Cargando…

Machine Learning Identifies New Predictors on Restenosis Risk after Coronary Artery Stenting in 10,004 Patients with Surveillance Angiography

Objective: Machine learning (ML) approaches have the potential to uncover regular patterns in multi-layered data. Here we applied self-organizing maps (SOMs) to detect such patterns with the aim to better predict in-stent restenosis (ISR) at surveillance angiography 6 to 8 months after percutaneous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Güldener, Ulrich, Kessler, Thorsten, von Scheidt, Moritz, Hawe, Johann S., Gerhard, Beatrix, Maier, Dieter, Lachmann, Mark, Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig, Cassese, Salvatore, Schömig, Albert W., Kastrati, Adnan, Schunkert, Heribert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10142067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109283
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082941
_version_ 1785033524943781888
author Güldener, Ulrich
Kessler, Thorsten
von Scheidt, Moritz
Hawe, Johann S.
Gerhard, Beatrix
Maier, Dieter
Lachmann, Mark
Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
Cassese, Salvatore
Schömig, Albert W.
Kastrati, Adnan
Schunkert, Heribert
author_facet Güldener, Ulrich
Kessler, Thorsten
von Scheidt, Moritz
Hawe, Johann S.
Gerhard, Beatrix
Maier, Dieter
Lachmann, Mark
Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
Cassese, Salvatore
Schömig, Albert W.
Kastrati, Adnan
Schunkert, Heribert
author_sort Güldener, Ulrich
collection PubMed
description Objective: Machine learning (ML) approaches have the potential to uncover regular patterns in multi-layered data. Here we applied self-organizing maps (SOMs) to detect such patterns with the aim to better predict in-stent restenosis (ISR) at surveillance angiography 6 to 8 months after percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting. Methods: In prospectively collected data from 10,004 patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for 15,004 lesions, we applied SOMs to predict ISR angiographically 6–8 months after index procedure. SOM findings were compared with results of conventional uni- and multivariate analyses. The predictive value of both approaches was assessed after random splitting of patients into training and test sets (50:50). Results: Conventional multivariate analyses revealed 10, mostly known, predictors for restenosis after coronary stenting: balloon-to-vessel ratio, complex lesion morphology, diabetes mellitus, left main stenting, stent type (bare metal vs. first vs. second generation drug eluting stent), stent length, stenosis severity, vessel size reduction, and prior bypass surgery. The SOM approach identified all these and nine further predictors, including chronic vessel occlusion, lesion length, and prior PCI. Moreover, the SOM-based model performed well in predicting ISR (AUC under ROC: 0.728); however, there was no meaningful advantage in predicting ISR at surveillance angiography in comparison with the conventional multivariable model (0.726, p = 0.3). Conclusions: The agnostic SOM-based approach identified—without clinical knowledge—even more contributors to restenosis risk. In fact, SOMs applied to a large prospectively sampled cohort identified several novel predictors of restenosis after PCI. However, as compared with established covariates, ML technologies did not improve identification of patients at high risk for restenosis after PCI in a clinically relevant fashion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10142067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101420672023-04-29 Machine Learning Identifies New Predictors on Restenosis Risk after Coronary Artery Stenting in 10,004 Patients with Surveillance Angiography Güldener, Ulrich Kessler, Thorsten von Scheidt, Moritz Hawe, Johann S. Gerhard, Beatrix Maier, Dieter Lachmann, Mark Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig Cassese, Salvatore Schömig, Albert W. Kastrati, Adnan Schunkert, Heribert J Clin Med Article Objective: Machine learning (ML) approaches have the potential to uncover regular patterns in multi-layered data. Here we applied self-organizing maps (SOMs) to detect such patterns with the aim to better predict in-stent restenosis (ISR) at surveillance angiography 6 to 8 months after percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting. Methods: In prospectively collected data from 10,004 patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for 15,004 lesions, we applied SOMs to predict ISR angiographically 6–8 months after index procedure. SOM findings were compared with results of conventional uni- and multivariate analyses. The predictive value of both approaches was assessed after random splitting of patients into training and test sets (50:50). Results: Conventional multivariate analyses revealed 10, mostly known, predictors for restenosis after coronary stenting: balloon-to-vessel ratio, complex lesion morphology, diabetes mellitus, left main stenting, stent type (bare metal vs. first vs. second generation drug eluting stent), stent length, stenosis severity, vessel size reduction, and prior bypass surgery. The SOM approach identified all these and nine further predictors, including chronic vessel occlusion, lesion length, and prior PCI. Moreover, the SOM-based model performed well in predicting ISR (AUC under ROC: 0.728); however, there was no meaningful advantage in predicting ISR at surveillance angiography in comparison with the conventional multivariable model (0.726, p = 0.3). Conclusions: The agnostic SOM-based approach identified—without clinical knowledge—even more contributors to restenosis risk. In fact, SOMs applied to a large prospectively sampled cohort identified several novel predictors of restenosis after PCI. However, as compared with established covariates, ML technologies did not improve identification of patients at high risk for restenosis after PCI in a clinically relevant fashion. MDPI 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10142067/ /pubmed/37109283 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082941 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Güldener, Ulrich
Kessler, Thorsten
von Scheidt, Moritz
Hawe, Johann S.
Gerhard, Beatrix
Maier, Dieter
Lachmann, Mark
Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
Cassese, Salvatore
Schömig, Albert W.
Kastrati, Adnan
Schunkert, Heribert
Machine Learning Identifies New Predictors on Restenosis Risk after Coronary Artery Stenting in 10,004 Patients with Surveillance Angiography
title Machine Learning Identifies New Predictors on Restenosis Risk after Coronary Artery Stenting in 10,004 Patients with Surveillance Angiography
title_full Machine Learning Identifies New Predictors on Restenosis Risk after Coronary Artery Stenting in 10,004 Patients with Surveillance Angiography
title_fullStr Machine Learning Identifies New Predictors on Restenosis Risk after Coronary Artery Stenting in 10,004 Patients with Surveillance Angiography
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning Identifies New Predictors on Restenosis Risk after Coronary Artery Stenting in 10,004 Patients with Surveillance Angiography
title_short Machine Learning Identifies New Predictors on Restenosis Risk after Coronary Artery Stenting in 10,004 Patients with Surveillance Angiography
title_sort machine learning identifies new predictors on restenosis risk after coronary artery stenting in 10,004 patients with surveillance angiography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10142067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109283
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082941
work_keys_str_mv AT guldenerulrich machinelearningidentifiesnewpredictorsonrestenosisriskaftercoronaryarterystentingin10004patientswithsurveillanceangiography
AT kesslerthorsten machinelearningidentifiesnewpredictorsonrestenosisriskaftercoronaryarterystentingin10004patientswithsurveillanceangiography
AT vonscheidtmoritz machinelearningidentifiesnewpredictorsonrestenosisriskaftercoronaryarterystentingin10004patientswithsurveillanceangiography
AT hawejohanns machinelearningidentifiesnewpredictorsonrestenosisriskaftercoronaryarterystentingin10004patientswithsurveillanceangiography
AT gerhardbeatrix machinelearningidentifiesnewpredictorsonrestenosisriskaftercoronaryarterystentingin10004patientswithsurveillanceangiography
AT maierdieter machinelearningidentifiesnewpredictorsonrestenosisriskaftercoronaryarterystentingin10004patientswithsurveillanceangiography
AT lachmannmark machinelearningidentifiesnewpredictorsonrestenosisriskaftercoronaryarterystentingin10004patientswithsurveillanceangiography
AT laugwitzkarlludwig machinelearningidentifiesnewpredictorsonrestenosisriskaftercoronaryarterystentingin10004patientswithsurveillanceangiography
AT cassesesalvatore machinelearningidentifiesnewpredictorsonrestenosisriskaftercoronaryarterystentingin10004patientswithsurveillanceangiography
AT schomigalbertw machinelearningidentifiesnewpredictorsonrestenosisriskaftercoronaryarterystentingin10004patientswithsurveillanceangiography
AT kastratiadnan machinelearningidentifiesnewpredictorsonrestenosisriskaftercoronaryarterystentingin10004patientswithsurveillanceangiography
AT schunkertheribert machinelearningidentifiesnewpredictorsonrestenosisriskaftercoronaryarterystentingin10004patientswithsurveillanceangiography