Cargando…
Comparison of Automated and Traditional Western Blotting Methods
Traditional Western blotting is one of the most used analytical techniques in biological research. However, it can be time-consuming and suffer from a lack of reproducibility. Consequently, devices with different degrees of automation have been developed. These include semi-automated techniques and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10142486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37104025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps6020043 |
_version_ | 1785033624838471680 |
---|---|
author | Sormunen, Aino Koivulehto, Emma Alitalo, Kari Saksela, Kalle Laham-Karam, Nihay Ylä-Herttuala, Seppo |
author_facet | Sormunen, Aino Koivulehto, Emma Alitalo, Kari Saksela, Kalle Laham-Karam, Nihay Ylä-Herttuala, Seppo |
author_sort | Sormunen, Aino |
collection | PubMed |
description | Traditional Western blotting is one of the most used analytical techniques in biological research. However, it can be time-consuming and suffer from a lack of reproducibility. Consequently, devices with different degrees of automation have been developed. These include semi-automated techniques and fully automated devices that replicate all stages downstream of the sample preparation, including sample size separation, immunoblotting, imaging, and analysis. We directly compared traditional Western blotting with two different automated systems, iBind™ Flex, which is a semi-automated system designed to perform the immunoblotting, and JESS Simple Western™, a fully automated and capillary-based system performing all steps downstream of sample preparation and loading, including imaging and image analysis. We found that a fully automated system can save time and importantly offer valuable sensitivity. This is particularly beneficial for limited sample amounts. The downside of automation is the cost of devices and reagents. Nevertheless, automation can be a good option to increase output and facilitate sensitive protein analyses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10142486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101424862023-04-29 Comparison of Automated and Traditional Western Blotting Methods Sormunen, Aino Koivulehto, Emma Alitalo, Kari Saksela, Kalle Laham-Karam, Nihay Ylä-Herttuala, Seppo Methods Protoc Brief Report Traditional Western blotting is one of the most used analytical techniques in biological research. However, it can be time-consuming and suffer from a lack of reproducibility. Consequently, devices with different degrees of automation have been developed. These include semi-automated techniques and fully automated devices that replicate all stages downstream of the sample preparation, including sample size separation, immunoblotting, imaging, and analysis. We directly compared traditional Western blotting with two different automated systems, iBind™ Flex, which is a semi-automated system designed to perform the immunoblotting, and JESS Simple Western™, a fully automated and capillary-based system performing all steps downstream of sample preparation and loading, including imaging and image analysis. We found that a fully automated system can save time and importantly offer valuable sensitivity. This is particularly beneficial for limited sample amounts. The downside of automation is the cost of devices and reagents. Nevertheless, automation can be a good option to increase output and facilitate sensitive protein analyses. MDPI 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10142486/ /pubmed/37104025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps6020043 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Sormunen, Aino Koivulehto, Emma Alitalo, Kari Saksela, Kalle Laham-Karam, Nihay Ylä-Herttuala, Seppo Comparison of Automated and Traditional Western Blotting Methods |
title | Comparison of Automated and Traditional Western Blotting Methods |
title_full | Comparison of Automated and Traditional Western Blotting Methods |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Automated and Traditional Western Blotting Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Automated and Traditional Western Blotting Methods |
title_short | Comparison of Automated and Traditional Western Blotting Methods |
title_sort | comparison of automated and traditional western blotting methods |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10142486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37104025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps6020043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sormunenaino comparisonofautomatedandtraditionalwesternblottingmethods AT koivulehtoemma comparisonofautomatedandtraditionalwesternblottingmethods AT alitalokari comparisonofautomatedandtraditionalwesternblottingmethods AT sakselakalle comparisonofautomatedandtraditionalwesternblottingmethods AT lahamkaramnihay comparisonofautomatedandtraditionalwesternblottingmethods AT ylaherttualaseppo comparisonofautomatedandtraditionalwesternblottingmethods |