paul A. Kearney, Ellen A. Fowkes, Freya J. I. Win Han Oo Reactive surveillance and response strategies for malaria elimination in Myanmar: a literature review |
title | Reactive surveillance and response strategies for malaria elimination in Myanmar: a literature review |
title_full | Reactive surveillance and response strategies for malaria elimination in Myanmar: a literature review |
title_fullStr | Reactive surveillance and response strategies for malaria elimination in Myanmar: a literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Reactive surveillance and response strategies for malaria elimination in Myanmar: a literature review |
title_short | Reactive surveillance and response strategies for malaria elimination in Myanmar: a literature review |
title_sort | reactive surveillance and response strategies for malaria elimination in myanmar: a literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10141915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04567-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT winhtike reactivesurveillanceandresponsestrategiesformalariaeliminationinmyanmaraliteraturereview AT nayyiyilinn reactivesurveillanceandresponsestrategiesformalariaeliminationinmyanmaraliteraturereview AT kyawtmonwin reactivesurveillanceandresponsestrategiesformalariaeliminationinmyanmaraliteraturereview AT laeshwesinmyint reactivesurveillanceandresponsestrategiesformalariaeliminationinmyanmaraliteraturereview AT maychanoo reactivesurveillanceandresponsestrategiesformalariaeliminationinmyanmaraliteraturereview AT eiphyuhtwe reactivesurveillanceandresponsestrategiesformalariaeliminationinmyanmaraliteraturereview AT aungkhinezaw reactivesurveillanceandresponsestrategiesformalariaeliminationinmyanmaraliteraturereview AT oflahertykatherine reactivesurveillanceandresponsestrategiesformalariaeliminationinmyanmaraliteraturereview AT agiuspaula reactivesurveillanceandresponsestrategiesformalariaeliminationinmyanmaraliteraturereview AT kearneyellena reactivesurveillanceandresponsestrategiesformalariaeliminationinmyanmaraliteraturereview AT fowkesfreyaji reactivesurveillanceandresponsestrategiesformalariaeliminationinmyanmaraliteraturereview AT winhanoo reactivesurveillanceandresponsestrategiesformalariaeliminationinmyanmaraliteraturereview |